A place to collect UI suggestions and fixes. We will pick several of these that are quick wins, and group them into a small iteration that gets developed and deployed by early July.

Let us take:

• 2 weeks to gather suggestions (i.e. close suggestions that can make it into 1st iteration) -June 4
• 1 week to pick for the iteration - June 10
• 2-3 weeks for development and deployment - July 1.

Suggestions

To be sorted

Detailed record page

• the centering of stuff on the detailed record page; this seems to be too paper-era like presentation. Left-aligned sections would be more readable, I think, as well as more `modern' looking for e-publishing age.

• on pages like <http://inspirebeta.net/record/871038>, when we offer links to publishers, we can simply underline printed `Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 094004' reference on the spot, i.e. turn it into a clickable link. It should not be necessary to single out `Journal Server' link from there and present it clickable in another, far-away place. This is quite a usability flaw in my eyes. (Ditto for making printed arXiv number more easily clickable.)

For 1 st iteration

Detailed Record page

• Fulltext links: Move fulltext links to rhs of detailed record page <http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/165858> though could also just move up above plots a la <http://doc.rero.ch/record/22281>

For later

-- TravisBrooks - 18-May-2011