LHCHWGHiggsJets < LHCPhysics

LHCPhysics Web>LHCHXSWG1>LHCHWGHiggsJets (2014-11-04, ReiTanaka) (raw view)

---+ Jets subgroup

%TOC%

---++ Goal of the group

---++ Group Contacts

Daniele del Re (CMS)

Bruce Mellado (ATLAS)

Gavin Salam (Theory)

Frank Tackmann (Theory)

---++ Available Tools

---++ Settings for comparison studies
---+++ H+2-jet NLO+shower comparison study
<pre>Process/Inputs:
===============

* pure gg -&gt; H + 2j NLO+shower at parton level

* m_H = 125 GeV
* \sqrt{s} = 8 TeV
* strict mtop -&gt; \infty limit (no mtop rescaling or bottom interference)
* on-shell stable Higgs
* MSTW2008 NLO PDFs (68CL) (always also at LO)
  with its alphas(mZ) = 0.12018, nf = 5, 2-loop running
* \mu_r = \mu_f = \mu = m_H in (N)LO hard matrix element corrections


Jet cuts:
=========

(\eta is pseudorapidity, y is rapidity)

a) Jet selection:
* anti-kT with R = 0.4
* at least two jets with pTj &gt; 25 GeV and |\eta_j| &lt; 5

b) VBF cuts:
* \delta y_jj = |y_j1 - y_j2| &gt; 2.8
* m_jj &gt; 400 GeV


Distributions:
==============

All distributions with
* only cuts a) and cuts a)+b)
* at LO and NLO each with \mu = {2 m_H, m_H, m_H/2}

1) pTj1 [0, 300] in steps of 5 GeV
2) pTj2  [0, 300] in steps of 5 GeV
3) yj1 [-5, 5] in steps of 0.5
4) yj2 [-5, 5] in steps of 0.5
5) |\delta\y_jj| [0,10] in steps of 0.5
6) m_jj [0, 1000] in steps of 40 GeV

7) \Delta\phi_jj [0, Pi] in steps of Pi/20
8) pTj3 [0, 300] in steps of 5 GeV
9) yj3 [-5, 5] in steps of 0.5

10) |eta_H - 0.5(\eta_j1 + \eta_j2)| [0,10] in steps of 0.5
11) pT_{Hjj} = |\vec{p}_{TH} + \vec{p}_{Tj1} + \vec{p}_{Tj2}| [0, 300] in steps of 5 GeV
12) Pi - \Delta\phi_{H,jj} [0, 1.5] in steps of 0.05</pre>


---++ Results

First comparisons can be found [[http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=223263][here]].

---++ Guidelines for UE related uncertainties

The following are guidelines for the estimation of UE related uncertainties in ggF and VBF processes:

1) Turn UE on/off for the nominal default tune  (expect ~10-20% variations depending on selection cuts and tune)

2) Cross check on/off effect for alternative tunes (that are also
deemed "reasonable")

3) Cross checks can include the use of tunes 
performed within a common framework but using different PDFs (eg. NLO v. 
LO, as is the case with AU2-CT10 and AU2-CTEQ6L1)

First studies can be found [[http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=232206][here]] and these studies will continue past 
the Moriond conferences. Until these guidelines can be implemented, the 
following temporary uncertainties are suggested:

1) For ggF+2j use 30% uncertainty

2) For VBF use 7% uncertainty

These uncertainties pertain to the normalization of both samples in the loose and tight VBF categories.

---++ References

---++ Meetings
   * [[http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=191210][18/05/12]]
   * [[http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=211870][12/10/12]]
   * [[http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=218887][29/11/12]]
   * [[http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=223263][20/12/12]]
   * [[http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=232206][08/02/13]]
   * [[http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=231636][25/01/13]]

---++ Links

-- Main.ReiTanaka - 02-May-2012

Topic revision: r7 - 2014-11-04 - ReiTanaka

LHCPhysics

LHCPhysics Web

LHCPhysics.Higgs

Public webs

- Cern Search
- TWiki Search
- Google Search
LHCPhysics All webs

Copyright &© 2008-2023 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback