-- ThomasKlijnsma - 2018-02-06

Pre-approval comments v1

Test image:


Fill in the StatComm questionnaire: http://cern.ch/cms-stat-questionnaire


Datacards should be checked and approved by the combination group


Fill in the HIG Muon questionnaire: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/TWikiHIG-MUO


For all the plots: add theory predictions

A line indicating the SM prediction is added to all the plots concerning combinations of differential cross sections. The 2D coupling scans already had SM predictions.

The normalization of the SM line is set to the YR4 N3LO cross section for gluon fusion: 48.52 fb.

pT, for smH and ggH+xH (split):

twoPanel_pthSpectrum.png twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum.png

nJets, pT_jet and rapidity:

twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum.png twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png

For all the plots: add systematic error uncertainty in the plots

The following set of plots has their error bar split between stat+syst (the vertical line) and stat-only (the filled block).

Include tables with numerical values of cross-sections & uncertainties in the paper draft, including separation of systematics and statistics. Correlation matrix to be released as well (


Total XS: separate also here syst stat


Cross checks for the BR: BR vs pt, BR using the Njets categorisation

Fitted it for totalXS, and all the observables Agree within uncertainties

For kb vs kc, kt vs kg, kb vs kt: add also the 95% CL from the 1D scan

Code done but redo for reweighted

Add additional deformation of the kc,kb spectrum going in other directions (closer to 0,0)


<<<< TODAY:

For supplementary material: when modifying the BR for kb,kc add a third fit floating also the overall normalisation

Redo with proper ws

kt vs kg: check the constraints tha we get using only shape floating also the overall normalisation

Redo with proper ws

Possible for supplementary material: include also the variation of the BR also for kt,kg and check also here the constraints only from shape floating the overall normalisation



Find a new name for kg which has a different parametrisation wrt couplings combination

Probably "cg"

Most notably: boosted ggH(bb) needs to be added in the pt spectrum and in the kt,kg interpretation. Preliminary list of discussed checks: compare the theory predictions currently used for boosted ggHbb vs HRES, ggHbb team should provide the datacards as soon as possible, consider to add an additional theory uncertainty for the mtop treatment above 350 GeV

Need Vs ws.

Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
PNGpng parabolas_smH_PTH_combination.png r1 manage 36.7 K 2018-02-07 - 11:55 ThomasKlijnsma  
PNGpng parabolas_smH_PTH_combination_statonly.png r1 manage 36.8 K 2018-02-07 - 11:55 ThomasKlijnsma  
PNGpng test.png r1 manage 41.3 K 2018-02-07 - 11:36 ThomasKlijnsma  
PNGpng twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png r1 manage 40.2 K 2018-02-07 - 11:41 ThomasKlijnsma  
PNGpng twoPanel_pthSpectrum.png r1 manage 44.1 K 2018-02-07 - 11:41 ThomasKlijnsma  
PNGpng twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum.png r1 manage 41.8 K 2018-02-07 - 11:41 ThomasKlijnsma  
PNGpng twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum.png r1 manage 49.7 K 2018-02-07 - 11:41 ThomasKlijnsma  
PNGpng twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png r1 manage 31.3 K 2018-02-07 - 11:41 ThomasKlijnsma  

This topic: Main > TWikiUsers > ThomasKlijnsma > PreApprovalCommentsV1
Topic revision: r2 - 2018-02-07 - ThomasKlijnsma
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2022 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback