LHCTopWG Summary Plots

Standalone Summary Plots

Provided by the LHC Top Working Group © 2019 CERN for the benefit of the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations. Reproduction of the figures on this page is allowed as specified in the CC-BY-4.0 license.

Pair production cross section

Figure Description
Summary of LHC and Tevatron measurements of the top-pair production cross-section as a function of the centre-of-mass energy compared to the NNLO QCD calculation complemented with NNLL resummation (top++2.0). The theory band represents uncertainties due to renormalisation and factorisation scale, parton density functions and the strong coupling. The measurements and the theory calculation are quoted at mtop=172.5 GeV. Measurements made at the same centre-of-mass energy are slightly offset for clarity.
PNG
PDF

November 2022

This and previous plot versions

Top-pair cross-section measurements at 5.02 TeV by the ATLAS and CMS collaborations. The band shows the NNLO QCD calculation complemented with NNLL resummation (top++2.0). The theory band represents uncertainties due to renormalisation and factorisation scale, parton density functions and the strong coupling. The measurements and the theory calculation is quoted at mtop=172.5 GeV. The upper part of the figure shows early LHC measurements and their combination. The lower part summarizes measurements performed after the LHC cross-section combination.
PNG
PDF

November 2022

This and previous plot versions

Top-pair cross-section measurements at 7 TeV by the ATLAS and CMS collaborations. The band shows the NNLO QCD calculation complemented with NNLL resummation (top++2.0). The theory band represents uncertainties due to renormalisation and factorisation scale, parton density functions and the strong coupling. The measurements and the theory calculation is quoted at mtop=172.5 GeV. The upper part of the figure shows early LHC measurements and their combination. The lower part summarizes measurements performed after the LHC cross-section combination.
PNG
PDF

June 2022

This and previous plot versions

Summary of measurements of the top-pair production cross-section at 8 TeV compared to the exact NNLO QCD calculation complemented with NNLL resummation (top++2.0). The theory band represents uncertainties due to renormalisation and factorisation scale, parton density functions and the strong coupling. The measurements and the theory calculation are quoted at mtop=172.5 GeV.
PNG
PDF

June 2022

This and previous plot versions
Same, for mtop=173.34 GeV, only older plot versions available

Summary of measurements of the top-pair production cross-section at 13 TeV compared to the exact NNLO QCD calculation complemented with NNLL resummation (top++2.0). The theory band represents uncertainties due to renormalisation and factorisation scale, parton density functions and the strong coupling. The measurements and the theory calculation are quoted at mtop=172.5 GeV.
PNG
PDF

November 2022

This and previous plot versions

Pair production differential cross sections

Figure Description
Full phase-space normalised differential ttbar cross-section as a function of the invariant mass of the top-quark pair. The CMS and ATLAS results are compared to NNLO and NLO+NNLL calculations. The values for the top-quark mass (mtop), the renormalisation (muR) and factorisation (muF) scales, and the choice of the PDF set used in each calculation are provided. Both the CMS and ATLAS measurements are performed assuming a top-quark mass value of 172.5 GeV. The shaded bands show the total uncertainty on the data measurements in each bin. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data measurements and the NLO+NNLL calculation to the NNLO calculation.
PNG
PDF

November 2017

This and previous plot versions

Full phase-space normalised differential ttbar cross-section as a function of the invariant mass of the top-quark pair. The CMS and ATLAS results are compared to predictions from the Powheg+Herwig6 and Powheg+Pythia8 MC generators. The MC samples are generated with the settings described in arXiv: 1511.04716. The shaded bands show the total uncertainty on the data measurements in each bin. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data measurements and the Powheg+Pythia8 prediction to the Powheg +Herwig6 prediction.
PNG
PDF

November 2017

This and previous plot versions

Full phase-space normalised differential ttbar cross-section as a function of the invariant mass of the top-quark pair. The CMS and ATLAS results are compared to the NLO and NNLO calculations from arXiv:1606.03350. The values for the top-quark mass (mtop), the renormalisation (muR) and factorisation (muF) scales, and the choice of the PDF set used in each calculation are provided. Both the CMS and ATLAS measurements are performed assuming a top-quark mass value of 172.5 GeV. The shaded bands show the total uncertainty on the data measurements in each bin. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data measurements and NLO calculation to the NNLO calculation.
PNG
PDF

November 2017

This and previous plot versions

Full phase-space normalised differential ttbar cross-section as a function of the invariant mass of the top-quark pair. The CMS and ATLAS results are compared to the NNLO calculation. The values for the top-quark mass (mtop), the renormalisation (muR) and factorisation (muF) scales, and the choice of the PDF set used in the calculation are provided. Both the CMS and ATLAS measurements are performed assuming a top-quark mass value of 172.5 GeV. The shaded bands show the total uncertainty on the data measurements in each bin. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data measurements to the NNLO calculation.
PNG
PDF

November 2017

This and previous plot versions

Full phase-space normalised differential ttbar cross-section as a function of the transverse momentum of the top quark. The CMS and ATLAS results are compared to NNLO and approximate NNLO calculations. The values for the top-quark mass (mtop), the renormalisation (muR) and factorisation (muF) scales, and the choice of the PDF set used in each calculation are provided. The variable mT is defined as the square root of the sum of the squares of top-quark mass and the transverse momentum of the top quark. Both the CMS and ATLAS measurements are performed assuming a top-quark mass value of 172.5 GeV. The shaded bands show the total uncertainty on the data measurements in each bin. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data measurements and the approximate NNLO calculations to the full NNLO calculation.
PNG
PDF

November 2017

This and previous plot versions

Full phase-space normalised differential ttbar cross-section as a function of the transverse momentum of the top quark. The CMS and ATLAS results are compared to predictions from the Powheg+Herwig6 and Powheg+Pythia8 MC generators. The MC samples are generated with the settings described in arXiv:1511.04716. The shaded bands show the total uncertainty on the data measurements in each bin. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data measurements and the Powheg+Pythia8 prediction to the Powheg +Herwig6 prediction.
PNG
PDF

November 2017

This and previous plot versions

Full phase-space normalised differential ttbar cross-section as a function of the transverse momentum of the top quark. The CMS and ATLAS results are compared to the NLO and NNLO calculations from arXiv:1606.03350. The values for the top-quark mass (mtop), the renormalisation (muR) and factorisation (muF) scales, and the choice of the PDF set used in each calculation are provided. The variable mT is defined as the square root of the sum of the squares of top-quark mass and the transverse momentum of the top quark. Both the CMS and ATLAS measurements are performed assuming a top-quark mass value of 172.5 GeV. The shaded bands show the total uncertainty on the data measurements in each bin. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data measurements and the NLO calculation to the NNLO calculation.
PNG
PDF

November 2017

This and previous plot versions

Full phase-space normalised differential ttbar cross-section as a function of the transverse momentum of the top quark. The CMS and ATLAS results are compared to the NNLO calculation. The values for the top-quark mass (mtop), the renormalisation (muR) and factorisation (muF) scales, and the choice of the PDF set used in the calculation are provided. The variable mT is defined as the square root of the sum of the squares of top-quark mass and the transverse momentum of the top quark. Both the CMS and ATLAS measurements are performed assuming a top-quark mass value of 172.5 GeV. The shaded bands show the total uncertainty on the data measurements in each bin. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data measurements to the NNLO calculation.
PNG
PDF

November 2017

This and previous plot versions

Full phase-space normalised differential ttbar cross-section as a function of the transverse momentum of the top-quark pair. The CMS and ATLAS results are compared to predictions from the Powheg+Herwig6 and Powheg+Pythia8 MC generators. The MC samples are generated with the settings described in arXiv:1511.04716. The shaded bands show the total uncertainty on the data measurements in each bin. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data measurements and the Powheg+Pythia8 prediction to the Powheg +Herwig6 prediction.
PNG
PDF

November 2017

This and previous plot versions

Single Top Quark Production

Figure Description
Summary of the ATLAS and CMS Collaboration measurements of the single top production cross-sections in the t-channel at 7 TeV. The measurements are compared to a theoretical calculation based on NLO QCD computed assuming a top mass of 172.5 GeV.
PNG
PDF

September 2019

This and previous plot versions

Summary of the ATLAS and CMS Collaboration measurements of the single top production cross-sections in the t-channel at 8 TeV. The measurements are compared to a theoretical calculation based on NLO QCD computed assuming a top mass of 172.5 GeV.
PNG
PDF

September 2019

This and previous plot versions

Summary of the ATLAS and CMS Collaboration measurements of the single top production cross-sections in the t-channel at 13 TeV. The measurements are compared to a theoretical calculation based on NLO QCD computed assuming a top mass of 172.5 GeV.
PNG
PDF

November 2020

This and previous plot versions

Cross-section measurements for the associated production of a top quark and a W boson performed by ATLAS and CMS at 7 TeV, and combined result compared with the NLO+NNLL prediction (gray bands). Statistical and total uncertainties are represented by red and blue error bars, respectively. The uncertainties in the theoretical prediction are represented by dark and light gray bands for renormalisation / factorisation scale and PDF (evaluated using MSTW2008), respectively.
PNG
PDF

September 2019

This and previous plot versions

Cross-section measurements for the associated production of a top quark and a W boson performed by ATLAS and CMS at 8 TeV, and combined result compared with the NLO+NNLL prediction (gray bands). Statistical and total uncertainties are represented by red and blue error bars, respectively. The uncertainties in the theoretical prediction are represented by dark and light gray bands for renormalisation / factorisation scale and PDF (evaluated using MSTW2008), respectively.
PNG
PDF

September 2021

This and previous plot versions

Cross-section measurements for the associated production of a top quark and a W boson performed by ATLAS and CMS at 13 TeV, and combined result compared with the NLO+NNLL prediction (gray bands). Statistical and total uncertainties are represented by red and blue error bars, respectively. The uncertainties in the theoretical prediction are represented by dark and light gray bands for renormalisation / factorisation scale and PDF (evaluated using MSTW2008), respectively.
PNG
PDF

November 2022

This and previous plot versions

Summary of ATLAS and CMS measurements of the single top production cross-sections in various channels as a function of the center of mass energy. The measurements are compared to theoretical calculations based on: NLO QCD, NLO QCD complemented with NNLL resummation and NNLO QCD (t-channel only).
PNG
PDF

November 2022

This and previous plot versions

Summary of the ATLAS and CMS extractions of the CKM matrix element Vtb from single top quark measurements. For each result, the contribution to the total uncertainty originating from the uncertainty on the theoretical prediction for the single top production cross-section is shown along with the uncertainty originating from the experimental measurement of the cross-section.
PNG
PDF

November 2020

This and previous plot versions

Summary of the ATLAS and CMS measurements of Rt, the ratio of the t-channel top-quark production cross-section to the t-channel anti-top-quark production cross-section. The data measurements are compared to NLO QCD calculations using the CT14, NNPDF 3.0 and MMHT2014 PDF sets. The coloured bands represent the uncertainties on the theoretical predictions (scale and PDF uncertainties).
PNG
PDF

November 2020

This and previous plot versions

Summary of the ATLAS and CMS measurements of Rt, the ratio of the t-channel top-quark production cross-section to the t-channel anti-top-quark production cross-section. The data measurements are compared to NLO QCD calculations using the ABM, HERAPDF 2.0 and JR14 PDF sets. The coloured bands represent the uncertainties on the theoretical predictions (scale and PDF uncertainties).
PNG
PDF

November 2020

This and previous plot versions

Associated tt+X Production

Figure Description
Summary of ATLAS and CMS measurements of ttbarX (X=W, Z or γ) cross sections at 13 TeV. The ttbarW and ttbarZ cross section measurements are compared to the NLO QCD and EW theoretical calculation complemented with NNLL resummation, while the ttbarγ cross section measurement is compared to the NLO QCD theoretical calculation. "Vis 1", "Vis 2", and "Vis 3" highlight that the relevant phase space used for the ATLAS and CMS ttbarγ measurements are different. The theory prediction and experimental result of the ATLAS measurement ttbarγ+tWγ process is multiplied by a factor 20, and the result for the CMS is multiplied by a factor of 5 to allow for easy visualization on the same scale. The theory band represents uncertainties due to renormalisation and factorisation scales and parton density functions. Complementary theory predictions for the ttbarW and ttbarZ processes are also available in: A. Broggio et al., JHEP 08 (2019) 039 and arXiv:1610.07922.
PNG
PDF

November 2022

This and previous plot versions

Associated t+X Production

Figure Description
Summary of ATLAS and CMS measurements of tX (X=Z or γ) cross sections at 13 TeV. The cross section measurements are compared to the NLO QCD theoretical calculation. "Vis 1" and "Vis 2" highlight that the relevant phase space used for the ATLAS and CMS tqγ measurements are different. The theory prediction and experimental results of tZq, and those of tqγ for the CMS are multiplied by a factor of 5 to allow for easy visualization on the same scale. The theory band represents uncertainties due to renormalization and factorization scales and parton density functions.
PNG
PDF

June 2022

This and previous plot versions

Four Top Quark Production

Figure Description
Summary of ATLAS and CMS measurements of the ttbarttbar production cross section at 13 TeV in various channels. The cross section measurements are compared to the NLO QCD and EW theoretical calculation. The theory band represents uncertainties due to renormalisation and factorisation scales. Complementary theory predictions are also available in: R. Frederix et al., JHEP 02 (2018) 031.
PNG
PDF

November 2022

This and previous plot versions

Top EFT

Figure Description
Summary of the 95% confidence level observed limits on the effective field theory Wilson coefficients of the dimension-6 operators related to (top) quark interaction with vector bosons, as obtained by the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations. The results are reported as individual constraints assuming new physics contributions from one specific operator at a time. Interpretations use the SMEFT framework and the Warsaw basis. The formalism is employed at different levels of the experimental analyses, from the interpretation of measured observables to a comparison of the data to simulations at the detector level. Most interpretations follow the LHCtopWG recommendations from arXiv:1802.07237. In the measurement arXiv:2202.12134, the limit is derived for the coefficient CtG normalised with the strong coupling, gS, as implemented in SMEFT@NLO.
PNG
PDF

November 2022

This and previous plot versions

Summary of the 95% confidence level observed limits on the effective field theory Wilson coefficients of the dimension-6 operators related to four-fermion interactions, as obtained by the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations. The results are reported as individual constraints assuming new physics contributions from one specific operator at a time. Interpretations use the SMEFT framework and the Warsaw basis. The formalism is employed at different levels of the experimental analyses, from the interpretation of measured observables to a comparison of the data to simulations at the detector level. Most interpretations follow the LHCtopWG recommendations from arXiv:1802.07237.
PNG
PDF

November 2022

This and previous plot versions

Summary of the 95% confidence level observed limits on the effective field theory Wilson coefficients of the dimension-6 operators related to interactions involving top quarks, as obtained by the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations. The results are reported as marginalised constraints, treating all Wilson coefficients contributing to a given process as free parameters. The effect of a given Wilson coefficient is considered in multiple processes, where indicated in the references, and across multiple bins of differential measurements. Each row presents all the marginalised constraints obtained from a single fit. Interpretations use the SMEFT framework and the Warsaw basis. The formalism is employed at different levels of the experimental analyses, from the interpretation of measured observables to a comparison of the data to simulations at the detector level. Most interpretations follow the LHCtopWG recommendations from arXiv:1802.07237.
PNG
PDF

November 2022

This and previous plot versions

Summary of the 95% confidence level observed limits on the effective field theory Wilson coefficients of the dimension-6 operators related FCNC, as obtained by the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations. The results are reported as individual constraints assuming new physics contributions from one specific operator at a time. Interpretations use the SMEFT framework and the Warsaw basis. The formalism is employed at different levels of the experimental analyses, from the interpretation of measured observables to a comparison of the data to simulations at the detector level. Most interpretations follow the LHCtopWG recommendations from arXiv:1802.07237. The definitions of operators OuG and OcG are different in the two searches from references EPJC 82 (2022) 334 and EPJC 79 (2019) 886. For comparison purposes in this plot, the limits for coefficients CuG and CcG from Ref. EPJC 82 (2022) 334 are multiplied by factor gS(mtop2)/2=0.57 to be compatible with the definition used in Ref. EPJC 79 (2019) 886 as it is recommended in Ref. arXiv:1802.07237.
PNG
PDF

November 2022

This and previous plot versions

Top Charge Asymmetry

Figure Description
Summary of the charge asymmetry measurements on ATLAS and CMS at 7 TeV showing both the ttbar-based and lepton-based asymmetry measurements, compared to the respective theory predictions. The uncertainty on the theory predictions is shown but is very small.
PNG
PDF

November 2017

This and previous plot versions

Summary of the charge asymmetry measurements on ATLAS and CMS at 8 TeV showing both the inclusive measurements and the measurement using boosted events which is restricted to Mtt >0.75 TeV and abs(delta(abs(y))) <2, compared to the respective theory predictions. The uncertainty on the theory predictions is shown but is very small. This plot is an auxiliary figure from the ATLAS+CMS charge asymmetry combination paper
PNG
PDF

September 2017

This and previous plot versions

W boson helicity

Figure Description
Summary of measured W helicity fractions by ATLAS and CMS at 7 and 8 TeV, compared to the respective theory predictions. The uncertainty on the theory predictions is shown but is very small.
PNG
PDF

November 2022

This and previous plot versions

Combination of 8 TeV results (May 2020) can be found here

Spin Correlation

Figure Description
ATLAS and CMS data compared to Powheg-Box+Pythia8 Monte Carlo Simulation from ATLAS and CMS as well as calculations at next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) in perturbative QCD. The ATLAS and CMS data are corrected to parton level using Iterative Bayesian Unfolding and regularised TUnfold, respectively.
PNG
PDF

November 2020

This and previous plot versions

ATLAS and CMS data compared to Monte Carlo Simulation samples from the ATLAS and CMS collaborations. The ratio is with respect to Powheg-Box+Pythia8 from ATLAS (Pwg+P8). The ATLAS and CMS data are corrected to parton level using Iterative Bayesian Unfolding and regularised TUnfold, respectively.
PNG
PDF

November 2020

This and previous plot versions

Flavour Changing Neutral Current decays

Figure Description
Summary of the current 95% confidence level observed limits on the branching ratios of the top quark decays via flavour changing neutral currents (FCNC) to a quark and a neutral boson t->Xq (X=g, Z, γ or H; q=u or c) by the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations compared to several new physics models. Each limit assumes that all other FCNC processes vanish.
PNG
PDF

November 2022

This and previous plot versions

Summary of the current 95% confidence level observed limits on the branching ratios of the top quark decays via flavour changing neutral currents (FCNC) to a charm quark and a neutral boson t->Xc (X=g, Z, γ or H). The coloured lines represent the results from HERA (the most stringent limits between the ones obtained by the H1 and ZEUS collaborations, in brown), LEP (combined ALEPH, DELPHI, L3 and OPAL collaborations result, in green), TEVATRON (the most stringent limits between the ones obtained by the CDF and D0 collaborations, in grey). The yellow area represents the region excluded by the individual ATLAS and the CMS Collaborations standalone, no statistical combinations between any LHC measurements are performed. Each limit assumes that all other FCNC processes vanish. The limits are expressed as FCNC top decay branching ratios, but several are obtained considering both FCNC top quark decay and FCNC top quark production vertices.
PNG
PDF

November 2022

This and previous plot versions

Summary of the current 95% confidence level observed limits on the branching ratios of the top quark decays via flavour changing neutral currents (FCNC) to an up quark and a neutral boson t->Xu (X=g, Z, γ or H). The coloured lines represent the results from HERA (the most stringent limits between the ones obtained by the H1 and ZEUS collaborations, in brown), LEP (combined ALEPH, DELPHI, L3 and OPAL collaborations result, in green), TEVATRON (the most stringent limits between the ones obtained by the CDF and D0 collaborations, in grey). The yellow area represents the region excluded by the individual ATLAS and the CMS Collaborations standalone, no statistical combinations between any LHC measurements are performed. Each limit assumes that all other FCNC processes vanish. The limits are expressed as FCNC top decay branching ratios, but several are obtained considering both FCNC top quark decay and FCNC top quark production vertices.
PNG
PDF

November 2022

This and previous plot versions

Top Quark Mass

Figure Description
Summary of the ATLAS and CMS measurements from top quark decay (``direct"). The results are compared with the LHC and Tevatron+LHC mtop combinations. For each measurement, the statistical uncertainty, the jet scale factor (JSF) and b-jet scale factor (bJSF) contributions (when applicable) as well as the sum of the remaining uncertainties are reported separately. The JSF, bJSF contributions are statistical in nature and apply to analyses performing in-situ (top quark pair base) jet energy calibration procedures.
PNG
PDF

October 2022

This and previous plot versions

Summary of the ATLAS and CMS measurements of the top quark mass from tt̄ production observables. The breakdown of uncertainties is reported only for the analyses that provide such information. The results are compared with the ATLAS and CMS combination of measurements from top quark decay. The top quark mass extractions from differential measurements may receive sizeable corrections from Coulomb and soft-gluon resummation near the tt̄ production threshold that are not explicitly accounted for in the theoretical predictions.
PNG
PDF

June 2022

This and previous plot versions





Summary Plots in Publications

Figure Description
W helicity combination at 8 TeV http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.03799
The combination of measurements of the W boson polarization in top quark decays performed by the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations is presented. The measurements are based on proton-proton collision data produced at the LHC at a centre-of-mass energy of 8 TeV, and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of about 20 fb-1 for each experiment. The measurements used events containing one lepton and having different jet multiplicities in the final state. The results are quoted as fractions of W bosons with longitudinal (F0), left-handed (FL), or right-handed (FR) polarizations. The resulting combined measurements of the polarization fractions are F0 = 0.693 +- 0.014 and FL = 0.315 +- 0.011. The fraction FR is calculated from the unitarity constraint to be FR = -0.008 +- 0.007. These results are in agreement with the standard model predictions at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative quantum chromodynamics and represent an improvement in precision of 25 (29)\% for F0 (FL) with respect to the most precise single measurement. A limit on anomalous right-handed vector (VR), and left- and right-handed tensor (gL, gR) tWb couplings is set while fixing all others to their standard model values. The allowed regions are [-0.11,0.16] for VR, [-0.08, 0.05] for gL, and [-0.04, 0.02] for gR, at 95\% confidence level. Limits on the corresponding Wilson coefficients are also derived.
PNG
PDF

May 2020

More Plots ATLAS link

More Plots CMS link
Figure Description
Charge Asymmetry at 7 and 8 TeV http://arxiv.org/abs/1709.05327
This paper presents combinations of inclusive and differential measurements of the charge asymmetry (AC) in top quark pair (ttbar) events with a lepton+jets signature by the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, using data from LHC proton-proton collisions at centre-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 TeV corresponding to integrated luminosities of about 5 and 20 fb-1 for each experiment, respectively. The resulting combined LHC measurements of the inclusive charge asymmetry are AC = 0.005 +- 0.007 (stat) +- 0.006 (syst) at 7 TeV and AC = 0.0055 +- 0.0023 (stat) +- 0.0025 (syst) at 8 TeV. These values, as well as the combination of AC measurements as a function of the invariant mass of the ttbar system at 8 TeV, are consistent with the respective standard model predictions.
PNG
PDF

September 2017

More Plots ATLAS link

More Plots CMS link
Figure Description
Vtb at 7 and 8 TeV https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.07158
This paper presents the combinations of single-top-quark production cross-section measurements by the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, using data from LHC proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s)=7 and 8 TeV corresponding to integrated luminosities of 1.17 to 5.1 fb-1 at sqrt(s)=7 TeV, and 12.2 to 20.3 fb-1 at sqrt(s)=8 TeV. These combinations are performed per centre-of-mass energy and for each production mode: t-channel, tW, and s-channel. The combined t-channel cross-sections are 67.5 +- 5.7 pb and 87.7 +- 5.8 pb at sqrt(s)=7 and 8 TeV respectively. The combined tW cross-sections are 16.3 +- 5.7 pb and 23.1 +- 3.6 pb at sqrt(s)=7 and 8 TeV respectively. For the s-channel cross-section, the combination yields 4.9 +- 1.4 pb at sqrt(s)=8 TeV. The square of the magnitude of the CKM matrix element Vtb multiplied by a form factor fLVis determined for each production mode and centre-of-mass energy, using the ratio of the measured cross-section to its theoretical prediction. It is assumed that the top-quark-related CKM matrix elements obey the relation |Vtd|,|Vts| << |Vtb|. All the |fLV Vtb|2 determinations, extracted from individual ratios at sqrt(s)=7 and 8 TeV, are combined, resulting in |fLV Vtb|=1.02 +- 0.04 (meas.) +- 0.02 (theo.). All combined measurements are consistent with their corresponding Standard Model predictions.
PNG
PDF

February 2019

More Plots ATLAS link

More Plots CMS link

Summary Plots in Combination Notes

A full List of public LHCTopWG documents is available on the LPCC Web Page

Please note that in many cases the summary plots in the notes are superseded by Standalone Plots containing additional new ATLAS and CMS measurements

Figure Description
Top Quark Mass -- world combination ATLAS-CONF-2014-008 ; CDF-NOTE-11071 ; CMS-PAS-TOP-13-014 ; D0-NOTE-6416 ; arXiv:1403.4427
Summary of top mass measurements by the ATLAS, CDF, CMS and D0 collaborations as of March 2014.
PNG
PDF

March 2014

More plots and document

This and previous versions of Top Mass notes and plots

Top Quark Pair Cross Section in e-mu channel at 8 TeV ATLAS-CONF-2014-054; CMS-PAS-TOP-14-016
Combination of top pair production cross section measurements at 8 TeV. The measurements and the theory calculation are quoted at mtop=172.5 GeV.
PNG
PDF

September 2014

More Plots and Document

Top Quark Pair Cross Section at 7 TeV ATLAS-CONF-2012-134 ; CMS-PAS-TOP-12-003
Combination of top pair production cross section measurements at 7 TeV. The measurements and the theory calculation are quoted at mtop=172.5 GeV.
PNG
PDF

September 2012

Document

W boson polarization in top-quark decays at 7 TeV ATLAS-CONF-2013-033 ; CMS-PAS-TOP-12-025
Combination of W helicity measurements at 7 TeV.
PNG
PDF

March 2014

More plots and document

Charge Asymmetry at 7 TeV ATLAS-CONF-2014-012 ; CMS-PAS-TOP-14-006
Combination of charge asymmetry measurements at 7 TeV.
PNG
PDF

March 2014

Document

Common Simulation

Common Samples plots Public note ATLAS ; Public note CMS
Common settings v2 (2022) ATLAS link, CMS link
Common settings v0.1 (2021) ATLAS link, CMS link
First comparison studies (2019) ATLAS link, CMS link

May 2019

Superseded plots and combinations

Single Top tW channel at 8 TeV ATLAS-CONF-2014-052; CMS-PAS-TOP-14-009
Superseded by Single top combination and Vtb extraction (ATLAS link, CMS link).
Single Top t channel at 8 TeV ATLAS-CONF-2013-098; CMS-PAS-TOP-12-002
Superseded by Single top combination and Vtb extraction (ATLAS link, CMS link).

-- MartijnMulders - 2015-05-14 -- ReinhardSchwienhorst - 2019-09-23 -- ReinhardSchwienhorst - 2019-11-13 -- MariaAldaya - 2020-09-15 -- MariaAldaya - 2020-09-21 -- MariaAldaya - 2021-03-31 -- MariaAldaya - 2021-05-28 -- MariaAldaya - 2021-10-07 -- MariaAldaya - 2022-02-03 -- MariaAldaya - 2022-04-04 -- MariaAldaya - 2022-07-06 -- WolfgangWagner - 2022-11-24 -- MariaAldaya - 2022-11-30

Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
PDFpdf AC_ttbar_pub_fig_02.pdf r1 manage 14.4 K 2018-04-05 - 15:41 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng AC_ttbar_pub_fig_02.png r1 manage 50.4 K 2018-04-05 - 15:41 MartijnMulders  
Unknown file formateps Ac_combination.eps r1 manage 0.3 K 2015-05-14 - 18:46 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf Ac_combination.pdf r1 manage 21.0 K 2015-05-14 - 18:46 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng Ac_combination.png r1 manage 19.2 K 2015-05-14 - 18:46 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf Ac_summary_7TeV_sep2015.pdf r1 manage 14.5 K 2015-11-10 - 14:51 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng Ac_summary_7TeV_sep2015.png r1 manage 57.4 K 2015-11-10 - 14:51 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf Ac_summary_8TeV_sep2016.pdf r1 manage 14.9 K 2016-09-20 - 21:27 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng Ac_summary_8TeV_sep2016.png r1 manage 259.0 K 2016-09-20 - 21:27 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf Ac_summary_8TeV_sep2017.pdf r1 manage 41.8 K 2017-09-26 - 18:35 MarkOwen  
PNGpng Ac_summary_8TeV_sep2017.png r1 manage 92.4 K 2017-09-26 - 18:35 MarkOwen  
PDFpdf Ac_summary_lhc7_nov2017.pdf r1 manage 14.7 K 2017-11-15 - 17:51 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng Ac_summary_lhc7_nov2017.png r1 manage 338.6 K 2017-11-15 - 17:51 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf Ac_summary_may15.pdf r1 manage 13.9 K 2015-05-25 - 11:41 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng Ac_summary_may15.png r1 manage 173.1 K 2015-05-25 - 11:41 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf CMS-TOP-19-004_Figure_002.pdf r1 manage 15.7 K 2020-09-21 - 16:33 MariaAldaya  
PNGpng CMS-TOP-19-004_Figure_002.png r1 manage 71.1 K 2020-09-21 - 16:33 MariaAldaya  
PDFpdf LHC_tW_8TeV.pdf r1 manage 14.3 K 2015-11-05 - 17:49 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng LHC_tW_8TeV.png r1 manage 40.9 K 2015-11-05 - 17:49 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf W_helicity_sep2016.pdf r1 manage 16.6 K 2016-09-20 - 21:36 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng W_helicity_sep2016.png r1 manage 289.6 K 2016-09-20 - 21:36 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf Whelicity.pdf r1 manage 5.4 K 2015-11-05 - 14:15 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng Whelicity.png r1 manage 60.3 K 2015-11-05 - 14:15 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf charge_asymmetry.pdf r1 manage 14.0 K 2015-05-14 - 18:46 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng charge_asymmetry.png r1 manage 119.0 K 2015-05-14 - 18:46 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf helicity_summary_nov2017.pdf r1 manage 16.6 K 2017-11-15 - 17:38 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng helicity_summary_nov2017.png r1 manage 482.5 K 2017-11-15 - 17:38 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf lhctopwg_ttxsec_13TeV_aug2016.pdf r1 manage 21.9 K 2016-08-04 - 16:15 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng lhctopwg_ttxsec_13TeV_aug2016.png r1 manage 171.1 K 2016-08-04 - 16:21 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf lhctopwg_ttxsec_13TeV_mar2016.pdf r1 manage 15.2 K 2016-04-04 - 17:26 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng lhctopwg_ttxsec_13TeV_mar2016.png r1 manage 38.7 K 2016-04-04 - 17:26 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf lhctopwg_ttxsec_13TeV_may2016.pdf r1 manage 16.0 K 2016-05-26 - 18:33 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng lhctopwg_ttxsec_13TeV_may2016.png r1 manage 229.1 K 2016-05-26 - 18:33 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf lhctopwg_ttxsec_13TeV_nov2016.pdf r1 manage 43.1 K 2016-11-23 - 17:20 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng lhctopwg_ttxsec_13TeV_nov2016.png r1 manage 63.0 K 2016-11-23 - 17:20 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf lhctopwg_ttxsec_7TeV_mar2016.pdf r1 manage 19.2 K 2016-04-04 - 18:58 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng lhctopwg_ttxsec_7TeV_mar2016.png r1 manage 55.6 K 2016-04-04 - 18:58 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf lhctopwg_ttxsec_7TeV_may2016.pdf r1 manage 19.8 K 2016-05-26 - 18:33 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng lhctopwg_ttxsec_7TeV_may2016.png r1 manage 304.2 K 2016-05-26 - 18:33 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf lhctopwg_ttxsec_8TeV_mar2016.pdf r1 manage 16.4 K 2016-04-04 - 18:58 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng lhctopwg_ttxsec_8TeV_mar2016.png r1 manage 51.1 K 2016-04-04 - 18:58 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf lhctopwg_ttxsec_8TeV_may2016.pdf r1 manage 16.9 K 2016-05-26 - 18:33 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng lhctopwg_ttxsec_8TeV_may2016.png r1 manage 264.1 K 2016-05-26 - 18:33 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf lhctopwg_ttxsec_8TeV_mtopwa_sep2015.pdf r1 manage 6.6 K 2015-11-10 - 14:38 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng lhctopwg_ttxsec_8TeV_mtopwa_sep2015.png r1 manage 167.3 K 2015-11-10 - 14:38 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf lhctopwg_ttxsec_sqrts_aug2016.pdf r1 manage 28.1 K 2016-08-04 - 16:35 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng lhctopwg_ttxsec_sqrts_aug2016.png r1 manage 123.6 K 2016-08-04 - 16:35 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf lhctopwg_ttxsec_sqrts_mar2016.pdf r1 manage 20.9 K 2016-03-22 - 15:23 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng lhctopwg_ttxsec_sqrts_mar2016.png r1 manage 163.0 K 2016-03-22 - 15:23 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf lhctopwg_ttxsec_sqrts_may2016.pdf r1 manage 21.1 K 2016-05-26 - 18:33 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng lhctopwg_ttxsec_sqrts_may2016.png r1 manage 293.3 K 2016-05-26 - 18:33 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf lhctopwg_ttxsec_sqrts_nov2015.pdf r1 manage 20.9 K 2015-11-20 - 15:53 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng lhctopwg_ttxsec_sqrts_nov2015.png r1 manage 470.3 K 2015-11-20 - 15:53 MartijnMulders  
Unknown file formateps lhctopwg_ttxsec_sqrts_sep2015.eps r1 manage 28.0 K 2015-10-19 - 17:40 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf lhctopwg_ttxsec_sqrts_sep2015.pdf r1 manage 20.9 K 2015-10-19 - 17:40 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng lhctopwg_ttxsec_sqrts_sep2015.png r1 manage 293.5 K 2015-10-19 - 17:40 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf ll_topH_pt_ll_rel_MC_nov17.pdf r1 manage 21.9 K 2017-11-15 - 14:52 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng ll_topH_pt_ll_rel_MC_nov17.png r1 manage 335.0 K 2017-11-15 - 15:03 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf ll_topH_pt_ll_rel_vscale_NLOvsNNLO_nov17.pdf r1 manage 22.0 K 2017-11-15 - 14:52 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng ll_topH_pt_ll_rel_vscale_NLOvsNNLO_nov17.png r1 manage 340.4 K 2017-11-15 - 15:03 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf ll_topH_pt_ll_rel_vscale_nov17.pdf r1 manage 22.4 K 2017-11-15 - 14:52 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng ll_topH_pt_ll_rel_vscale_nov17.png r1 manage 388.8 K 2017-11-15 - 15:03 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf ll_topH_pt_ll_rel_vscale_onlyNNLO_nov17.pdf r1 manage 21.7 K 2017-11-15 - 14:52 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng ll_topH_pt_ll_rel_vscale_onlyNNLO_nov17.png r1 manage 302.0 K 2017-11-15 - 15:03 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf ll_tt_m_ll_rel_MC_nov17.pdf r1 manage 21.2 K 2017-11-15 - 14:52 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng ll_tt_m_ll_rel_MC_nov17.png r1 manage 312.0 K 2017-11-15 - 15:03 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf ll_tt_m_ll_rel_NLOvsNNLO_nov17.pdf r1 manage 21.3 K 2017-11-15 - 14:52 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng ll_tt_m_ll_rel_NLOvsNNLO_nov17.png r1 manage 314.1 K 2017-11-15 - 15:03 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf ll_tt_m_ll_rel_vscale_nov17.pdf r1 manage 21.4 K 2017-11-15 - 14:52 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng ll_tt_m_ll_rel_vscale_nov17.png r1 manage 321.3 K 2017-11-15 - 15:03 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf ll_tt_m_ll_rel_vscale_onlyNNLO_nov17.pdf r1 manage 21.0 K 2017-11-15 - 14:52 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng ll_tt_m_ll_rel_vscale_onlyNNLO_nov17.png r1 manage 280.8 K 2017-11-15 - 15:03 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf ll_tt_pt_ll_rel_MC_nov17.pdf r1 manage 21.4 K 2017-11-15 - 14:52 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng ll_tt_pt_ll_rel_MC_nov17.png r1 manage 324.6 K 2017-11-15 - 15:03 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf toplhcwg_ttxsec_13TeV_aug2016.pdf r1 manage 21.9 K 2016-08-04 - 16:10 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng toplhcwg_ttxsec_13TeV_aug2016.png r1 manage 171.1 K 2016-08-04 - 16:10 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf toplhcwg_ttxsec_7TeV.pdf r1 manage 49.4 K 2015-05-14 - 18:47 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng toplhcwg_ttxsec_7TeV.png r1 manage 242.0 K 2015-05-14 - 18:47 MartijnMulders  
Unknown file formateps toplhcwg_ttxsec_8TeV_may15.eps r1 manage 21.8 K 2015-05-25 - 10:10 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf toplhcwg_ttxsec_8TeV_may15.pdf r1 manage 6.7 K 2015-05-25 - 10:10 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng toplhcwg_ttxsec_8TeV_may15.png r1 manage 38.7 K 2015-05-25 - 10:10 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf toplhcwg_ttxsec_8TeV_mtopwa.pdf r1 manage 6.1 K 2015-05-14 - 18:47 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng toplhcwg_ttxsec_8TeV_mtopwa.png r1 manage 153.0 K 2015-05-14 - 18:47 MartijnMulders  
Unknown file formateps toplhcwg_ttxsec_8TeV_mtopwa_may15.eps r1 manage 20.1 K 2015-05-25 - 10:10 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf toplhcwg_ttxsec_8TeV_mtopwa_may15.pdf r1 manage 6.6 K 2015-05-25 - 10:10 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng toplhcwg_ttxsec_8TeV_mtopwa_may15.png r1 manage 35.9 K 2015-05-25 - 10:10 MartijnMulders  
Unknown file formateps topmass_world.eps r1 manage 31.5 K 2015-10-19 - 18:02 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf topmass_world.pdf r1 manage 7.7 K 2015-10-19 - 18:02 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng topmass_world.png r1 manage 210.7 K 2015-10-19 - 18:02 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf ttX_summary_sep20.pdf r1 manage 15.8 K 2020-09-15 - 10:58 MariaAldaya  
PNGpng ttX_summary_sep20.png r1 manage 69.1 K 2020-09-15 - 10:58 MariaAldaya  
PDFpdf tt_curve_toplhcwg_Nov17.pdf r1 manage 21.3 K 2017-11-15 - 13:37 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_curve_toplhcwg_Nov17.png r1 manage 614.3 K 2017-11-15 - 13:37 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_curve_toplhcwg_sep17.png r1 manage 432.0 K 2017-09-22 - 15:31 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_curve_toplhcwg_sept17.pdf r1 manage 21.2 K 2017-09-22 - 15:31 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_13TeV_may2017.pdf r1 manage 16.2 K 2017-05-19 - 15:54 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_13TeV_may2017.png r1 manage 61.7 K 2017-05-19 - 15:54 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_13TeV_sep18.png r1 manage 64.5 K 2018-10-01 - 11:08 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_7TeV_may2017.pdf r1 manage 19.7 K 2017-05-19 - 15:54 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_7TeV_may2017.png r1 manage 71.1 K 2017-05-19 - 15:54 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_8TeV_may2017.pdf r1 manage 16.8 K 2017-05-19 - 15:54 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_8TeV_may2017.png r1 manage 67.2 K 2017-05-19 - 15:54 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_mttbar.pdf r1 manage 21.3 K 2015-12-04 - 19:01 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_mttbar.png r1 manage 34.0 K 2015-12-04 - 19:01 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_mttbar_MC.pdf r1 manage 21.2 K 2015-12-04 - 19:11 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_mttbar_MC.png r1 manage 34.2 K 2015-12-04 - 19:11 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_mttbar_MC_nov2016.pdf r1 manage 21.2 K 2017-01-23 - 17:04 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_mttbar_MC_nov2016.png r1 manage 34.4 K 2017-01-23 - 17:04 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_mttbar_NLOvsNNLO_nov2016.pdf r1 manage 21.3 K 2017-01-23 - 17:04 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_mttbar_NLOvsNNLO_nov2016.png r1 manage 35.2 K 2017-01-23 - 17:04 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_mttbar_nov2016.pdf r1 manage 21.4 K 2017-01-23 - 16:53 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_mttbar_nov2016.png r1 manage 35.5 K 2017-01-23 - 16:53 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_mttbar_onlyNNLO.pdf r1 manage 21.1 K 2015-12-04 - 19:21 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_mttbar_onlyNNLO.png r1 manage 31.2 K 2015-12-04 - 19:21 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_mttbar_onlyNNLO_nov2016.pdf r1 manage 21.0 K 2017-01-23 - 17:04 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_mttbar_onlyNNLO_nov2016.png r1 manage 32.3 K 2017-01-23 - 17:04 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_toppt.pdf r1 manage 22.0 K 2015-12-04 - 19:58 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_toppt.png r1 manage 49.2 K 2015-12-04 - 19:58 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_toppt_MC.pdf r1 manage 21.9 K 2015-12-04 - 19:58 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_toppt_MC.png r1 manage 45.2 K 2015-12-04 - 19:58 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_toppt_MC_nov2016.pdf r1 manage 21.9 K 2017-01-23 - 17:04 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_toppt_MC_nov2016.png r1 manage 45.4 K 2017-01-23 - 17:04 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_toppt_NLOvsNNLO_nov2016.pdf r1 manage 22.0 K 2017-01-23 - 17:05 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_toppt_NLOvsNNLO_nov2016.png r1 manage 37.0 K 2017-01-23 - 17:05 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_toppt_nov2016.pdf r1 manage 22.4 K 2017-01-23 - 17:04 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_toppt_nov2016.png r1 manage 50.7 K 2017-01-23 - 17:04 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_toppt_onlyNNLO.pdf r1 manage 21.5 K 2015-12-04 - 19:58 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_toppt_onlyNNLO.png r1 manage 33.9 K 2015-12-04 - 19:58 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_toppt_onlyNNLO_nov2016.pdf r1 manage 21.7 K 2017-01-23 - 17:05 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_toppt_onlyNNLO_nov2016.png r1 manage 34.0 K 2017-01-23 - 17:05 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_ttbarpt_MC.pdf r1 manage 21.4 K 2015-12-04 - 19:58 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_ttbarpt_MC.png r1 manage 35.3 K 2015-12-04 - 19:58 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_ttbarpt_MC_nov2016.pdf r1 manage 21.4 K 2017-01-23 - 17:05 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_diff_8TeV_ttbarpt_MC_nov2016.png r1 manage 35.6 K 2017-01-23 - 17:05 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_lhc13_Nov17.pdf r1 manage 16.3 K 2017-11-15 - 13:37 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_lhc13_Nov17.png r1 manage 381.7 K 2017-11-15 - 13:37 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_lhc13_may18.pdf r1 manage 16.3 K 2018-05-27 - 21:30 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_lhc13_may18.png r1 manage 62.4 K 2018-05-27 - 21:30 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_lhc13_sept17.pdf r1 manage 16.3 K 2017-09-22 - 15:31 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_lhc13_sept17.png r1 manage 276.2 K 2017-09-22 - 15:31 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_lhc7_Nov17.pdf r1 manage 19.8 K 2017-11-15 - 13:37 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_lhc7_Nov17.png r1 manage 447.5 K 2017-11-15 - 13:37 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_lhc8TeV_may18.pdf r1 manage 17.0 K 2018-05-27 - 21:34 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_lhc8TeV_may18.png r1 manage 71.5 K 2018-05-27 - 21:34 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_lhc8_Nov17.pdf r1 manage 17.0 K 2017-11-15 - 13:37 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_lhc8_Nov17.png r1 manage 460.6 K 2017-11-15 - 13:37 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_lhc8_may18.pdf r1 manage 17.0 K 2018-05-27 - 21:36 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_lhc8_may18.png r1 manage 71.5 K 2018-05-27 - 21:36 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_lhc8_sept17.pdf r1 manage 17.0 K 2017-09-22 - 15:23 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_lhc8_sept17.png r1 manage 329.9 K 2017-09-22 - 15:23 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf tt_xsec_vsroots_may2017.pdf r1 manage 21.2 K 2017-05-19 - 15:54 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng tt_xsec_vsroots_may2017.png r1 manage 39.4 K 2017-05-19 - 15:54 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf ttbar_crossection_7TeV.pdf r1 manage 5.3 K 2015-11-05 - 14:24 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng ttbar_crossection_7TeV.png r1 manage 76.8 K 2015-11-05 - 14:24 MartijnMulders  
PDFpdf ttbar_crossection_8TeV_m1725_Sep14.pdf r1 manage 5.7 K 2015-11-05 - 17:55 MartijnMulders  
PNGpng ttbar_crossection_8TeV_m1725_Sep14.png r1 manage 153.8 K 2015-11-05 - 17:55 MartijnMulders  
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r85 < r84 < r83 < r82 < r81 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r85 - 2022-11-30 - MariaAldaya
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    LHCPhysics All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright &© 2008-2023 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback