TABLE OF CONTENTS


Bootstrap CMS info into CRIC prototype

CMS Site

CMS Site vs GocDB /OIM site investigation

Sites in sitedb (under lcg tag) but not on OIM/GocDB:

LCG Site Name CMS Site name In VOFeed? Proposed actionSorted ascending Required action from CMS
Argonne T3_US_ANL NO Add the site to CORE -
INFN-IT_OPPORTUNISTIC T3_IT_Opportunistic No Add the site to CORE -
Northeastern T3_US_NEU NO Add the site to CORE -
T3USHEPCLOUD T3_US_HEPCloud YES Add the site to CORE -
JHU T3_US_JHU NO Add the site to CORE -
Kansas T3_US_Kansas NO Add the site to CORE -
T3_US_UTENN T3_US_UTENN NO Add the site to CORE -
USCMS-FNAL-LPC T3_US_FNALLPC YES Add the site to CORE -
Volunteer_CMS T3_CH_Volunteer YES Add the site to CORE -
UVA-HEP under lcg tag is mapped to UVA T3_US_UVA YES Add the site to CORE, the name to be confirmed -
VBU_CMSunder lcg taf is mapped to T3_IN_VBU T3_IN_VBU YES Add the site to CORE, the name to be confirmed -
t3ustacc under lcg tag is mapped to T3_US_TACC T3_US_TACC NO Add the site to CORE, the name to be confirmed -
t3uswisconsin under lcg tag is mapped to T3 US Wisconsin T3_US_Wisconsin NO Add the site to CORE, the name to be confirmed -
T3_US_Princeton_ICSE T3_US_Princeton_ICSE YES For some reason the name of the site in CORE is now Princeton_ICSE_T3_CMS should be T3_US_Princeton_ICSE instead -
ru-Moscow-SINP-LCG2 under LCG tag is mapped to SINP T2_RU_SINP YES Strange that SINP T3 site is registered in GocDB, while T2 one is not, need confirmation from CMS what to do with this site Probably T2 site has to be registered in GocDB
None under lcg tag is mapped to MEPhI T3_RU_MEPhI No The site exists in GocDB and CORE with name ru-Moscow-MEPHI-LCG2 and proper mapping to the CMS site Might need a fix in SiteDB , instead of None under LCG tag should have ru-Moscow-MEPHI-LCG2, the fix in Glidein XML is required as well
UKI-GridPP-Cloud under lcg tag is mapped to GridPP Cloud T3_UK_GridPP_Cloud NO The site is registred in GocDB , but with the name is UKI-GridPP-Cloud-IC Add the site to CORE, but the name in SiteDB might need to be corrected Make the name in SiteDB consistent with the name registered in GocDB
ru-Moscow-SINP-LCG2-t3 under lcg tag is mapped to Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics T3_RU_SINP NO THe site name registered in GocDB is ru-Moscow-SINP-T3 which is inconsistent with the name in SiteDB. Looks to be a mistake. Should add to CORE, but need to understand with which name, the change in SiteDB is desired Make the name in SiteDB consistent with the one the site is registered in GocDB
NU Tier3 under lcg tag is mapped to Northwestern T3_US_NU NO to be added to CORE, the name to be confirmed -
T2-MY-UMSIFIR under lcg tag is mapped to University of Malaya T2_MY_SIFIR NO to be added to CORE, the name to be confirmed -
grid.puhep.res.in under lcg tag is mapped to PUHEP T3_IN_PUHEP NO to be added to CORE, the name to be confirmed -
JINR-T1-DISK no cms site is defined NO Whether sites with '-DISK' extension are needed, to confirm with CMS Please, confirm what to do with '-DISK' sites
RAL-LCG2-DISK is mapped under lcg tag to RALDISK T1_UK_RAL_Disk NO Whether sites with '-DISK' extension are needed, to confirm with CMS Please, confirm waht to do with '-DISK' sites
USCMS-FNAL-WC1-DISK is mapped under wlcg tag to FNALDISK T1_US_FNAL_Disk NO Whether sites with '-DISK' extension are needed, to confirm with CMS Please, confirm what to do with '-DISK' sites

Sites in VOFeed but not in GocDB /OIM:

Site Name CMS site name Whether returned by SiteDB site-names API Proposed action Required action from CMS
Comet T3_US_SDSC NO Add the site to CORE -
None T3_RU_MEPhI YES The site ru-Moscow-MEPHI-LCG2 is registered in GocDB and is in CORE with this name Might need a fix in SiteDB , insted of None under LCG tag should have ru-Moscow-MEPHI-LCG2, the fix in Glidein XML is required as well
SU-OG-CE T3_US_OSG NO This is wrong. We skip importing it and we instead hardcode the data needed to generate the vofeed. -
SU-OG-CE1 T3_US_OSG NO This is wrong. We skip importing it and we instead hardcode the data needed to generate the vofeed. -
Stampede T3_US_TACC NO There is no site Stampede in SiteDB, there is t3ustacc instead, so in core we should add the site with the name Glidein entry shuld be fixed in order to have to t3ustacc instead of Stampede
T3USHEPCLOUD T3_US_HEPCloud YES Add the site to CORE -
T3_CH_CERN_HelixNebula T3_CH_CERN_HelixNebula YES but is mapped under lcg tag to HelixNebula Add the site to CORE, name to be confirmed -
T3_US_Princeton_ICSE T3_US_Princeton_ICSE YES but is mapped under lcg tag to Princeton ICSE Add the site to CORE, name to be confirmed -
TAMU_BRAZOS_CE T3_US_TAMU NO Add the site to CORE -
UCSDT2Sleep     Is not any more in VOfeed
USCMS-FNAL-LPC T3_US_FNALLPC YES Add the site to CORE -
UVA-HEP T3_US_UVA YES but mapped under lcg tag to UVA Add the site to CORE, name to be confirmed -
VBU_CMS T3_IN_VBU YES but mapped under lcg tag to T3_IN_VBU Add the site to CORE, name to be confirmed -
Volunteer_CMS T3_CH_Volunteer YES Add the site to CORE, name to be confirmed -
umd-ce T3_US_UMD YES it exists but with the name umd-cms under lcg tag which is mapped to UMD umd-cms site does exist in OIM and Core and is corrcetly mapped to T3_US_UMD The problem looks to come from Glidein entry , where we have umd-ce instead of umd-cms. If the problem is fixed there, it is also fixed in VOfeed , and everything is consistent

Old table containing all sites and comments:

CMS Name Core Name Core site appearance Mapping source CMS name appearances count Core Name appearances count SiteDB Title SiteDB Usage Issue Clarification
T0_CH_CERN CERN-PROD gocdb both 1 3 CERN Tier-0 None see below -
T2_CH_CERN CERN-PROD gocdb both 1 3 CERN Tier-2 None see below -
T3_CH_CERN_CAF CERN-PROD gocdb both 1 3 T3_CH_CERN_CAF LCG CMS sites associated to CERN-PROD have both “other” and “None” usage. In this context:
- “None” should mean “dedicated resource" (with even WMAgent instance for T0) for reconstruction (T0) or alignment and calibration (T2)?
- “other” for T3 means accessible via CRAB for analysis or commissioning only to a restricted set of people (see the SITECONF entry)?
-
T2_CH_CERN_AI CERN-PROD-AI none siteDB 1 1 CERN Tier-2 AI LCG CERN-PROD-AI core site was created in CRIC. What does "LCG" usage mean in this context? Will be removed from siteDB, for the time being let's create a peer as it is in core.
T2_CH_CERN_HLT CERN-PROD-HLT none siteDB 1 1 CERN Tier-2 HLT LCG CERN-PROD-HLT core site was created in CRIC. Does “LCG” usage mean: resources here can be accessed via the “HLT cloud interface”? for the time being let's create a peer as it is in core.
T2_CH_CERN_Wigner CERN-PROD-WIGNER none siteDB 1 1 CERN Tier-2 Wigner LCG CERN-PROD-WIGNER core site was created in CRIC. What does "LCG" usage mean in this context? Will be removed from siteDB, for the time being let's create a peer as it is in core.
T3_CH_CERN_HelixNebula CERN_HelixNebula_CMS none siteDB 1 1 HelixNebula LCG CERN_HelixNebula_CMS core site was created in CRIC. What does "LCG" usage mean in this context? for the time being let's create a peer as it is in core.
T3_CH_CERN_OpenData Public_CERN_CMS none both 1 1 CERN Open Data other CERN Open Data core site was created in CRIC. In this context, does “other” mean: not used for WLCG jobs? for the time being let's create a peer as it is in core.
T1_RU_JINR JINR-T1 gocdb both 1 1 JINR-T1 LCG - -
T1_RU_JINR_Disk JINR-T1-DISK none siteDB 1 1 JINR-T1DISK LCG We should understand what is the use of the '_Disk' suffix. let's skip all _Disk sites for the time being
T1_DE_KIT FZK-LCG2 gocdb both 1 1 KIT LCG - -
T1_ES_PIC pic gocdb both 1 1 PIC LCG - -
T1_FR_CCIN2P3 IN2P3 -CC gocdb both 1 1 CC-IN2P3 LCG - -
T1_IT_CNAF INFN-T1 gocdb both 1 1 CNAF LCG - -
T1_UK_RAL RAL-LCG2 gocdb both 1 1 RAL LCG - -
T1_UK_RAL_Disk RAL-LCG2-DISK none siteDB 1 1 RALDISK None We should understand what is the use of the '_Disk' suffix. skip this site
T1_US_FNAL USCMS-FNAL-WC1 both both 1 1 FNAL OSG - -
T1_US_FNAL_Disk USCMS-FNAL-WC1-DISK none siteDB 1 1 FNALDISK None We should understand what is the use of the '_Disk' suffix. skip this site
T2_AT_Vienna Hephy-Vienna gocdb both 1 1 Hephy-Vienna LCG - -
T2_BE_IIHE BEgrid-ULB-VUB gocdb both 1 1 IIHE LCG - -
T2_BE_UCL BelGrid -UCL gocdb both 1 1 Louvain LCG - -
T2_BR_SPRACE SPRACE oim both 1 1 SPRACE OSG - -
T2_BR_UERJ UERJ oim both 2 1 HEPGRID_UERJ OSG - This is the currently used mapping since we are not yet using VOFeed to populate the db.
T2_BR_UERJ UERJ_CE_2 none VOFeed 2 1 - - - Will be fixed
T2_CH_CSCS CSCS-LCG2 gocdb both 1 2 CSCS LCG - -
T2_CH_CSCS_HPC CSCS-LCG2 gocdb both 1 2 Swiss National Supercomputing Centre LCG - -
T2_CN_Beijing BEIJING-LCG2 gocdb both 1 1 Beijing LCG - -
T2_DE_DESY DESY-HH gocdb both 1 1 DESY LCG - -
T2_DE_RWTH RWTH-Aachen gocdb both 1 1 RWTH LCG - -
T2_EE_Estonia T2_Estonia gocdb both 1 1 Estonia LCG - -
T2_ES_CIEMAT CIEMAT-LCG2 gocdb both 1 1 CIEMAT LCG - -
T2_ES_IFCA IFCA-LCG2 gocdb both 1 1 IFCA LCG - -
T2_FI_HIP FI_HIP_T2 gocdb both 1 1 Helsinki Institute of Physics ARC The ARC usage (I assume for NordUGrid) is set only for "Helsinki Institute of Physics" title: the corresponding physical site FI_HIP_T2 is registered in GocDB. Can this value be changed into LCG, or should we keep it for some NordUGrid specific features? -
T2_FR_CCIN2P3 IN2P3 -CC-T2 gocdb both 1 1 CC-IN2P3 AF LCG - -
T2_FR_GRIF_IRFU GRIF gocdb both 1 2 GRIF_IRFU LCG - -
T2_FR_GRIF_LLR GRIF gocdb both 1 2 GRIF_LLR LCG - -
T2_FR_IPHC IN2P3 -IRES gocdb both 1 1 IPHC LCG - -
T2_GR_Ioannina GR-07-UOI-HEPLAB gocdb both 1 1 Ioannina LCG - -
T2_HU_Budapest BUDAPEST gocdb both 1 1 Hungary LCG - -
T2_IN_TIFR INDIACMS-TIFR gocdb both 1 1 - -
T2_IT_Bari INFN-BARI gocdb both 1 1 Bari LCG - -
T2_IT_Legnaro INFN-LNL-2 gocdb both 1 1 Legnaro LCG - -
T2_IT_Pisa INFN-PISA gocdb both 1 1 Pisa LCG - -
T2_IT_Rome INFN-ROMA1-CMS gocdb both 1 1 Rome LCG - -
T2_KR_KISTI KR-KISTI-GSDC-02 gocdb both 1 1 KISTI-GSDC LCG - -
T2_KR_KNU LCG_KNU gocdb both 1 1 KNU LCG - -
T2_MY_SIFIR T2-MY-UMSIFIR none siteDB 1 1 University of Malaya LCG - -
T2_MY_UPM_BIRUNI MY-UPM-BIRUNI-01 gocdb siteDB 1 1 UPM Biruni LCG - -
T2_PK_NCP NCP-LCG2 gocdb both 1 1 NCP-LCG2 LCG - -
T2_PL_Swierk NCBJ-CIS gocdb both 1 1 T2_PL_Swierk LCG - -
T2_PL_Warsaw ICM gocdb both 1 1 Warsaw LCG - -
T2_PT_NCG_Lisbon NCG-INGRID-PT gocdb both 1 1 NCG-INGRID-PT None Should usage be LCG? -
T2_RU_IHEP RU-Protvino-IHEP gocdb both 1 1 IHEP None Should usage be LCG? -
T2_RU_INR Ru-Troitsk-INR-LCG2 gocdb both 1 1 INR None Should usage be LCG? -
T2_RU_ITEP ITEP gocdb both 1 1 ITEP None Should usage be LCG? -
T2_RU_PNPI ru-PNPI gocdb both 1 1 PNPI None Should usage be LCG? -
T2_RU_JINR JINR-LCG2 gocdb both 3 1 JINR None We should understand why T2_RU_JINR seems to be associated with 3 sites ( note that only one of those 3 can be found in our databases) This is the correct mapping (JINR_NOVA_CE1 and JINR_NOVA_CE2 are wrong entries).
Why usage is None? Should be LCG?
T2_RU_JINR JINR_NOVA_CE1 none VOFeed 3 1 - Invalid mapping, will be fixed in the source
T2_RU_JINR JINR_NOVA_CE2 none VOFeed 3 1 - Invalid mapping, will be fixed in the source
T2_RU_SINP ru-Moscow-SINP-LCG2 none both 1 1 SINP None ru-Moscow-SINP-LCG2 does not exist in GocDB. TBC -
T2_TH_CUNSTDA T2-TH-CUNSTDA gocdb both 1 1 CUNSTDA LCG - -
T2_TR_METU TR-03-METU gocdb both 1 1 METU None Should usage be LCG? -
T2_TW_NCHC TW-NCHC gocdb both 1 1 Nat Center High Perf Comp NCHC LCG - -
T2_UA_KIPT Kharkov-KIPT-LCG2 gocdb both 1 1 KIPT None Should usage be LCG? -
T2_UK_London_Brunel UKI-LT2-Brunel gocdb both 1 1 Brunel LCG - -
T2_UK_London_IC UKI-LT2-IC-HEP gocdb both 1 1 IC LCG - -
T2_UK_SGrid_Bristol UKI-SOUTHGRID-BRIS-HEP gocdb both 1 1 Bristol LCG - -
T2_UK_SGrid_RALPP UKI-SOUTHGRID-RALPP gocdb both 1 1 Rutherford PPD LCG - -
T2_US_Caltech CIT_CMS_T2 oim both 1 1 Caltech Unknown Should usage be changed to OSG? -
T2_US_Florida UFlorida-HPC oim both 1 1 Florida OSG - -
T2_US_MIT MIT_CMS oim both 1 1 MIT OSG - -
T2_US_Nebraska Nebraska oim both 4 1 Nebraska OSG We should understand why T2_US_Nebraska seems to be associated with 4 different CORE sites. This is the currently used mapping since we are not yet using VOFeed to populate the db. Map T2_US_Nebraska to Nebraska
T2_US_Nebraska Sandhills oim VOFeed 4 1 - - We should understand why T2_US_Nebraska seems to be associated with 4 different CORE sites. map to Nebraska
T2_US_Nebraska Crane oim VOFeed 4 1 - - We should understand why T2_US_Nebraska seems to be associated with 4 different CORE sites. map to Nebraska
T2_US_Nebraska Tusker oim VOFeed 4 1 - - We should understand why T2_US_Nebraska seems to be associated with 4 different CORE sites. map to Nebraska
T2_US_Purdue Purdue-Conte oim both 6 1 We should understand why T2_US_Purdue CMS site seems to be associated with multiple core sites. Let's map all CMS purdue sites to a single Purdue site Purdue-Hammer, handle it as an exceptional case in the code
T2_US_Purdue Purdue-Hammer oim both 6 1 Purdue OSG We should understand why T2_US_Purdue CMS site seems to be associated with multiple core sites. -
T2_US_Purdue Purdue-Carter oim siteDB 6 1 Purdue OSG We should understand why T2_US_Purdue CMS site seems to be associated with multiple core sites. -
T2_US_Purdue Purdue-Hadoop oim both 6 1 Purdue OSG We should understand why T2_US_Purdue CMS site seems to be associated with multiple core sites. -
T2_US_Purdue Purdue-Rice oim both 6 1 Purdue OSG We should understand why T2_US_Purdue CMS site seems to be associated with multiple core sites. -
T2_US_Purdue Purdue-Halstead oim both 6 1 Purdue OSG We should understand why T2_US_Purdue CMS site seems to be associated with multiple core sites. -
T2_US_UCSD UCSDT2 oim both 2 1 UCSD OSG - -
T2_US_UCSD UCSDT2-B none siteDB 2 1 - - UCSDT2 exists in OIM but not UCSDT2-B This entry is invalid and it has been removed from SiteDB
T2_US_Vanderbilt Vanderbilt oim both 1 1 Vanderbilt OSG - -
T2_US_Wisconsin GLOW oim both 1 1 Wisconsin OSG - -
T3_BG_UNI_SOFIA BG05-SUGrid gocdb both 1 1 Uni Sofia LCG - -
T3_BY_NCPHEP BY-NCPHEP gocdb both 1 1 BY-NCPHEP None Should usage be LCG? -
T3_CH_PSI T3_CH_PSI gocdb both 1 1 PSI None Should usage be LCG? -
T3_CH_Volunteer Volunteer_CMS none both 1 1 Volunteer LCG Volunteer_CMS is not in GocDB, what does LCG usage mean here? -
T3_CN_PKU CN-BEIJING-PKU gocdb both 1 1 CN_PKU LCG - -
T3_CO_Uniandes UNIANDES gocdb both 1 1 UNIANDES LCG - -
T3_ES_Oviedo UOGRID gocdb siteDB 1 1 Oviedo Unknown Should usage be LCG? -
T3_FR_IPNL IN2P3 -IPNL gocdb both 1 1 IN2P3 -IPNL LCG - -
T3_GR_Demokritos GR-05-DEMOKRITOS gocdb siteDB 1 1 Demokritos LCG - -
T3_GR_IASA GR-06-IASA gocdb siteDB 2 1 IASA LCG - -
T3_GR_IASA HG-02-IASA gocdb both 2 1 IASA LCG - map to GR-06-IASA
T3_HR_IRB egee.irb.hr gocdb both 1 1 IRB LCG - -
T3_HU_Debrecen T3_HU_Debrecen gocdb both 1 1 T3_HU_Debrecen LCG - -
T3_IN_PUHEP grid.puhep.res.in none siteDB 1 1 PUHEP LCG grid.puhep.res.in site is not in GocDB. What does LCG usage mean here? -
T3_IN_TIFRCloud T3_IN_TIFRCloud gocdb both 1 1 TIFR Opportunistic LCG - -
T3_IN_VBU VBU_CMS none both 1 1 T3_IN_VBU LCG VBU_CMS site is not in GocDB. What does LCG usage mean here? -
T3_IR_IPM IR-IPM-HEP gocdb both 1 1 IPM None Should usage be LCG? -
T3_IT_Bologna INFN-BOLOGNA-T3 gocdb both 1 1 Bologna-T3 None Should usage be LCG? -
T3_IT_Firenze INFN-FIRENZE gocdb siteDB 1 1 Firenze None Should usage be LCG? -
T3_IT_MIB INFN-MIB gocdb both 1 1 INFN-MIB LCG - -
T3_IT_Opportunistic INFN-IT_OPPORTUNISTIC none siteDB 1 1 T3_IT_Opportunistic other - -
T3_IT_Perugia INFN-PERUGIA gocdb both 1 1 Perugia LCG - -
T3_IT_Trieste INFN-TRIESTE gocdb both 1 1 Trieste LCG - -
T3_KR_KISTI T3_KR_KISTI oim both 1 1 KISTI T3 OSG - -
T3_KR_KNU KR-KNU-T3 gocdb both 1 1 KR_KNU LCG - -
T3_KR_UOS KR-UOS-SSCC gocdb both 1 1 UOS LCG - -
T3_MX_Cinvestav cinvestav oim both 1 1 cinvestav OSG - -
T3_RU_FIAN ru-Moscow-FIAN-LCG2 gocdb both 1 1 FIAN LCG - -
T3_RU_MEPhI None none both 1 1 MEPhI LCG This site relates to a site called 'None' both on SiteDB and VOFeed. We should check if this is a mistake or something else. associate to GocDB site ru-Moscow-MEPHI-LCG2
T3_RU_SINP ru-Moscow-SINP-LCG2-t3 none siteDB 1 1 Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics LCG ru-Moscow-SINP-LCG2-t3 does not exist in GocDB Map to GocDB site ru-Moscow-SINP-T3. This is consistent with LCG usage.
T3_TH_CHULA T3-TH-CHULA gocdb both 1 1 T3_TH_CHULA LCG - -
T3_TW_NCU TW-NCUHEP gocdb both 1 1 NCU LCG - -
T3_TW_NTU_HEP TW-NTU-HEP gocdb both 1 1 NTU_HEP LCG - -
T3_UK_GridPP_Cloud UKI-GridPP-Cloud none siteDB 1 1 GridPP Cloud LCG - -
T3_UK_London_QMUL UKI-LT2-QMUL gocdb both 1 1 QMUL None Should usage be LCG? -
T3_UK_London_RHUL UKI-LT2-RHUL gocdb both 1 1 RHUL None Should usage be LCG? -
T3_UK_SGrid_Oxford UKI-SOUTHGRID-OX-HEP gocdb both 1 1 Oxford LCG - -
T3_UK_ScotGrid_ECDF UKI-SCOTGRID-ECDF gocdb both 1 1 ECDF None Should usage be LCG? -
T3_UK_ScotGrid_GLA UKI-SCOTGRID-GLASGOW gocdb both 1 1 UKI-SCOTGRID-GLASGOW None Should usage be LCG? -
T3_US_ANL Argonne none siteDB 1 1 Argonne OSG This might be ANLASC on OIM. If so, OSG usage is consistent. -
T3_US_BU T3_US_BU none siteDB T3_US_BU OSG 1 1 This might be BU_ATLAS_Tier2 (Atlas site on Boston University).
Given that we have created a physical site T3_US_BU in core, the OSG usage is not consistent, as the site is not in OIM.
create a peer in core
T3_US_Baylor Baylor-Kodiak oim both 1 1 Baylor University Tier3 None Should usage be OSG? -
T3_US_Brown brown-cms-new oim both 1 1 Brown-CMS OSG - -
T3_US_Colorado UColorado_HEP oim both 1 1 Colorado OSG - -
T3_US_Cornell NYSGRID_CORNELL_NYS1 oim both 1 1 Cornell OSG - -
T3_US_FIT FLTECH oim both 1 1 FLTECH OSG - -
T3_US_FIU FIUPG oim both 1 1 T3_US_FIU OSG - -
T3_US_FNALLPC USCMS-FNAL-LPC none both FNALLPC OSG 1 1 USCMS-FNAL-LPC site is not in OIM. What does OSG usage mean here? -
T3_US_FSU FSU-HEP oim both 1 1 T3_US_FSU OSG - -
T3_US_HEPCloud T3USHEPCLOUD none both 1 1 T3_US_HEPCloud other T3USHEPCLOUD site is not in OIM. The “other” usage could be therefore consistent, provided that we decide what it means. -
T3_US_JHU T3_US_JHU none siteDB 1 1 JHU OSG T3_US_JHU site is not in OIM. What does OSG usage mean here? -
T3_US_Kansas T3_US_Kansas none siteDB 1 1 Kansas None - -
T3_US_MIT MIT_CMS_T3 oim both 1 1 T3 US MIT OSG - -
T3_US_Minnesota UMN-CMS oim both 1 1 Minnesota Unknown Should usage be OSG? -
T3_US_NERSC t3usnersc none siteDB 1 1 T3 US NERSC OSG There are 8 sites in OIM resembling to this one ( e.g. NERSC-ITB, NERSC-Carver, NERSC-Franklin etc). If the CMS site is linked to any of them, the OSG usage is consistent. -
T3_US_NEU Northeastern none siteDB 1 1 Northeastern OSG This is mapped to T3_US_NEU on OIM in CRIC. With this, the OSG usage is consistent. I believe this has to be corrected on the source and mapped to T3_US_NEU in core
T3_US_NU NU Tier3 none both 1 1 Northwestern OSG This should be mapped to NU_CMS_TIER3_CE on OIM in CRIC. With this, the OSG usage is consistent. -
T3_US_NotreDame NWICG_NDCMS oim both 1 1 NWICG_NDCMS OSG - -
T3_US_OSG T3USOSG none siteDB 7 1 T3_US_OSG OSG T3USOSG site is not in OIM. We created it in core CRIC, so the OSG usage is not consistent. -
T3_US_OSG Clemson-Palmetto oim VOFeed 7 1 - - - map to T3USOSG (to be created in core) as all other entries for this site
T3_US_OSG SU-OG-CE1 none VOFeed 7 1 - - - -
T3_US_OSG MWT2 oim VOFeed 7 1 - - - -
T3_US_OSG BNL-ATLAS both VOFeed 7 1 - - - -
T3_US_OSG AGLT2 oim VOFeed 7 1 - - - -
T3_US_OSG SU-OG-CE none VOFeed 7 1 - - - -
T3_US_OSU osu-cms oim both 1 1 OSU None Should usage be OSG? -
T3_US_Omaha Firefly oim both 1 1 Firefly OSG - This entry will soon disappear.
T3_US_Princeton_ARM T3_US_Princeton_ARM none both 1 1 Princeton ARM OSG T3_US_Princeton_ARM site is not in OIM. What does OSG usage mean here? -
T3_US_Princeton_ICSE T3_US_Princeton_ICSE none both 1 1 Princeton ARM None This is mapped to Princeton_ICSE_T3_CMS on OIM in CRIC. Should usage be now OSG? map to Princeton_ICSE_T3_CMS , might be an error
T3_US_PuertoRico uprm-cms oim both 1 1 UPRM OSG - -
T3_US_Rice Rice oim both 1 1 Rice OSG - -
T3_US_Rutgers rutgers-cms oim both 1 1 Rutgers OSG - -
T3_US_SDSC t3ussdsc none siteDB 2 1 T3 US SDSC OSG t3ussdsc site is not in OIM. We created it in core CRIC, so the OSG usage is not consistent. -
T3_US_SDSC Comet none VOFeed 2 1 - - - map to t3ussdsc
T3_US_TACC t3ustacc none siteDB 2 1 T3_US_TACC other We mapped it to the CRIC created t3ussdsc, so now we have both OSG and other as usage for it. Is this expected? Or should we create t3ustacc entry? map to t3ussdsc
T3_US_TACC Stampede none VOFeed 2 1 - - - -
T3_US_TAMU TAMU_BRAZOS oim both 2 1 - TAMU OSG This is the currently used mapping since we are not yet using VOFeed to populate the db.
T3_US_TAMU TAMU_BRAZOS_CE none VOFeed 2 1 - - TAMU_BRAZOS exists in OIM but not TAMU_BRAZOS_CE map to TAMU_BRAZOS
T3_US_TTU TTU-ANTAEUS oim both 1 1 TTU OSG - -
T3_US_UB NYSGRID-CCR-U2 oim siteDB 1 1 SUNY_BUFFALO OSG - -
T3_US_UCD UCD oim both 1 1 UCD OSG - -
T3_US_UCR UCR-HEP oim both 1 1 UC Riverside OSG - -
T3_US_UCSB ucsb-cms oim both 1 1 UCSB OSG - -
T3_US_UIowa GROW-PROD oim siteDB 1 1 UIowa OSG - -
T3_US_UMD umd-cms oim both 2 1 UMD OSG - This is the currently used mapping since we are not yet using VOFeed to populate the db.
T3_US_UMD umd-ce none VOFeed 2 1 - - UMD-IGS-CE appears as a resource of UMD-IGS but also umd-ce appears as a resource of umd-cms (on OIM). map to umd-cms
T3_US_UMiss UMissHEP oim both 1 1 UMissHEP OSG - -
T3_US_UTENN T3_US_UTENN none siteDB 1 1 UTenn None - -
T3_US_UVA UVA-HEP none both 1 1 UVA None Appears as a SRMv2 SE resource on the physical site uva-cms-se in OIM. -
T3_US_Vanderbilt_EC2 Vanderbilt_EC2 oim both 1 1 Vanderbilt_EC2 OSG - -
T3_US_Wisconsin t3uswisconsin none siteDB 1 1 T3 US Wisconsin OSG t3uswisconsin is not in OIM. What does OSG usage mean here? -
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r1 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r1 - 2018-02-05 - PanosPaparrigopoulos
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    LCG All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright &© 2008-2019 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback