Session 2

19 Nov 2008

Question 1: You are planning to start analysis, where would you go to look for information

  1. starts in
  2. says would go to analysis groups and try to find some links
  3. goes to physics - takes times to find group pages as not visible in the screen
  4. is adviced to scroll down
  5. goes
    1. sees an example of active analyses where could get some inspiration
    2. clarifies that should really learn how to write code, thinks this is not the page
  6. back to icms, goes to workbook
    1. reads the contents down to "how to make an analysis"
  7. goes to
    1. reads the page and thinks this would be a good starting point

Question 2: You will have muons in your analysis. What the muon data object contains, find the information.

  1. says it is detector based object and related to POG
  2. stays in the WorkBOok to see if there is something related to muons
    1. sees particle candidates and say might have a look
  3. goes to
    1. follows
    2. finds the figure
    3. thinks that there is a class reco::cndidate from which all the object inherit
    4. understands that needs to find the class documentation
    5. scrolls through the page, goes with mouse over reco::Candidate but this is not a link
    6. click on RECO
  5. follows
    1. scrolls through the page
    2. thinks this does not contain the docs on the class itself
    3. gets a hint that it does
    4. reads the comlumn titles: InputTag Containers Description
    5. looks with ctlr-F for muons
    6. clicks on reco::TrackCollection, is warned that the link is slow
  6. comes to
    1. says that there are some methods, and is not yet familiar with all the names, but think that with this information can get the information needed

Question 3: Find a useful example code to access the muon data.

  1. thinks that there is tutorial
  2. goes to
    1. scrolls down to lowert part of the page
    2. does not see muon analysis page (even if on the screen)
  3. goes to tutorials
    1. thinks that these are generic tutorials which might contain useful example but is not a collection of examples
  4. back to workbook
    1. looks in the left bar
  5. goes to
    1. scrolls down, goes back
  6. again in
    1. looks for exampl (with ctrl-F)
    2. finds Example analysis of CRAFT data, not interested
    3. tells that the keyword she looks for Example
    4. says that "Introductory framework tutorial" could contain a link
    5. keywords example + tutorials but the tutorial page gave generic tutorials and example give a very specific example
    6. is adviced to read again the contents - starts in detail
    7. sees Analysis Tool Starterkit
  7. goes to
    1. reads through - says that this is important to know (of setting up env)
    2. does not see examples of muons or jets of what ever
    3. scrolls down
    4. scrolls up to the page, reads the intro which says that brings to physics level plot in 60 mins and thinks this should be the page
    5. see producing pat layer-1 objects, sees link to startedkit tutorial
  8. goes to
    1. sees "physics histograms" and even muon in the figure
    2. says she would try this page

Question 3: You would like to know if other have done similar analysis in physics working group. Where would you go to look for information?

  1. would go to b-physics and look for links to previous analysis but thinks this is not the correct place to look for software oriented stuff
  2. looks in the WorkBook, thinks there is nothing on a specific analysis
  3. looks under "analysis tools", scrolls up and down
  4. asks if people already having done analysis really provide the information and is explained that some of the analysis code is common to a group and resides somewhere in cvs
  5. thinks that starts with b-physics but having seen the page thinks there is not many much
  6. goes to (still in a tab)
  7. goes to
    1. thinks of getting an overview who did what
    2. finds a list of analyses
  8. goes to
    1. thinks tha cadi is a document system
  9. back to
    1. thinks that this page give docs in generic terms but gives info on physics terms but not how the analysis was done software-wise
  10. back to
    1. thinks PAG page is not the best place to look
    2. scrolls down and finds tools and thinks that maybe one of those could be help
  11. goes to
  12. follows the link to cvs CMSSW/HeavyFlavourAnalysis
  13. thinks that finally PAG was the place to go

-- KatiLassilaPerini - 26 Feb 2009

Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r2 < r1 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r2 - 2020-08-31 - TWikiAdminUser
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    Sandbox/SandboxArchive All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2023 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback