TWiki> LHCb Web>LHCbPPTS>PIDConferencePlots (revision 14)EditAttachPDF

PID Plots for Conference

Run 2

Deuteron ID

Plot Description

MC15TuneV1_ProbNNd_0.0_to_1000000.0_LcpKpi.png

ProbNNd shapes for charged tracks from MC.

Deuterons are taken from a 2016 $\Lambda_{b} \rightarrow dp$ sample, and other tracks are from a 2016 $\Lambda_{c} \rightarrow pK\pi$ sample, for all momenta. Decay products in the $\Lambda_{c}$ sample are removed, such that the sample is a close representation of a MinBias sample.

Yields of each track type is normalised to unity.

MC15TuneV1_ProbNNd_0.0_to_1000000.0_LcpKpi_vs_P.png

Profile histogram of ProbNNd in bins of momentum for MC tracks in range 0 < p < 100 GeV.c. MC samples are the same as above. Features in the shapes can be attributed to the RICH thresholds, where separation between the particles changes.

9.3 GeV/c is RICH 1 kaon threshold

15.3 GeV/c is RICH 2 kaon threshold

17.7 GeV/c is RICH 1 proton threshold

29.7 GeV/c is RICH 2 proton threshold

35.4 GeV/c is RICH 1 deuteron threshold

59.3 GeV/c is RICH 2 deuteron threshold

FitToProbNNd_toy_25_29700_35400.png

A template fit to a toy histogram in ProbNNd, with shapes for each component taken from MC (deuterons from 2016 $\Lambda_{b} \rightarrow dp$ sample, all others from 2016 $\Lambda_{c} \rightarrow pK\pi$), and the toy a combination of the MC shapes.

This is for the momentum region 29.7 < p < 35.4 GeV/c, with the relative yields of each of the track types taken from generator-level MC of prompt deuteron production.

Integrated number of entries in the plot approximately matches the number of tracks in the NoBias 2017 data sample for this momentum bin.

Note the variable width bins on the x-axis, which are plotted evenly; the binning was chosen such that the deuteron shape would be flat, so the plot is concentrated in the very high ProbNNd region.

approved_LHCb_Ratios_BothModels_fromHistograms.png

The expected deuteron yield as a ratio of pion yield, in bins of momentum, using two deuteron production models: coalesence and cross-section.

The $p$ and ${K}$ yields are also shown as ratios of $\pi$ yield.

These yields were taken from generator-level MC. Gauss is used to generate the $pp$–collisions, with a function appended to it to form deuterons from $p$ and $n$ pairs in each event.

Approved on 18/09/2018: https://indico.cern.ch/event/757547/contributions/3144861/attachments/1717660/2771699/Plot_approval.pdf
approved_DLLd_PionDeut.png

Plot to demonstrate the separation offered by DLL variables.

Normalised pion and deuteron distributions in DLL$(d - \pi)$ from $\Lambda_{b}^{0} \rightarrow d \bar{p}$ MC sample, with requirement that tracks satisfy hasRICH.

Approved on 18/09/2018: https://indico.cern.ch/event/757547/contributions/3144861/attachments/1717660/2771699/Plot_approval.pdf
approved_AllParticles_Efficiency_DLLd_5_HasRICH.png

In bins of momentum, deuteron-selection efficiencies for deuterons, and mis-ID efficiencies for $p, K $ and $\pi$.

For deuterons, the efficiencies are taken from a MC sample ($\Lambda_{b}^{0} \rightarrow d \bar{p}$),and for $p, K $ and $\pi$ they are taken from PIDCalib. DLL$(d - \pi)$ > 5 && DLL$(d - K)$ > 5 && DLL$(d - p)$ > 5 && hasRICH

Approved on 18/09/2018: https://indico.cern.ch/event/757547/contributions/3144861/attachments/1717660/2771699/Plot_approval.pdf
approved_AllParticles_Efficiency_DLLd_30_HasRICH.png

In bins of momentum, deuteron-selection efficiencies for deuterons, and mis-ID efficiencies for $p, K $ and $\pi$.

For deuterons, the efficiencies are taken from a MC sample ($\Lambda_{b}^{0} \rightarrow d \bar{p}$),and for $p, K $ and $\pi$ they are taken from PIDCalib. DLL$(d - \pi)$ > 30 && DLL$(d - K)$ > 30 && DLL$(d - p)$ > 30 && hasRICH

Approved on 18/09/2018: https://indico.cern.ch/event/757547/contributions/3144861/attachments/1717660/2771699/Plot_approval.pdf

2017

RICH

Plot Description
Plot_2017Validation_KPi_P.png Kaon identification efficiency and pion misidentification rate as measured using 2017 MagDown data as a function of track momentum. Two different \DeltaLLKPi requirements have been imposed on the samples, resulting in the open and filled marker distributions, respectively.
Plot_2017Validation_PPi_P.png Proton identification efficiency and pion misidentification rate as measured using 2017 MagDown data as a function of track momentum. Two different \DeltaLLPPi requirements have been imposed on the samples, resulting in the open and filled marker distributions, respectively.
Plot_2017Validation_PK_P.png Proton identification efficiency and kaon misidentification rate as measured using 2017 MagDown data as a function of track momentum. Two different \DeltaLLPK requirements have been imposed on the samples, resulting in the open and filled marker distributions, respectively.

MUON

Plot Description
Plot_2017Validation_MuPi_P.png Muon identification efficiency and pion misidentification rate as measured using 2017 MagDown data as a function of track momentum. Two different identification requirements have been imposed on the samples, resulting in the open (isMuon) and filled marker distributions (\DeltaLLMuPi), respectively.
Plot_2017Validation_MuK_P.png Muon identification efficiency and kaon misidentification rate as measured using 2017 MagDown data as a function of track momentum. Two different identification requirements have been imposed on the samples, resulting in the open (isMuon) and filled marker distributions (\DeltaLLMuK), respectively.
Plot_2017Validation_MuP_P.png Muon identification efficiency and proton misidentification rate as measured using 2017 MagDown data as a function of track momentum. Two different identification requirements have been imposed on the samples, resulting in the open (isMuon) and filled marker distributions (\DeltaLLMuP), respectively.

2016

RICH

Plot Description
MagDown_2016.png Kaon identification efficiency and pion misidentification rate as measured using 2016 MagDown data as a function of track momentum. Two different \DeltaLLKPi requirements have been imposed on the samples, resulting in the open and filled marker distributions, respectively.
MagUp_2016.png Kaon identification efficiency and pion misidentification rate as measured using 2016 MagUp data as a function of track momentum. Two different \DeltaLLKPi requirements have been imposed on the samples, resulting in the open and filled marker distributions, respectively.
Merged_2016.png Kaon identification efficiency and pion misidentification rate as measured using 2016 data (MagDown + MagUp) as a function of track momentum. Two different \DeltaLLKPi requirements have been imposed on the samples, resulting in the open and filled marker distributions, respectively.
ROC_2016.png Kaon identification efficiency and pion misidentification rate as measured using 2016 data with different \DeltaLLKPi requirements.

MUON

Plot Description
Plot_2016_MuPi_P.png Muon identification efficiency and pion misidentification rate as measured using 2017 MagDown data as a function of track momentum. Two different identification requirements have been imposed on the samples, resulting in the open (isMuon) and filled marker distributions (\DeltaLLMuPi), respectively.
Plot_2016_MuK_P.png Muon identification efficiency and kaon misidentification rate as measured using 2017 MagDown data as a function of track momentum. Two different identification requirements have been imposed on the samples, resulting in the open (isMuon) and filled marker distributions (\DeltaLLMuK), respectively.
Plot_2016_MuP_P.png Muon identification efficiency and proton misidentification rate as measured using 2017 MagDown data as a function of track momentum. Two different identification requirements have been imposed on the samples, resulting in the open (isMuon) and filled marker distributions (\DeltaLLMuP), respectively.

2015

RICH

Plot Description
S23_KPi_P.png Kaon identification efficiency and pion misidentification rate as measured using 2015 data as a function of track momentum. Two different \DeltaLLKPi requirements have been imposed on the samples, resulting in the open and filled marker distributions, respectively.
S23_PK_P.png Proton identification efficiency and kaon misidentification rate as measured using 2015 data as a function of track momentum. Two different \DeltaLLPK requirements have been imposed on the samples, resulting in the open and filled marker distributions, respectively.
S23_PPi_P.png Proton identification efficiency and pion misidentification rate as measured using 2015 data as a function of track momentum. Two different \DeltaLLPPi requirements have been imposed on the samples, resulting in the open and filled marker distributions, respectively.

MUON

S23_MuMu_MagDown.png Efficiency of the isMuon selection based on the matching of hits in the muon system to track extrapolation as a function of momentum (black) and efficiency of the isMuon selection plus \DeltaLL(\mu-h) >0, where h can be a pion (red), a kaon (blue) and a proton (green).
S23_PiMu_MagDown.png Misidentification probability of pions as a function of momentum after isMuon (black) and isMuon+\DeltaLL(\mu - \pi) >0 (red).
S23_KMu_MagDown.png Misidentification probability of kaons as a function of momentum after isMuon (black) and isMuon+\DeltaLL(\mu - K) >0 (blue).
S23_PMu_MagDown.png Misidentification probability of protons as a function of momentum after isMuon (black) and isMuon+\DeltaLL(\mu - P) >0 (green).

CALO

ePIDVsPiMisID2015.png Electron identification efficiency and pion misidentification rate as measured using 2015 data as a function of track momentum. Two different \DeltaLLePi requirements have been imposed on the samples, resulting in the open and filled marker distributions, respectively. The plot is made only for electron track for which no bremsstrahlung photons have been recovered.

Run 1

2012

RICH

Plot Description
S20_KPi_P.png Kaon identification efficiency and pion misidentification rate as measured using 2012 data as a function of track momentum. Two different \DeltaLLKPi requirements have been imposed on the samples, resulting in the open and filled marker distributions, respectively.
S20_PK_P.png Proton identification efficiency and kaon misidentification rate as measured using 2012 data as a function of track momentum. Two different \DeltaLLPK requirements have been imposed on the samples, resulting in the open and filled marker distributions, respectively.
S20_PPi_P.png Proton identification efficiency and pion misidentification rate as measured using 2012 data as a function of track momentum. Two different \DeltaLLPPi requirements have been imposed on the samples, resulting in the open and filled marker distributions, respectively.

2011

RICH

See the link to the RICH page. In addition the following plots are taken from LHCb Detector performance

Plot Description
Fig38.png Reconstructed Cherenkov angle for \emph{isolated} tracks, as a function of track momentum in the \cfourften radiator. The Cherenkov bands for muons, pions, kaons and protons are clearly visible.
Fig39left.png Kaon identification efficiency and pion misidentification rate as measured using data as a function of track momentum. Two different \DeltaLLKPi requirements have been imposed on the samples, resulting in the open and filled marker distributions, respectively.
Fig39right.png Kaon identification efficiency and pion misidentification rate from simulation as a function of track momentum. Two different \DeltaLLKPi requirements have been imposed on the samples, resulting in the open and filled marker distributions, respectively.
Fig40left.png Pion misidentification fraction versus kaon identification efficiency as measured in 7\,TeV LHCb collisions as a function of track multiplicity. The efficiencies are averaged over all particle momenta.
Fig40right.png Pion misidentification fraction versus kaon identification efficiency as measured in 7\,TeV LHCb collisions as a function of the number of reconstructed primary vertices. The efficiencies are averaged over all particle momenta.

CALO

The following plots are taken from the LHCb Detector performance

Plot Description

Fig44.png Comparison of the Monte Carlo performance of the gamma/pi0 separation tool developed by Yandex (full lines) and the default one (dashed line). The curves display the photon selection efficiency versus the pi0 selection efficiency as determined on a photon sample (B -> K*gamma) and on two pi0 samples (B -> Kpipi0 in blue and B -> J/psi K*[Kpi0] in green). The red dots indicate 95% photon efficency and the corresponding efficiency for pi0. The figure is taken from the proceedings of the ACAT 2017 conference.
Fig32.png Performance of the photon identification. Purity as a function of efficiency for (green) the full photon candidate sample, (blue) converted candidates according to the SPD information and (red) non-converted candidates (left). Photon identification efficiency as a function of \piz rejection efficiency for the $\gamma-\piz$ separation tool for simulation, the red curve, and data, the blue curve (right).
Fig35.png Electron identification efficiency versus misidentification rate.
Fig36.png Electron identification performances for various $\Delta$ log ${\mathcal L}^\text{CALO}(e-h)$ cuts: electron efficiency (left) and misidentification rate (right) as functions of the track momentum.

MUON

See the link to the MUON page

Fig41topleft.png Efficiency of the muon candidate selection based on the matching of hits in the muon system to track extrapolation as a function of momentum for different \pt ranges.
Fig41topright.png Misidentification probability of protons as a function of momentum for different \pt ranges.
Fig41bottomleft.png Misidentification probability of pions as a function of momentum for different \pt ranges.
Fig41bottomright.png Misidentification probability of kaons as a function of momentum for different \pt ranges.

Global

The following plots are taken from the LHCb Detector performance

PlotSorted ascending Description
Fig42left.png Electron identification performance using the $\deltaLLCombepi$ variable, as measured in 8\,TeV collision data, using a tag and probe technique with electrons from the decay $B^{\pm} \to (J/\psi \to e^+e^-) K^{\pm}$. Pion misidentication rate versus electron identification probability when the cut value is varied.
Fig42right.png Electron identification performance using the $\deltaLLCombepi$ variable, as measured in 8\,TeV collision data, using a tag and probe technique with electrons from the decay $B^{\pm} \to (J/\psi \to e^+e^-) K^{\pm}$. Electron identification efficiency and pion misidentification rate as a function of track momentum, for two different cuts on $\deltaLLCombepi$.
Fig43left.png Background misidentification rates versus muon identification efficiency, as measured in the $\Sigma^+\to p\mu^+\mu^-$ decay study. The variables $\deltaLLXpi$ (black) and ProbNN (red), the probability value for each particle hypothesis, are compared for $5-10$\gevc muons and $5-50$\gevc protons, using data sidebands for backgrounds and Monte Carlo simulation for the signal.
Fig43right.png Background misidentification rates versus proton identification efficiency, as measured in the $\Sigma^+\to p\mu^+\mu^-$ decay study. The variables $\deltaLLXpi$ (black) and ProbNN (red), the probability value for each particle hypothesis, are compared for $5-10$\gevc muons and $5-50$\gevc protons, using data sidebands for backgrounds and Monte Carlo simulation for the signal.
-- MariannaFontana - 2016-04-07
Attachments Attachments
Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
PDFpdf Fig32.pdf r1 manage 36.5 K 2016-04-11 - 11:22 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Fig32.png r1 manage 96.7 K 2016-04-11 - 12:10 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Fig35.pdf r1 manage 38.3 K 2016-04-11 - 15:04 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Fig35.png r1 manage 91.1 K 2016-04-11 - 15:04 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Fig36.pdf r1 manage 98.9 K 2016-04-11 - 15:04 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Fig36.png r1 manage 159.8 K 2016-04-11 - 15:04 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Fig38.pdf r1 manage 74.9 K 2016-04-11 - 15:04 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Fig38.png r1 manage 1067.9 K 2016-04-11 - 15:04 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Fig39left.pdf r1 manage 54.2 K 2016-04-11 - 15:45 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Fig39left.png r1 manage 118.7 K 2016-04-11 - 15:45 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Fig39right.pdf r1 manage 55.2 K 2016-04-11 - 15:45 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Fig39right.png r1 manage 123.2 K 2016-04-11 - 15:45 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Fig40left.pdf r1 manage 18.5 K 2016-04-11 - 15:04 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Fig40left.png r1 manage 117.7 K 2016-04-11 - 15:04 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Fig40right.pdf r1 manage 18.5 K 2016-04-11 - 15:04 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Fig40right.png r1 manage 115.3 K 2016-04-11 - 15:04 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Fig41bottomleft.pdf r1 manage 53.0 K 2016-04-11 - 16:25 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Fig41bottomleft.png r1 manage 153.4 K 2016-04-11 - 16:25 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Fig41bottomright.pdf r1 manage 55.0 K 2016-04-11 - 16:25 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Fig41bottomright.png r1 manage 155.7 K 2016-04-11 - 16:25 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Fig41topleft.pdf r1 manage 60.5 K 2016-04-11 - 16:25 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Fig41topleft.png r1 manage 139.4 K 2016-04-11 - 16:25 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Fig41topright.pdf r1 manage 87.6 K 2016-04-11 - 16:25 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Fig41topright.png r1 manage 145.7 K 2016-04-11 - 16:25 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Fig42left.pdf r1 manage 15.9 K 2016-04-11 - 15:05 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Fig42left.png r1 manage 65.8 K 2016-04-11 - 15:05 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Fig42right.pdf r1 manage 18.3 K 2016-04-11 - 15:05 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Fig42right.png r1 manage 113.5 K 2016-04-11 - 15:05 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Fig43left.pdf r1 manage 22.3 K 2016-04-11 - 15:05 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Fig43left.png r1 manage 107.8 K 2016-04-11 - 15:05 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Fig43right.pdf r1 manage 22.1 K 2016-04-11 - 15:05 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Fig43right.png r1 manage 106.5 K 2016-04-11 - 15:05 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Fig44.png r1 manage 57.8 K 2017-11-09 - 10:23 MaxChefdeville  
PDFpdf FitToProbNNd_toy_25_29700_35400.pdf r3 r2 r1 manage 20.9 K 2019-03-28 - 15:24 SophieKatherineBaker  
PNGpng FitToProbNNd_toy_25_29700_35400.png r3 r2 r1 manage 21.2 K 2019-03-28 - 15:24 SophieKatherineBaker  
PDFpdf MC15TuneV1_ProbNNd_0.0_to_1000000.0_LcpKpi.pdf r1 manage 29.1 K 2019-03-18 - 14:31 SophieKatherineBaker  
PNGpng MC15TuneV1_ProbNNd_0.0_to_1000000.0_LcpKpi.png r1 manage 18.7 K 2019-03-18 - 14:31 SophieKatherineBaker  
PDFpdf MC15TuneV1_ProbNNd_0.0_to_1000000.0_LcpKpi_vs_P.pdf r2 r1 manage 29.0 K 2019-03-20 - 20:54 SophieKatherineBaker  
PNGpng MC15TuneV1_ProbNNd_0.0_to_1000000.0_LcpKpi_vs_P.png r2 r1 manage 20.5 K 2019-03-20 - 20:54 SophieKatherineBaker  
PDFpdf MagDown.pdf r1 manage 17.0 K 2016-10-03 - 17:13 WenbinQian  
PDFpdf MagDown_2016.pdf r1 manage 17.0 K 2016-10-03 - 21:06 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng MagDown_2016.png r1 manage 97.4 K 2016-10-03 - 21:06 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf MagUp.pdf r1 manage 17.0 K 2016-10-03 - 17:13 WenbinQian  
PDFpdf MagUp_2016.pdf r1 manage 17.0 K 2016-10-03 - 21:06 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng MagUp_2016.png r1 manage 97.0 K 2016-10-03 - 21:06 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Merged.pdf r1 manage 17.0 K 2016-10-03 - 17:13 WenbinQian  
PDFpdf Merged_2016.pdf r1 manage 17.0 K 2016-10-03 - 21:07 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Merged_2016.png r1 manage 97.3 K 2016-10-03 - 21:07 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Plot_2016_MuK_P.pdf r1 manage 17.0 K 2017-09-19 - 16:04 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Plot_2016_MuK_P.png r1 manage 98.2 K 2017-09-19 - 16:04 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Plot_2016_MuP_P.pdf r1 manage 16.9 K 2017-09-19 - 16:04 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Plot_2016_MuP_P.png r1 manage 96.5 K 2017-09-19 - 16:04 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Plot_2016_MuPi_P.pdf r1 manage 31.3 K 2017-09-19 - 16:04 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Plot_2016_MuPi_P.png r1 manage 94.1 K 2017-09-19 - 16:04 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Plot_2017Validation_KPi_P.pdf r1 manage 17.2 K 2017-09-19 - 15:42 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Plot_2017Validation_KPi_P.png r1 manage 104.5 K 2017-09-19 - 15:42 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Plot_2017Validation_MuK_P.pdf r1 manage 17.7 K 2017-09-19 - 15:42 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Plot_2017Validation_MuK_P.png r1 manage 100.7 K 2017-09-19 - 15:42 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Plot_2017Validation_MuP_P.pdf r1 manage 17.3 K 2017-09-19 - 15:42 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Plot_2017Validation_MuP_P.png r1 manage 98.1 K 2017-09-19 - 15:42 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Plot_2017Validation_MuPi_P.pdf r1 manage 17.7 K 2017-09-19 - 15:42 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Plot_2017Validation_MuPi_P.png r1 manage 97.3 K 2017-09-19 - 15:42 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Plot_2017Validation_PK_P.pdf r1 manage 16.8 K 2017-09-19 - 15:42 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Plot_2017Validation_PK_P.png r1 manage 101.2 K 2017-09-19 - 15:42 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf Plot_2017Validation_PPi_P.pdf r1 manage 17.1 K 2017-09-19 - 15:50 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng Plot_2017Validation_PPi_P.png r1 manage 100.3 K 2017-09-19 - 15:50 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf ROC.pdf r1 manage 14.2 K 2016-10-03 - 17:13 WenbinQian  
PDFpdf ROC_2016.pdf r1 manage 14.2 K 2016-10-03 - 21:07 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng ROC_2016.png r1 manage 85.4 K 2016-10-03 - 21:07 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf S20_KPi_P.pdf r1 manage 17.0 K 2016-09-28 - 15:22 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng S20_KPi_P.png r1 manage 94.0 K 2016-09-28 - 15:22 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf S20_PK_P.pdf r1 manage 16.9 K 2016-09-28 - 15:22 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng S20_PK_P.png r1 manage 93.1 K 2016-09-28 - 15:22 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf S20_PPi_P.pdf r1 manage 16.9 K 2016-09-28 - 15:22 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng S20_PPi_P.png r1 manage 92.6 K 2016-09-28 - 15:22 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf S23_KMu_MagDown.pdf r1 manage 14.8 K 2016-10-07 - 10:09 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng S23_KMu_MagDown.png r1 manage 94.2 K 2016-10-07 - 10:09 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf S23_KMu_MagUp.pdf r1 manage 14.7 K 2016-10-07 - 10:09 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf S23_KPi_P.pdf r1 manage 17.0 K 2016-09-28 - 14:48 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng S23_KPi_P.png r1 manage 93.3 K 2016-09-28 - 14:48 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf S23_MuMu_MagDown.pdf r1 manage 16.1 K 2016-10-07 - 10:08 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng S23_MuMu_MagDown.png r1 manage 120.1 K 2016-10-07 - 10:08 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf S23_PK_P.pdf r1 manage 16.8 K 2016-09-28 - 14:49 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng S23_PK_P.png r1 manage 90.8 K 2016-09-28 - 14:49 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf S23_PMu_MagDown.pdf r1 manage 14.7 K 2016-10-07 - 10:10 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng S23_PMu_MagDown.png r1 manage 93.4 K 2016-10-07 - 10:10 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf S23_PPi_P.pdf r1 manage 17.0 K 2016-09-28 - 14:49 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng S23_PPi_P.png r1 manage 90.1 K 2016-09-28 - 14:49 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf S23_PiMu_MagDown.pdf r1 manage 15.0 K 2016-10-07 - 10:08 MariannaFontana  
PNGpng S23_PiMu_MagDown.png r1 manage 97.5 K 2016-10-07 - 10:08 MariannaFontana  
PDFpdf approved_AllParticles_Efficiency_DLLd_30_HasRICH.pdf r1 manage 17.8 K 2018-09-18 - 16:45 JeanFrancoisMarchand  
PNGpng approved_AllParticles_Efficiency_DLLd_30_HasRICH.png r1 manage 13.1 K 2018-09-18 - 16:45 JeanFrancoisMarchand  
PDFpdf approved_AllParticles_Efficiency_DLLd_5_HasRICH.pdf r1 manage 17.9 K 2018-09-18 - 16:45 JeanFrancoisMarchand  
PNGpng approved_AllParticles_Efficiency_DLLd_5_HasRICH.png r1 manage 13.0 K 2018-09-18 - 16:45 JeanFrancoisMarchand  
PDFpdf approved_DLLd_PionDeut.pdf r1 manage 16.1 K 2018-09-18 - 16:45 JeanFrancoisMarchand  
PNGpng approved_DLLd_PionDeut.png r1 manage 17.6 K 2018-09-18 - 16:45 JeanFrancoisMarchand  
PDFpdf approved_LHCb_Ratios_BothModels_fromHistograms.pdf r1 manage 17.5 K 2018-09-18 - 16:45 JeanFrancoisMarchand  
PNGpng approved_LHCb_Ratios_BothModels_fromHistograms.png r1 manage 13.7 K 2018-09-18 - 16:45 JeanFrancoisMarchand  
PDFpdf ePIDVsPiMisID2015.pdf r1 manage 16.4 K 2017-05-08 - 15:01 ThibaudHumair  
PNGpng ePIDVsPiMisID2015.png r1 manage 16.6 K 2017-05-08 - 14:56 ThibaudHumair e ID and pi mis-ID rates vs momentum
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r20 | r16 < r15 < r14 < r13 | Backlinks | Raw View | Raw edit | More topic actions...
Topic revision: r14 - 2019-03-28 - SophieKatherineBaker
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    LHCb All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright &© 2008-2021 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback