MPGD Web>MPGDGEMsforCMSPhysics>PhysicsResultsGEMupgrade (2015-05-27, KerstinHoepfner)

Key plots from physics upgrade studies to support the GEM upgrade

A possible upgrade of the CMS muon forward system involves gas electron multiplier chambers (GEM) suggested for installation at LS2 covering the pseudorapidity range of 1.6<eta<2.4. Several benchmark analyses have been studied for the impact of such detector upgrade on the physics performance. Those benchmark channels include the golden decay channel of a SM higgs boson H->ZZ->4mu, the decay of a SM Higgs to 2 muons H->2mu in the VBF channel and the H(mumu)Z(ee) channel. Also the associated production of a Higgs boson with a SM W-boson, WH, was studied in different decay channels with muons in the final state. For physice beyond the SM a new state predicted by compositeness models has been studied, the production of an excited muon mu* together with a SM mu and their subsequent decays to 4 muons of high transverse momentum.

Physics plots for approval

Figure	Abbreviated Caption

	H to 2 taus with one tau decaying to muon and neutrinos. Such muons have an average pT around 15 GeV. In the case of only one tau decaying leptonically lowering the single muon trigger threshold increases the number of triggered events per fb. JPG

H to 2 taus with one tau decaying to muon and neutrinos. Such muons have an average pT around 15 GeV. In the case of only one tau decaying leptonically lowering the single muon trigger threshold increases the number of triggered events per fb. JPG

	H to 2 taus with one tau decaying to muon and neutrinos. Such muons have an average pT around 15 GeV. Opening the acceptance to larger values is fairly independent on the muon pT. For example increasing the upper eta value from 2.1 to 2.4 increases the number of events by ~6%. JPG

H to 2 taus with one tau decaying to muon and neutrinos. Such muons have an average pT around 15 GeV. Opening the acceptance to larger values is fairly independent on the muon pT. For example increasing the upper eta value from 2.1 to 2.4 increases the number of events by ~6%. JPG

	H to 2 taus with one tau decaying to muon and neutrinos. Gain by introducing a GEM station which allows to lower trigger threshold. JPG

H to 2 taus with one tau decaying to muon and neutrinos. Gain by introducing a GEM station which allows to lower trigger threshold. JPG

	Expected limit in Higgs to 2 muon analysis. The result is based on a signal simulation at sqrt(s)=14 TeV with the CMSSW_6 detector configuration and PU = 50. The plots below are indeed without PU but the performance is very similar. PNG

Expected limit in Higgs to 2 muon analysis. The result is based on a signal simulation at sqrt(s)=14 TeV with the CMSSW_6 detector configuration and PU = 50. The plots below are indeed without PU but the performance is very similar. PNG

	Sensitivity (expected significance as a function of luminosity) of the Higgs to 2 muon analysis. The result is based on a signal simulation at sqrt(s)=14 TeV with the CMSSW_6 detector configuration and PU = 50. The plots below are indeed without PU but performance is very similar. PNG

Sensitivity (expected significance as a function of luminosity) of the Higgs to 2 muon analysis. The result is based on a signal simulation at sqrt(s)=14 TeV with the CMSSW_6 detector configuration and PU = 50. The plots below are indeed without PU but performance is very similar. PNG

	Higgs to 2 muon analysis in the VBF channel. The efficiency times acceptance (e x A) is a function of the trigger acceptance eta. Instrumenting further in the forward region increases the signal efficiency by 10% when going from eta=2.1 to eta=2.4 and reaches nearly 100% when going to eta=4. The result is based on a signal simulation at sqrt(s)=14 TeV with the CMSSW_6 detector configuration and no PU. GIF

Higgs to 2 muon analysis in the VBF channel. The efficiency times acceptance (e x A) is a function of the trigger acceptance eta. Instrumenting further in the forward region increases the signal efficiency by 10% when going from eta=2.1 to eta=2.4 and reaches nearly 100% when going to eta=4. The result is based on a signal simulation at sqrt(s)=14 TeV with the CMSSW_6 detector configuration and no PU. GIF

	Higgs to 2 muon analysis in the VBF channel. The efficiency times acceptance (e x A) is a function of the trigger pT threshold. Lowering the trigger threshold increases the signal efficiency. The result is based on a signal simulation at sqrt(s)=14 TeV with the CMSSW_6 detector configuration and no PU. GIF

Higgs to 2 muon analysis in the VBF channel. The efficiency times acceptance (e x A) is a function of the trigger pT threshold. Lowering the trigger threshold increases the signal efficiency. The result is based on a signal simulation at sqrt(s)=14 TeV with the CMSSW_6 detector configuration and no PU. GIF

	Higgs to 2 muon in the VBF channel. Efficiency with and w/o the addition of GEM disks as a function of local inefficiency or missing CSCs. The result is based on a signal simulation at sqrt(s)=14 TeV with the CMSSW_6 detector configuration and PU = 50. PNG

Higgs to 2 muon in the VBF channel. Efficiency with and w/o the addition of GEM disks as a function of local inefficiency or missing CSCs. The result is based on a signal simulation at sqrt(s)=14 TeV with the CMSSW_6 detector configuration and PU = 50. PNG

	Higgs to 4 muons. Efficiency with and w/o the addition of GEM disks as a function of local inefficiency or missing CSCs. The result is based on a signal simulation at sqrt(s)=14 TeV with the CMSSW_6 detector configuration and PU = 50. PNG

Higgs to 4 muons. Efficiency with and w/o the addition of GEM disks as a function of local inefficiency or missing CSCs. The result is based on a signal simulation at sqrt(s)=14 TeV with the CMSSW_6 detector configuration and PU = 50. PNG

	Higgs to 4 muons. Efficiency gain with the addition of GEM disks as a function of local inefficiency or missing CSCs. The result is based on a signal simulation at sqrt(s)=14 TeV with the CMSSW_6 detector configuration and PU = 50. PNG

Higgs to 4 muons. Efficiency gain with the addition of GEM disks as a function of local inefficiency or missing CSCs. The result is based on a signal simulation at sqrt(s)=14 TeV with the CMSSW_6 detector configuration and PU = 50. PNG

	Expected significance (S/sqrt(S+B)) as a function of luminosity for the WH channel where W decay to muon and Higgs in a tau-jet pair. The curve is obtained as an estrapolation at sqrt(s)=14 TeV of the 2012 result at sqrt(s)=8 TeV and the integrated luminisity 19.5 fb^(-1). The result is based on Monte Carlo simulations at sqrt(s)=8 TeV for the signal and the unreducible backgrounds and on the data-driven estimation for the reducible backgrounds. PNG

Expected significance (S/sqrt(S+B)) as a function of luminosity for the WH channel where W decay to muon and Higgs in a tau-jet pair. The curve is obtained as an estrapolation at sqrt(s)=14 TeV of the 2012 result at sqrt(s)=8 TeV and the integrated luminisity 19.5 fb^(-1). The result is based on Monte Carlo simulations at sqrt(s)=8 TeV for the signal and the unreducible backgrounds and on the data-driven estimation for the reducible backgrounds.

PNG

$fraction_3p5_2p4_mtt_14TeV.png$	WH analysis where W decay to muon and Higgs in tau-jet pair. The plot shows the muon fractions in the eta regions of interest 1.6-2.4 (empty circle) and 1.6-3.5 (full circle) as a function of the pT threshold for MC simulation of signal at sqrt(s)=14 TeV PU 50bx25. The muon is selected at generator level. These fractions are evaluated counting the number of events with a muon in the eta region of interest respect to the total number of events. The plot on the bottom show the relative improvement obtained increasing the CMS acceptance. PNG

$fraction_3p5_2p4_mtt_14TeV.png$

WH analysis where W decay to muon and Higgs in tau-jet pair. The plot shows the muon fractions in the eta regions of interest 1.6-2.4 (empty circle) and 1.6-3.5 (full circle) as a function of the pT threshold for MC simulation of signal at sqrt(s)=14 TeV PU 50bx25. The muon is selected at generator level. These fractions are evaluated counting the number of events with a muon in the eta region of interest respect to the total number of events. The plot on the bottom show the relative improvement obtained increasing the CMS acceptance. PNG

$fraction_mtt_8vs14.pdf$	WH analysis where W decay to muon and Higgs in tau-jet pair. The plot shows the muon fractions in the eta regions of interest 1.6-2.4 as a function of the pT threshold for MC simulation of signal at sqrt(s)=8 TeV (full circle) and sqrt(s)=14 TeV PU 50bx25 (empty circle). The muon, selected at generator level, is also matched with the reconstructed ones (Reco, Global, PF, Reco+Isolation). These fractions are evaluated counting the number of events with a muon in the eta region of interest respect to the total number of events in the CMS muon acceptance (eta 2.5). The fractions at sqrt(s)=8 TeV are lower than that at sqrt(s)=14 TeV and this effect is remarkable at higher pt. Effect can be relevant for a SingleMu trigger selection. PNG

$fraction_mtt_8vs14.pdf$

WH analysis where W decay to muon and Higgs in tau-jet pair. The plot shows the muon fractions in the eta regions of interest 1.6-2.4 as a function of the pT threshold for MC simulation of signal at sqrt(s)=8 TeV (full circle) and sqrt(s)=14 TeV PU 50bx25 (empty circle). The muon, selected at generator level, is also matched with the reconstructed ones (Reco, Global, PF, Reco+Isolation). These fractions are evaluated counting the number of events with a muon in the eta region of interest respect to the total number of events in the CMS muon acceptance (eta 2.5). The fractions at sqrt(s)=8 TeV are lower than that at sqrt(s)=14 TeV and this effect is remarkable at higher pt. Effect can be relevant for a SingleMu trigger selection.

PNG

	Expected significance (S/sqrt(S+B)) as a function of luminosity for the WH channel where W decay to muon and Higgs in a tau pair: one of the two taus then decays in muon and the other hadronically. The curve is obtained as an estrapolation at sqrt(s)=14 TeV of the 2012 result at sqrt(s)=8 TeV and the integrated luminisity 19.5 fb^(-1). The result is based on Monte Carlo simulations at sqrt(s)=8 TeV for the signal and the unreducible backgrounds and on the data-driven estimation for the reducible backgrounds. PNG

Expected significance (S/sqrt(S+B)) as a function of luminosity for the WH channel where W decay to muon and Higgs in a tau pair: one of the two taus then decays in muon and the other hadronically. The curve is obtained as an estrapolation at sqrt(s)=14 TeV of the 2012 result at sqrt(s)=8 TeV and the integrated luminisity 19.5 fb^(-1). The result is based on Monte Carlo simulations at sqrt(s)=8 TeV for the signal and the unreducible backgrounds and on the data-driven estimation for the reducible backgrounds.

PNG

$fraction_mmt_3p5_2p4_1muonL.png$	WH analysis where W decay to muon and Higgs in a tau pair: one of the two taus then decays in muon and the other hadronically. The plot shows the leading (L) muon fractions for events with only one muon in the eta regions of interest 1.6-2.4 (empty circle) and 1.6-3.5 (full circle) as a function of the pT threshold for MC simulation of signal at sqrt(s)=14 TeV PU 50bx25. The two muons are selected at generator level. These fractions are evaluated counting the number of events with the leading muon in the eta region of interest and the subleading muon with eta<1.6 respect to the total number of events. The plot on the bottom show the relative improvement obtained increasing the CMS acceptance. PNG
$fraction_mmt_3p5_2p4_1muonSL.png$	WH analysis where W decay to muon and Higgs in a tau pair: one of the two taus then decays in muon and the other hadronically. The plot shows the subleading (SL) muon fractions for events with only one muon in the eta regions of interest 1.6-2.4 (empty circle) and 1.6-3.5 (full circle) as a function of the pT threshold for MC simulation of signal at sqrt(s)=14 TeV PU 50bx25. The two muons are selected at generator level. These fractions are evaluated counting the number of events with the subleading muon in the eta region of interest and the leading muon with eta<1.6 respect to the total number of events. The plot on the bottom show the relative improvement obtained increasing the CMS acceptance. PNG

$fraction_mmt_3p5_2p4_1muonL.png$

WH analysis where W decay to muon and Higgs in a tau pair: one of the two taus then decays in muon and the other hadronically. The plot shows the leading (L) muon fractions for events with only one muon in the eta regions of interest 1.6-2.4 (empty circle) and 1.6-3.5 (full circle) as a function of the pT threshold for MC simulation of signal at sqrt(s)=14 TeV PU 50bx25. The two muons are selected at generator level. These fractions are evaluated counting the number of events with the leading muon in the eta region of interest and the subleading muon with eta<1.6 respect to the total number of events. The plot on the bottom show the relative improvement obtained increasing the CMS acceptance. PNG

$fraction_mmt_3p5_2p4_1muonSL.png$

WH analysis where W decay to muon and Higgs in a tau pair: one of the two taus then decays in muon and the other hadronically. The plot shows the subleading (SL) muon fractions for events with only one muon in the eta regions of interest 1.6-2.4 (empty circle) and 1.6-3.5 (full circle) as a function of the pT threshold for MC simulation of signal at sqrt(s)=14 TeV PU 50bx25. The two muons are selected at generator level. These fractions are evaluated counting the number of events with the subleading muon in the eta region of interest and the leading muon with eta<1.6 respect to the total number of events. The plot on the bottom show the relative improvement obtained increasing the CMS acceptance. PNG

$fraction_mmt_3p5_2p4_2muonL.png$	WH analysis where W decay to muon and Higgs in a tau pair: one of the two taus then decays in muon and the other hadronically. The plot shows the leading (L) muon fractions for events with both muons in the eta regions of interest 1.6-2.4 (empty circle) and 1.6-3.5 (full circle) as a function of the pT threshold for MC simulation of signal at sqrt(s)=14 TeV PU 50bx25. The two muons are selected at generator level. These fractions are evaluated counting the number of events with the leading and subleading muons in the eta region of interest respect to the total number of events. The plot on the bottom show the relative improvement obtained increasing the CMS acceptance. PNG
$fraction_mmt_3p5_2p4_2muonSL.png$	WH analysis where W decay to muon and Higgs in a tau pair: one of the two taus then decays in muon and the other hadronically. The plot shows the subleading (SL) muon fractions for events with both muons in the eta regions of interest 1.6-2.4 (empty circle) and 1.6-3.5 (full circle) as a function of the pT threshold for MC simulation of signal at sqrt(s)=14 TeV PU 50bx25. The two muons are selected at generator level. These fractions are evaluated counting the number of events with the leading and subleading muons in the eta region of interest respect to the total number of events. The plot on the bottom show the relative improvement obtained increasing the CMS acceptance. PNG

$fraction_mmt_3p5_2p4_2muonL.png$

WH analysis where W decay to muon and Higgs in a tau pair: one of the two taus then decays in muon and the other hadronically. The plot shows the leading (L) muon fractions for events with both muons in the eta regions of interest 1.6-2.4 (empty circle) and 1.6-3.5 (full circle) as a function of the pT threshold for MC simulation of signal at sqrt(s)=14 TeV PU 50bx25. The two muons are selected at generator level. These fractions are evaluated counting the number of events with the leading and subleading muons in the eta region of interest respect to the total number of events. The plot on the bottom show the relative improvement obtained increasing the CMS acceptance. PNG

$fraction_mmt_3p5_2p4_2muonSL.png$

WH analysis where W decay to muon and Higgs in a tau pair: one of the two taus then decays in muon and the other hadronically. The plot shows the subleading (SL) muon fractions for events with both muons in the eta regions of interest 1.6-2.4 (empty circle) and 1.6-3.5 (full circle) as a function of the pT threshold for MC simulation of signal at sqrt(s)=14 TeV PU 50bx25. The two muons are selected at generator level. These fractions are evaluated counting the number of events with the leading and subleading muons in the eta region of interest respect to the total number of events. The plot on the bottom show the relative improvement obtained increasing the CMS acceptance. PNG

$fraction_mmt_8vs14_1muonL.png$ $fraction_mmt_8vs14_1muonSL.png$	WH analysis where W decay to muon and Higgs in a tau pair: one of the two taus then decays in muon and the other hadronically. The plots show the muon fractions in the eta regions of interest 1.6-2.4 as a function of the pT threshold for MC simulation of signal at sqrt(s)=8 TeV (full circle) and sqrt(s)=14 TeV PU 50bx25 (empty circle). The two muons, selected at generator level, are also matched with the reconstructed ones (Reco, Global, PF, Reco+Isolation) assuming that the leading (L) muon comes fron the W and the subleading (SL) muon from the tau. These fractions are evaluated counting the number of events with only one muon (the L on the plot on top or the SL on the plot on bottom) in the eta region of interest respect to the total number of event in the CMS muon acceptance (eta 2.5). The fractions for the L muon at sqrt(s)=8 TeV are lower than that at sqrt(s)=14 TeV while for the SL muon are comparable. Effect can be relevant for a SingleMu trigger selection. Lmuon_PNG , SLmuon_PNG

$fraction_mmt_8vs14_1muonL.png$

$fraction_mmt_8vs14_1muonSL.png$

WH analysis where W decay to muon and Higgs in a tau pair: one of the two taus then decays in muon and the other hadronically. The plots show the muon fractions in the eta regions of interest 1.6-2.4 as a function of the pT threshold for MC simulation of signal at sqrt(s)=8 TeV (full circle) and sqrt(s)=14 TeV PU 50bx25 (empty circle). The two muons, selected at generator level, are also matched with the reconstructed ones (Reco, Global, PF, Reco+Isolation) assuming that the leading (L) muon comes fron the W and the subleading (SL) muon from the tau. These fractions are evaluated counting the number of events with only one muon (the L on the plot on top or the SL on the plot on bottom) in the eta region of interest respect to the total number of event in the CMS muon acceptance (eta 2.5). The fractions for the L muon at sqrt(s)=8 TeV are lower than that at sqrt(s)=14 TeV while for the SL muon are comparable. Effect can be relevant for a SingleMu trigger selection.

Lmuon_PNG , SLmuon_PNG

$fraction_mmt_8vs14_2muonsL.png$ $fraction_mmt_8vs14_2muonsSL.png$	WH analysis where W decay to muon and Higgs in a tau pair: one of the two taus then decays in muon and the other hadronically. The plots show the muon fractions in the eta regions of interest 1.6-2.4 as a function of the pT threshold for MC simulation of signal at sqrt(s)=8 TeV (full circle) and sqrt(s)=14 TeV and PU 50bx25 (empty circle). The two muons, selected at generator level, are also matched with the reconstructed ones (Reco, Global, PF, Reco+Isolation) assuming that the leading (L) muon comes fron the W and the subleading (SL) muon from the tau. These fractions (for the L muon on the plot on top and for the SL muon on the plot on bottom) are evaluated counting the number of events with both L and SL muons in the eta region of interest respect to the total number of event in the CMS muon acceptance (eta 2.5). The fractions at sqrt(s)=8 TeV are lower than that at sqrt(s)=14 TeV . Effect can be relevant for SingleMu or DoubleMu trigger selection. Lmuon_PNG , SmuonL_PNG

$fraction_mmt_8vs14_2muonsL.png$

$fraction_mmt_8vs14_2muonsSL.png$

WH analysis where W decay to muon and Higgs in a tau pair: one of the two taus then decays in muon and the other hadronically. The plots show the muon fractions in the eta regions of interest 1.6-2.4 as a function of the pT threshold for MC simulation of signal at sqrt(s)=8 TeV (full circle) and sqrt(s)=14 TeV and PU 50bx25 (empty circle). The two muons, selected at generator level, are also matched with the reconstructed ones (Reco, Global, PF, Reco+Isolation) assuming that the leading (L) muon comes fron the W and the subleading (SL) muon from the tau. These fractions (for the L muon on the plot on top and for the SL muon on the plot on bottom) are evaluated counting the number of events with both L and SL muons in the eta region of interest respect to the total number of event in the CMS muon acceptance (eta 2.5). The fractions at sqrt(s)=8 TeV are lower than that at sqrt(s)=14 TeV . Effect can be relevant for SingleMu or DoubleMu trigger selection.

Lmuon_PNG , SmuonL_PNG

Additional material

	Post-LS1 geometry. JPG

Post-LS1 geometry. JPG

Event displays

Here we should collect a few nice event displays with hits in the GEM stations.

Attachments

Topic attachments
I	Attachment	History	Action	Size	Date	Who	Comment
pdf	Full-Muon-Detail-May-2013.pdf	r1	manage	237.6 K	2013-05-24 - 14:56	KerstinHoepfner	Post-LS1 muon geometry
pdf	H-2mu-efficiency-vs-ineff-CSC.pdf	r1	manage	69.2 K	2013-04-09 - 11:45	PaoloGiacomelli	H2Mu in VBF channel, Efficiency as a function of local inefficiency of CSCs with and w/o the addition of GEM disks
png	H-2mu-efficiency-vs-ineff-CSC.png	r1	manage	285.2 K	2013-04-09 - 11:45	PaoloGiacomelli	H2Mu in VBF channel, Efficiency as a function of local inefficiency of CSCs with and w/o the addition of GEM disks
pdf	H-4l-efficiency-gain.pdf	r1	manage	59.8 K	2013-04-09 - 12:13	PaoloGiacomelli	Higgs to 4 muons. Efficiency gain with the addition of GEM disks.
png	H-4l-efficiency-gain.png	r1	manage	251.9 K	2013-04-09 - 12:13	PaoloGiacomelli	Higgs to 4 muons. Efficiency gain with the addition of GEM disks.
pdf	H-4mu-eff-vs-local-ineff-CSC.pdf	r1	manage	71.9 K	2013-04-09 - 12:01	PaoloGiacomelli	Higgs to 4 muons. Efficiency as a function of local inefficiency of CSCs with and w/o the addition of GEM disks
png	H-4mu-eff-vs-local-ineff-CSC.png	r1	manage	308.2 K	2013-04-09 - 12:01	PaoloGiacomelli	Higgs to 4 muons. Efficiency as a function of local inefficiency of CSCs with and w/o the addition of GEM disks
gif	H2Mu_EffvsEta.gif	r1	manage	66.1 K	2013-03-21 - 19:22	KerstinHoepfner	H2Mu in VBF channel, Efficiency as a fct of eta, no PU, plot by Adrian
pdf	H2Mu_EffvsEta.pdf	r1	manage	15.9 K	2013-03-21 - 19:23	KerstinHoepfner	H2Mu in VBF channel, Efficiency as a fct of eta, no PU, plot by Adrian
gif	H2Mu_EffvsTriggerpt.gif	r1	manage	62.2 K	2013-03-21 - 19:23	KerstinHoepfner	H2Mu in VBF channel, Efficiency as a fct of trigger pT, no PU, plot by Adrian
pdf	H2Mu_EffvsTriggerpt.pdf	r1	manage	15.0 K	2013-03-21 - 19:23	KerstinHoepfner	H2Mu in VBF channel, Efficiency as a fct of trigger pT, no PU, plot by Adrian
jpg	H2Tau_GainWithGEM.jpg	r1	manage	95.1 K	2013-05-15 - 19:34	KerstinHoepfner	H2Tau Gain with GEMs
pdf	H2Tau_GainWithGEM.pdf	r1	manage	52.7 K	2013-05-15 - 19:34	KerstinHoepfner	H2Tau Gain with GEMs
jpg	H2Tau_eta.jpg	r1	manage	76.3 K	2013-05-15 - 19:32	KerstinHoepfner
pdf	H2Tau_eta.pdf	r1	manage	44.5 K	2013-05-15 - 19:32	KerstinHoepfner
jpg	H2Tau_triggerPt.jpg	r1	manage	86.9 K	2013-05-15 - 19:44	KerstinHoepfner	H2Tau Number of evts as fct of trigger threshold
pdf	H2Tau_triggerPt.pdf	r1	manage	52.0 K	2013-05-15 - 19:33	KerstinHoepfner	H2Tau Number of evts as fct of trigger threshold
pdf	Muon-postLS1-geometry.pdf	r1	manage	237.6 K	2013-05-24 - 15:02	KerstinHoepfner	Post-LS1 muon geometry
png	expected_limits_14TeV.png	r1	manage	145.6 K	2013-04-03 - 18:18	KerstinHoepfner	H2Mu expected sensitivity at 14 TeV
pdf	fraction_3p5_2p4_mtt_14.pdf	r1	manage	21.5 K	2013-04-29 - 15:18	RaffaellaRadogna	WH in mtt, Muon fractions in 1.6<\|eta\|<2.4 and 1.6<\|eta\|<3.5 as a function of the pT threshold at 14 TeV PU50bx25.
png	fraction_3p5_2p4_mtt_14TeV.png	r1	manage	23.5 K	2013-04-29 - 15:18	RaffaellaRadogna	WH in mtt, Muon fractions in 1.6<\|eta\|<2.4 and 1.6<\|eta\|<3.5 as a function of the pT threshold at 14 TeV PU50bx25.
pdf	fraction_mmt_3p5_2p4_1muonL.pdf	r1	manage	19.5 K	2013-04-29 - 15:41	RaffaellaRadogna	WH in mmt, Leading Muon fractions for events with only one muon in 1.6<\|eta\|<2.4 and 1.6<\|eta\|<3.5 as a function of the pT threshold at 14 TeV PU50bx25.
png	fraction_mmt_3p5_2p4_1muonL.png	r1	manage	25.7 K	2013-04-29 - 15:41	RaffaellaRadogna	WH in mmt, Leading Muon fractions for events with only one muon in 1.6<\|eta\|<2.4 and 1.6<\|eta\|<3.5 as a function of the pT threshold at 14 TeV PU50bx25.
pdf	fraction_mmt_3p5_2p4_1muonSL.pdf	r1	manage	19.5 K	2013-04-29 - 15:42	RaffaellaRadogna	WH in mmt, SubLeading Muon fractions for events with only one muon in 1.6<\|eta\|<2.4 and 1.6<\|eta\|<3.5 as a function of the pT threshold at 14 TeV PU50bx25.
png	fraction_mmt_3p5_2p4_1muonSL.png	r1	manage	25.8 K	2013-04-29 - 15:42	RaffaellaRadogna	WH in mmt, SubLeading Muon fractions for events with only one muon in 1.6<\|eta\|<2.4 and 1.6<\|eta\|<3.5 as a function of the pT threshold at 14 TeV PU50bx25.
pdf	fraction_mmt_3p5_2p4_2muonL.pdf	r1	manage	20.0 K	2013-04-29 - 15:44	RaffaellaRadogna	WH in mmt, Leading Muon fractions for events with both muons in 1.6<\|eta\|<2.4 and 1.6<\|eta\|<3.5 as a function of the pT threshold at 14 TeV PU50bx25.
png	fraction_mmt_3p5_2p4_2muonL.png	r1	manage	24.3 K	2013-04-29 - 15:44	RaffaellaRadogna	WH in mmt, Leading Muon fractions for events with both muons in 1.6<\|eta\|<2.4 and 1.6<\|eta\|<3.5 as a function of the pT threshold at 14 TeV PU50bx25.
pdf	fraction_mmt_3p5_2p4_2muonSL.pdf	r1	manage	19.2 K	2013-04-29 - 15:45	RaffaellaRadogna	WH in mmt, SubLeading Muon fractions for events with both muons in 1.6<\|eta\|<2.4 and 1.6<\|eta\|<3.5 as a function of the pT threshold at 14 TeV PU50bx25.
png	fraction_mmt_3p5_2p4_2muonSL.png	r1	manage	25.1 K	2013-04-29 - 15:45	RaffaellaRadogna	WH in mmt, SubLeading Muon fractions for events with both muons in 1.6<\|eta\|<2.4 and 1.6<\|eta\|<3.5 as a function of the pT threshold at 14 TeV PU50bx25.
pdf	fraction_mmt_8vs14_1muonL.pdf	r1	manage	25.9 K	2013-04-30 - 18:56	RaffaellaRadogna	WH in mmt, Leading Muons fractions, as a function of the pT threshold, for events with only one muon in 1.6<\|eta\|<2.4 at 8 TeV and 14 TeV PU50bx25.
png	fraction_mmt_8vs14_1muonL.png	r1	manage	25.9 K	2013-04-30 - 18:56	RaffaellaRadogna	WH in mmt, Leading Muons fractions, as a function of the pT threshold, for events with only one muon in 1.6<\|eta\|<2.4 at 8 TeV and 14 TeV PU50bx25.
pdf	fraction_mmt_8vs14_1muonSL.pdf	r1	manage	27.2 K	2013-04-30 - 18:55	RaffaellaRadogna	WH in mmt, SubLeading Muons fractions, as a function of the pT threshold, for events with only one muon in 1.6<\|eta\|<2.4 at 8 TeV and 14 TeV PU50bx25.
png	fraction_mmt_8vs14_1muonSL.png	r1	manage	27.0 K	2013-04-30 - 18:55	RaffaellaRadogna	WH in mmt, SubLeading Muons fractions, as a function of the pT threshold, for events with only one muon in 1.6<\|eta\|<2.4 at 8 TeV and 14 TeV PU50bx25.
pdf	fraction_mmt_8vs14_2muonsL.pdf	r1	manage	26.4 K	2013-04-30 - 18:37	RaffaellaRadogna	WH in mmt, Leading Muons fractions, as a function of the pT threshold, for events with both muons in 1.6<\|eta\|<2.4 at 8 TeV and 14 TeV PU50bx25.
png	fraction_mmt_8vs14_2muonsL.png	r1	manage	25.5 K	2013-04-30 - 18:37	RaffaellaRadogna	WH in mmt, Leading Muons fractions, as a function of the pT threshold, for events with both muons in 1.6<\|eta\|<2.4 at 8 TeV and 14 TeV PU50bx25.
pdf	fraction_mmt_8vs14_2muonsSL.pdf	r1	manage	28.0 K	2013-04-30 - 18:53	RaffaellaRadogna	WH in mmt, SubLeading Muons fractions, as a function of the pT threshold, for events with both muons in 1.6<\|eta\|<2.4 at 8 TeV and 14 TeV PU50bx25.
png	fraction_mmt_8vs14_2muonsSL.png	r1	manage	28.4 K	2013-04-30 - 18:36	RaffaellaRadogna	WH in mmt, SubLeading Muons fractions, as a function of the pT threshold, for events with both muons in 1.6<\|eta\|<2.4 at 8 TeV and 14 TeV PU50bx25.
pdf	fraction_mtt_8vs14.pdf	r1	manage	34.9 K	2013-04-18 - 11:35	RaffaellaRadogna	WH in mtt, Muon fractions in 1.6<\|eta\|<2.4 as a function of the pT threshold at 8 TeV and 14 TeV PU50bx25.
png	fraction_mtt_8vs14.png	r1	manage	25.3 K	2013-04-18 - 11:36	RaffaellaRadogna	WH in mtt, Muon fractions in 1.6<\|eta\|<2.4 as a function of the pT threshold at 8 TeV and 14 TeV PU50bx25.
png	sensitivity_14TeV.png	r1	manage	193.6 K	2013-04-03 - 18:26	KerstinHoepfner
pdf	significance_mmt.pdf	r1	manage	14.2 K	2013-04-29 - 14:56	RaffaellaRadogna
png	significance_mmt.png	r1	manage	11.8 K	2013-04-29 - 14:56	RaffaellaRadogna
pdf	significance_mtt.pdf	r1	manage	13.9 K	2013-04-29 - 14:57	RaffaellaRadogna
png	significance_mtt.png	r1	manage	11.4 K	2013-04-29 - 14:54	RaffaellaRadogna

Topic revision: r16 - 2015-05-27 - KerstinHoepfner

MPGD

Public webs

- Cern Search
- TWiki Search
- Google Search
MPGD All webs

Copyright &© 2008-2023 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback