Elba 2015 proceedings: poster on Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) sensors as flatness and mechanical stretching sensors

* Author: Saleh and Luigi

* Title of poster: Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) sensors as flatness and mechanical stretching sensors

* Link to poster in CINCO: https://cms-mgt-conferences.web.cern.ch/cms-mgt-conferences/conferences/pres_display.aspx?cid=1575&pid=11173


  • Deadline for proceedings: 24 June 2015
  • CMS CR number: CMS CR-2015/131
  • Link to CMS conference report on iCMS:
  • Link to final proceedings as published by conference:

Comments by Paul Karchin
At first paper draft

* Comment1: The sole result shown is Fig. 2 which mainly shows that the strain is constant after a characteristic settling time. I don't see how you can conclude from what is presented that "It can be seen from Fig. 2 that the reaction time of FBG sensors to changing tensile load is instantaneous." Answer Instantaneous reaction is referred to the time when load (stress) is applied or removed NOT when constant stress is applied.

* Comment2: The figure does not show the load. Answer Figure shows the variation of strain with respect to time by applying some stress, work is going on as said in the paper to determine the nominal load to get the flatness.

* Comment3: The time axis is strange from 1.5E4 to 2.1E4 sec. Answer We suppose 1.5E4 is our starting point, it is done as per comment.

* Comment3: The strain axis has odd units of "millistrain" - what is that? Answer It is Done as per comment

* Comment4: The axis labels are too small to be visible at normal magnification. Answer Axis are magnified (Done)

Comments by Kerstin Hoepfner
At first paper draft

* Comment1: We will take the time it takes to bring these proceedings to the necessary level. They will be published in NIM which is a high level instrumentation journal. Answer Paper is mproved

* Comment2: Following Paul's comments, I ask Saleh to read through the comments I sent to the list on Ilaria's and Alice's proceedings and make sure that those points which apply here are taking into account. Answer Paul comments are accommodated as mentioned above

* Comment2: I see a number of places.... I'm also asking Luigi to have a look and help Saleh. Answer Luigi input taken in account

* Comment3: Add the TDR as a ref. Answer GEM TDR is added in reference

* Comment4: Here, we have two plots which are not coming from the TDR. I think there is nothing controversial but would like to know if they have been shown in a GEM meeting somewhere. Answer As Luigi said in his email: Concerning the plots one is a schematic view of the FBG sensors used and the second is the gran total of the measurement published in the TDR. Actually the TDR picture is just the right part of the plot in this paper. For sure they are not controversial. I also underline that both have been shown in the detector meeting and discussed well in advance the conference. We will work on the paper in the next two days to improve the few sentences that can be written in one single page.

* Comment5: Just to avoid surprises. Answer It is tried to avoid

Comments at Second draft: a few comments on your proceedings at https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/MPGD/ElbaProceedings/elba2015-proceedings_June_24.pdf * Comment6: - don't start the intro with GE1/1. First introduce the project (CMS, GE1/1) and explain what Ge1/1 is (if needed). Move the last paragraph to be beginning and add a bit of information. Answer It is done as per comments and suggestions

* Comment7: - please ask someone with experience in scientific writing to help you to rewrite a bit Sec.3. It is hard to understand. The paper should be understood by standard readers. Answer Consulted with experience person (e.g. Luigi Benussi, Stefano Bianco, Michele and our frascati group) and treid to explain better.

* Comment8: - Can't you plot Figs.4-6 in the same histogram using different colors and/or linestyles. Answer It is Done as suggested

* Comment9: In any case, say that this a good result (presumably). What are the units? Answer Units have been mentioned as per comments

* Comment10: - Decide for Figure or Fig. Answer Decided it is "Figure".

You still need to send your proceedings to iCMS, correct? Please do with with the improved version asap. See instructions on the twiki.

* elba2015-proceeding-Saleh.pdf: proceedings_draft

* elba2015-proceedings_June_24.pdf: proceedings_draft

* Elba-2015-July2.pdf: proceedings_draft

* elba2015-July06.pdf: proceedings_draft

Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
PDFpdf Elba-2015-July2.pdf r1 manage 30069.1 K 2015-07-02 - 13:04 SalehMuhammad  
PDFpdf elba2015-July06.pdf r1 manage 30070.0 K 2015-07-06 - 17:00 SalehMuhammad  
PDFpdf elba2015-July13.pdf r1 manage 30070.0 K 2015-07-13 - 23:49 SalehMuhammad  
PDFpdf elba2015-proceeding-Saleh.pdf r1 manage 364.2 K 2015-06-23 - 16:34 SalehMuhammad 13th Pisa meeting proceedings paper
PDFpdf elba2015-proceedings_June_24.pdf r1 manage 2232.7 K 2015-06-24 - 09:16 SalehMuhammad  
PDFpdf elba2015_final.pdf r3 r2 r1 manage 30063.1 K 2015-07-15 - 17:08 LuigiBenussi  
PDFpdf elba2015_v3.pdf r1 manage 30063.3 K 2015-07-12 - 14:40 LuigiBenussi New version with Paul corrections.
PDFpdf elba2015_v4.pdf r1 manage 30063.5 K 2015-07-13 - 10:11 LuigiBenussi Two small typos fixed.
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r13 < r12 < r11 < r10 < r9 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r13 - 2015-07-15 - LuigiBenussi
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    MPGD All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2023 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback