Other scenarios:

Please define here the scenarios in addition to the suggested ones - Please provide all the details of your requests! (Datasets -PU-Conditions- Lumis - aging- special event content)

Scenario Id Requestor Geometry Average Pileup Luminosity Pixel aged Strips aged EB aged EE aged HB aged HE aged HF aged Motivation Priority
1a GED/PF Phase 1 20 0 N N N N N N N baseline to decouple geometry, PU, aging Priority
1b GED/PF Phase 1 70 0 N N N N N N N baseline to decouple geometry, PU, aging Priority
4a GED/PF Phase 1 140 0 N N N N N N N baseline to decouple geometry, PU, aging Priority

ECAL

All in complete simulation except one point for the W to study the linearity.

nb Requester Event Type #evts Software + Lumi PU 20/BX PU 60/BX PU 100/BX PU 140/BX Other?
1 ECAL Z->ee (eta_e1 eta_e2 in -1.5 to 1.5) 30000x4agingx3PU 0-300-1000-3000 fb-1 yes yes no yes complete (py special + Inter-Calib special)
2 ECAL Z->ee (eta_e1 eta_e2 in 1.45 to 4 ) 30000x4agingx3PU 0-300-1000-3000 fb-1 yes yes no yes complete (py special + Inter-Calib special)
3 ECAL Z->ee (eta_e1 eta_e2 in 1.45 to 4 ) 30000x2agingx3PU without ES 0-3000 fb-1 yes yes no yes ECAL private production
4 ECAL W->enu (eta_e in 1.45 to 4) 30000x4agingx3PU 0-300-1000-3000 fb-1 yes yes no yes complete (py special + Inter-Calib special)
5 ECAL W->enu (eta_e in 1.45 to 4) effective simulation 30000x4agingx1PU 0-300-1000-3000 fb-1 yes no no no effective
6 ECAL H->gg 20000x4agingx3PU 0-300-1000-3000 fb-1 yes yes no yes effective
7 ECAL H->gg VBF 10000x4agingx3PU 0-300-1000-3000 fb-1 yes yes no yes effective
8 ECAL H->ZZ->4e 10000x4agingx3PU 0-300-1000-3000 fb-1 yes yes no yes effective
9 ECAL HH->4e gg 10000x2agingx2PU 0-3000 fb-1 yes no no yes effective
10 ECAL HH->gg gg 10000x2agingx2PU 0-3000 fb-1 yes no no yes effective
11 ECAL HZ->gg bb 10000x2agingx2PU 0-3000 fb-1 yes no no yes effective
12 ECAL HH->gg bb 10000x2agingx2PU 0-3000 fb-1 yes no no yes effective
13 ECAL M. Graph 2 photons 100000x2agingx2PU 0-3000 fb-1 yes no no yes effective
14 ECAL M. Graph Gamma+jet 100000x2agingx2PU 0-3000 fb-1 yes no no yes effective

All in complete simulation except one point for the W to study the linearity.

nb Requester Event Type #evts Software + Lumi PU 20/BX PU 60/BX PU 100/BX PU 140/BX Other?
1 ECAL Z->ee (eta_e1 eta_e2 in -1.5 to 1.5) 30000x4agingx3PU 0-300-1000-3000 fb-1 yes yes no yes complete (py special + Inter-Calib special)
2 ECAL Z->ee (eta_e1 eta_e2 in 1.45 to 4 ) 30000x4agingx3PU 0-300-1000-3000 fb-1 yes yes no yes complete (py special + Inter-Calib special)
3 ECAL Z->ee (eta_e1 eta_e2 in 1.45 to 4 ) 30000x2agingx3PU without ES 0-3000 fb-1 yes yes no yes ECAL private production
4 ECAL W->enu (eta_e in 1.45 to 4) 30000x4agingx3PU 0-300-1000-3000 fb-1 yes yes no yes complete (py special + Inter-Calib special)
5 ECAL W->enu (eta_e in 1.45 to 4) effective simulation 30000x4agingx1PU 0-300-1000-3000 fb-1 yes no no no effective
6 ECAL H->gg 20000x4agingx3PU 0-300-1000-3000 fb-1 yes yes no yes effective
7 ECAL H->gg VBF 10000x4agingx3PU 0-300-1000-3000 fb-1 yes yes no yes effective
8 ECAL H->ZZ->4e 10000x4agingx3PU 0-300-1000-3000 fb-1 yes yes no yes effective
9 ECAL HH->4e gg 10000x2agingx2PU 0-3000 fb-1 yes no no yes effective
10 ECAL HH->gg gg 10000x2agingx2PU 0-3000 fb-1 yes no no yes effective
11 ECAL HZ->gg bb 10000x2agingx2PU 0-3000 fb-1 yes no no yes effective
12 ECAL HH->gg bb 10000x2agingx2PU 0-3000 fb-1 yes no no yes effective
13 ECAL M. Graph 2 photons 100000x2agingx2PU 0-3000 fb-1 yes no no yes effective
14 ECAL M. Graph Gamma+jet 100000x2agingx2PU 0-3000 fb-1 yes no no yes effective

ttbar GED/PF 100k   Y Y Y        
single 5 GeV pion/flat eta/phi GED/PF 100k   Y Y Y        
single 10 GeV pion/flat eta/phi GED/PF 100k   Y Y Y        
single 50 GeV pion/flat eta/phi GED/PF 100k   Y Y Y        
single 100 GeV pion/flat eta/phi GED/PF 100k   Y Y Y        

Other scenarios:

Please define here the scenarios in addition to the suggested ones - Please provide all the details of your requests! (Datasets -PU-Conditions- Lumis - aging- special event content)

Scenario Id Requestor Geometry Average Pileup Luminosity Pixel aged Strips aged EB aged EE aged HB aged HE aged HF aged Motivation Priority
1a GED/PF Phase 1 20 0 N N N N N N N baseline to decouple geometry, PU, aging Priority
1b GED/PF Phase 1 70 0 N N N N N N N baseline to decouple geometry, PU, aging Priority
4a GED/PF Phase 1 140 0 N N N N N N N baseline to decouple geometry, PU, aging Priority

Lumi scenarios with PU
Scenario Number Geometry Average Pileup Luminosity Pixel aged Strips aged EB aged EE aged HB aged HE aged HF aged Comments
0 Phase 1 70 300 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes CMS aged detectors by LS3 (nominal - 70 PU)
1 Phase 1 70 500 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes CMS aged detectors if LS3 delayed - 70 PU
2 Phase 1 70 1000 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes CMS aged detectors if LS3 canceled - 70 PU
                       
3 Phase 1 140 1000 No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes PostLS3 strips/Pixel changed but phase1 geom for tracking
                       
4 Phase 1 140 1000 No No Yes No Yes No Yes PostLS3 Jeff's mixed scenario #1
5 Phase 1 140 1000 No No Yes No Yes No No PostLS3 Jeff's mixed scenario #2
                       
6 Phase 2 x 3 geom 140 1000 No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes PostLS3 strips/Pixel changed but phase2 geom no tracking
7 Phase 1 140 3000 No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Post- PostLS3 strips/Pixel 'new' but phase1 geom for tracking
SAME AS ABOVE WITHOUT PU (pure detector performance - no reco effect)
Scenario Number Geometry Average Pileup Luminosity Pixel aged Strips aged EB aged EE aged HB aged HE aged HF aged Comments
8 Phase 1 0 300 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes CMS aged detectors by LS3 (No PU)
9 Phase 1 0 500 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes CMS aged detectors if LS3 delayed - (No PU)
10 Phase 1 0 1000 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes CMS aged detectors if LS3 canceled - (No PU)
                       
11 Phase 1 0 1000 No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes PostLS3 strips/Pixel changed but phase1 geom for tracking (No PU)
                       
12 Phase 1 0 1000 No No Yes No Yes No Yes PostLS3 Jeff's mixed scenario #1(No PU)
13 Phase 1 0 1000 No No Yes No Yes No No PostLS3 Jeff's mixed scenario #2(No PU)
                       
14 Phase 2 x 3 geom 0 1000 No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes PostLS3 strips/Pixel changed but phase2 geom no tracking (No PU)
15 Phase 1 0 3000 No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Post- PostLS3 strips/Pixel 'new' but phase1 geom for tracking(No PU)
PERFECT CMS detector - No aging - No PU
Scenario Number Geometry Average Pileup Luminosity Pixel aged Strips aged EB aged EE aged HB aged HE aged HF aged Comments
16 Phase 1 0 - No No No No No No No IDEAL CASE
17 Phase 2 x 3 geom 0 - No No No No No No No IDEAL CASE

Second table for upgrade production

Event type / cfi file DPG/POG/PAG Events per scenario 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Hgg ECAL 30k Y Y Y N N Y N Y N N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y
H to WW ECAL 1000k Y Y Y N N Y N Y N N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r21 < r20 < r19 < r18 < r17 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r21 - 2013-04-26 - unknown
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    Sandbox All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2020 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback