Refextract Bugs

  • If a reference spans over 2 lines like this:
    • Phys. Rev.
    • A21 (2011) 56
    • It will not be recognized because lines are reconstructed like this:
    • Phys. Rev.-A21 (2011) 56
    • Which is not a valid format. * If there is a plot in between references, the result is sketchy at best.
  • Retarded author format with 2 comas Dougherty, S.M., Beasley A.J. is not recognized properly
  • Authors with 5 or more name particules are not recognized Joe de Rose Silva Maria
  • Authors with accents or weird symbols are not recognized
  • There is not handling for erratum-ibid
  • Footnotes references should not be recognized
  • If there is a number of a page refering to the PDF at the end of a reference,
    e.g. Phys.Rev. A51 (2011) 56 where 56 is the page in the PDF
    well it is easy to guess the parser cannot tell the difference
  • This is not recognized CERN-2004-003-V-1
  • This is not recognized either Nato Advanced Study Institutes Series: Series B, Physics, 59
  • When a document has multiple references sections, the result is undetermined but it definitely won't find more than one
  • There is no size limit for references
  • If numerotation or a journal is partially recognized it will end up in the misc field but it will be mangled.
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r4 < r3 < r2 < r1 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r4 - 2012-08-24 - AlessioDeiana
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    Inspire All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2023 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback