-- XiangyangJU - 13-Nov-2009
Egamma Slice On Line Monitoring
- Egamma Slice On Line Monitoring
- General Description
- Electron: EF/TrigEgammaRec_egamma
- Electron: EF/TrigEFElectronHypo
- Electron: EF/TrigEFElectron_e10_loose
- Electron: L2/TrigL2EgammaFEX
- Electron: L2/TrigL2EgammaHypo
- Electron: L2/TrigL2CaloHypo_e10_loose
- Photon: EF/TrigEgammaRec_egamma
- Photon: EF/TrigEFPhotonHypo_g10_loose
- Photon: EF/PhotonHypo
- Photon: L2/TrigL2EgammaFEX
- Photon: L2/TrigL2EgammaHypo
- Photon: L2/TrigL2PhotonHypo_g10_loose
- DQ flag description
- What to do during your shift?
- General Description
General Description
editing....Electron: EF/TrigEgammaRec_egamma
| Histogram Name | Description | Expectations |
|---|---|---|
| egIsEM Click for image. |
number of candidates that passed loose, medium, and tight cuts | ...................................... |
| ClusterEt Click for image. |
transverse energy of EM cluster | ...................................... |
| TrackPt Click for image. |
transverse momentum of track | ...................................... |
| dEta Click for image. |
difference between the cluster eta (first sampling) and the eta of the track extrapolated to the first sampling: ηstripscluster -ηID, where ηstripscluster is computed in the first sampling of the electromagnetic calorimeter, where the granularity is very fine, and ηID is the pseudo-rapidity of the track extrapolated to the calorimeter | ...................................... |
| dPhi Click for image. |
difference between the cluster phi (second sampling) and the phi of the track extrapolated to the second sampling : φmiddlecluster -φID, where φmiddlecluster is computed in the second compartment of the electromagnetic calorimeter and φID is the azimuth of the track extrapolated to the calorimeter | ...................................... |
| EoverP Click for image. |
ratio of the cluster energy and the track momentum | ...................................... |
| rTRT Click for image. |
EFEgamma Hypo ratio of TRT high threshold hits | ...................................... |
| F1 Click for image. |
E1/E -- fraction of energy reconstructed in the first sampling with E1 the energy reconstructed in all strips belonging to the cluster and E the total energy reconstructed in the electromagnetic calorimeter cluster. | ...................................... |
| e237 Click for image. |
uncalibrated energy (sum of cells) of the middle sampling in a rectangle of size 3x7 (in cell units eta X phi) | ...................................... |
| e277 Click for image. |
uncalibrated energy (sum of cells) of the middle sampling in a rectangle of size 7x7 (in cell units eta X phi). | ...................................... |
| EtHad1 Click for image. |
transverse energy in the first sampling of the hadronic calorimeters behind the cluster | ...................................... |
| WEta1 Click for image. |
shower width using three strips around the one with the maximal energy deposit : ω3 strips = √{∑ Ei × ( i-imax)2 / ∑ Ei}, where i is the number of the strip and imax the strip number of the most energetic one | ...................................... |
| WEta2 Click for image. |
the lateral width is calculated with a window of 3× 5 cells using the energy weighted sum over all cells, which depends on the particle impact point inside the cell: ωη 2 = √ (∑ Ei × η2)/(∑ Ei) -((∑ Ei × η)/(∑ Ei))2, where Ei is the energy of the i-th cell | ...................................... |
| E2tsts1 Click for image. |
energy of the cell corresponding to second energy maximum in the first sampling | ...................................... |
| Emins1 Click for image. |
energy reconstructed in the strip with the minimal value between the first and second maximum | ...................................... |
| Fracs1 Click for image. |
shower shape in the shower core : [ E(± 3) - E(± 1)]/E(± 1), where E(± n) is the energy in ± n strips around the strip with highest energy | ...................................... |
| wtots1 Click for image. |
shower width is determined in a window Δη×Δφ = 0.0625 ×~0.2, corresponding typically to 40 strips in η : ωtot1=√{∑ Ei × ( i-imax)2 / ∑ Ei}, where i is the strip number and imax the strip number of the first local maximum. | ...................................... |
| EtConeIso Click for image. |
EFEgamma Hypo fraction of Et in a ring of 0.1<DR<0.2 above noise to total ET | ...................................... |
| nBLayerHits Click for image. |
number of B layer hits | ...................................... |
| nPixelHits Click for image. |
number of pixel detector hits | ...................................... |
| nSCTHits Click for image. |
number of SCT detector hits | ...................................... |
| nTRTHits Click for image. |
number of TRT detector hits | ...................................... |
| nTRTHitsHighTh Click for image. |
number of high threshold TRT detector hits | ...................................... |
| nTRTHitsHighTrOutLiers Click for image. |
number of outliers high threshold TRT hits | ...................................... |
| nTRTHitsOutLiers Click for image. |
number of outliers TRT hits | ...................................... |
Electron: EF/TrigEFElectronHypo
| Histogram Name | Description | Expectations | |
|---|---|---|---|
| e10_loose/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e10_medium/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e5_NoCut/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e5_NoCut_FwdBackTrk/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e5_NoCut_IdScan/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e5_NoCut_SiTrk/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e5_NoCut_TRT/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | ...................................... |
Electron: EF/TrigEFElectron_e10_loose
| Histogram Name | Description | Expectations |
|---|---|---|
| egIsEM Click for image. |
number of candidates that passed loose, medium, and tight cuts | ...................................... |
| ClusterEt Click for image. |
transverse energy of EM cluster | ...................................... |
| TrackPt Click for image. |
transverse momentum of track | ...................................... |
| dEta Click for image. |
difference between the cluster eta (first sampling) and the eta of the track extrapolated to the first sampling: ηstripscluster -ηID, where ηstripscluster is computed in the first sampling of the electromagnetic calorimeter, where the granularity is very fine, and ηID is the pseudo-rapidity of the track extrapolated to the calorimeter | ...................................... |
| dPhi Click for image. |
difference between the cluster phi (second sampling) and the phi of the track extrapolated to the second sampling : φmiddlecluster -φID, where φmiddlecluster is computed in the second compartment of the electromagnetic calorimeter and φID is the azimuth of the track extrapolated to the calorimeter | ...................................... |
| EoverP Click for image. |
ratio of the cluster energy and the track momentum | ...................................... |
| rTRT Click for image. |
EFEgamma Hypo ratio of TRT high threshold hits | ...................................... |
| F1 Click for image. |
E1/E -- fraction of energy reconstructed in the first sampling with E1 the energy reconstructed in all strips belonging to the cluster and E the total energy reconstructed in the electromagnetic calorimeter cluster. | ...................................... |
| e237 Click for image. |
uncalibrated energy (sum of cells) of the middle sampling in a rectangle of size 3x7 (in cell units eta X phi) | ...................................... |
| e277 Click for image. |
uncalibrated energy (sum of cells) of the middle sampling in a rectangle of size 7x7 (in cell units eta X phi). | ...................................... |
| EtHad1 Click for image. |
transverse energy in the first sampling of the hadronic calorimeters behind the cluster | ...................................... |
| WEta1 Click for image. |
shower width using three strips around the one with the maximal energy deposit : ω3 strips = √{∑ Ei × ( i-imax)2 / ∑ Ei}, where i is the number of the strip and imax the strip number of the most energetic one | ...................................... |
| WEta2 Click for image. |
the lateral width is calculated with a window of 3× 5 cells using the energy weighted sum over all cells, which depends on the particle impact point inside the cell: ωη 2 = √ (∑ Ei × η2)/(∑ Ei) -((∑ Ei × η)/(∑ Ei))2, where Ei is the energy of the i-th cell | ...................................... |
| E2tsts1 Click for image. |
energy of the cell corresponding to second energy maximum in the first sampling | ...................................... |
| Emins1 Click for image. |
energy reconstructed in the strip with the minimal value between the first and second maximum | ...................................... |
| Fracs1 Click for image. |
shower shape in the shower core : [ E(± 3) - E(± 1)]/E(± 1), where E(± n) is the energy in ± n strips around the strip with highest energy | ...................................... |
| wtots1 Click for image. |
shower width is determined in a window Δη×Δφ = 0.0625 ×~0.2, corresponding typically to 40 strips in η : ωtot1=√{∑ Ei × ( i-imax)2 / ∑ Ei}, where i is the strip number and imax the strip number of the first local maximum. | ...................................... |
| EtConeIso Click for image. |
EFEgamma Hypo fraction of Et in a ring of 0.1<DR<0.2 above noise to total ET | ...................................... |
| nBLayerHits Click for image. |
number of B layer hits | ...................................... |
| nPixelHits Click for image. |
number of pixel detector hits | ...................................... |
| nSCTHits Click for image. |
number of SCT detector hits | ...................................... |
| nTRTHits Click for image. |
number of TRT detector hits | ...................................... |
| nTRTHitsHighTh Click for image. |
number of high threshold TRT detector hits | ...................................... |
| nTRTHitsHighTrOutLiers Click for image. |
number of outliers high threshold TRT hits | ...................................... |
| nTRTHitsOutLiers Click for image. |
number of outliers TRT hits | ...................................... |
Electron: L2/TrigL2EgammaFEX
| Histogram Name | Description | Expectations |
|---|---|---|
| EtavsPhiEgamma Click for image. |
eta position of EM clusters vs phi position | ...................................... |
| EtaEgamma Click for image. |
eta position of EM clusters | ...................................... |
| PhiEgamma Click for image. |
phi position of EM clusters | ...................................... |
| EtEgamma Click for image. |
transverse energy of EM Clusters | ...................................... |
| Had1Et Click for image. |
transverse energy in the first sampling of the hadronic calorimeters behind the cluster | ...................................... |
| Rcore Click for image. |
E237/E277 ,where E237 is uncalibrated energy (sum of cells) of the middle sampling in a rectangle of size 3x7 (in cell units eta X phi), and E277 is uncalibrated energy (sum of cells) of the middle sampling in a rectangle of size 7x7 (in cell units eta X phi) | ...................................... |
| Eratio Click for image. |
fraction difference of EM cluster emaxs1 and e2tsts1, where emaxs1 is the brief energy of strip with maximal energy deposit, e2tsts1 is the energy of the cell corresponding to second energy maximum in the first sampling | ...................................... |
Electron: L2/TrigL2EgammaHypo
| Histogram Name | Description | Expectations | |
|---|---|---|---|
| e10_loose/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e10_medium/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e5_NoCut/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e5_NoCut_FwdBackTrk/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e5_NoCut_IdScan/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e5_NoCut_SiTrk/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e5_NoCut_TRT/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | ...................................... |
Electron: L2/TrigL2CaloHypo_e10_loose
| Histogram Name | Description | Expectations |
|---|---|---|
| CutCounter Click for image. |
brief cuts of Photon | ...................................... |
| dEta Click for image. |
difference between the cluster eta (first sampling) and the eta of the track extrapolated to the first sampling: ηstripscluster -ηID, where ηstripscluster is computed in the first sampling of the electromagnetic calorimeter, where the granularity is very fine, and ηID is the pseudo-rapidity of the track extrapolated to the calorimeter | ...................................... |
| dPhi Click for image. |
difference between the cluster phi (second sampling) and the phi of the track extrapolated to the second sampling : φmiddlecluster -φID, where φmiddlecluster is computed in the second compartment of the electromagnetic calorimeter and φID is the azimuth of the track extrapolated to the calorimeter | ...................................... |
| Et_em Click for image. |
transverse energy of EM cluster | ...................................... |
| Et_had Click for image. |
transverse energy in the hadronic calorimeters behind the cluster | ...................................... |
| Rcore Click for image. |
E237/E277 ,where E237 is uncalibrated energy (sum of cells) of the middle sampling in a rectangle of size 3x7 (in cell units eta X phi), and E277 is uncalibrated energy (sum of cells) of the middle sampling in a rectangle of size 7x7 (in cell units eta X phi) | ...................................... |
| Eratio Click for image. |
fraction difference of EM cluster emaxs1 and e2tsts1, where emaxs1 is the brief energy of strip with maximal energy deposit, e2tsts1 is the energy of the cell corresponding to second energy maximum in the first sampling | ...................................... |
| EtaBin Click for image. |
L2 Calo Hypo entries per eta bin | ...................................... |
| F1 Click for image. |
E1/E -- fraction of energy reconstructed in the first sampling with E1 the energy reconstructed in all strips belonging to the cluster and E the total energy reconstructed in the electromagnetic calorimeter clust | ...................................... |
Photon: EF/TrigEgammaRec_egamma
| Histogram Name | Description | Expectations |
|---|---|---|
| egIsEM Click for image. |
number of candidates that passed loose, medium, and tight cuts | ...................................... |
| ClusterEt Click for image. |
transverse energy of EM cluster | ...................................... |
| TrackPt Click for image. |
transverse momentum of track | ...................................... |
| dEta Click for image. |
difference between the cluster eta (first sampling) and the eta of the track extrapolated to the first sampling: ηstripscluster -ηID, where ηstripscluster is computed in the first sampling of the electromagnetic calorimeter, where the granularity is very fine, and ηID is the pseudo-rapidity of the track extrapolated to the calorimeter | ...................................... |
| dPhi Click for image. |
difference between the cluster phi (second sampling) and the phi of the track extrapolated to the second sampling : φmiddlecluster -φID, where φmiddlecluster is computed in the second compartment of the electromagnetic calorimeter and φID is the azimuth of the track extrapolated to the calorimeter | ...................................... |
| EoverP Click for image. |
ratio of the cluster energy and the track momentum | ...................................... |
| rTRT Click for image. |
EFEgamma Hypo ratio of TRT high threshold hits | ...................................... |
| F1 Click for image. |
E1/E -- fraction of energy reconstructed in the first sampling with E1 the energy reconstructed in all strips belonging to the cluster and E the total energy reconstructed in the electromagnetic calorimeter cluster. | ...................................... |
| e237 Click for image. |
uncalibrated energy (sum of cells) of the middle sampling in a rectangle of size 3x7 (in cell units eta X phi) | ...................................... |
| e277 Click for image. |
uncalibrated energy (sum of cells) of the middle sampling in a rectangle of size 7x7 (in cell units eta X phi). | ...................................... |
| EtHad1 Click for image. |
transverse energy in the first sampling of the hadronic calorimeters behind the cluster | ...................................... |
| WEta1 Click for image. |
shower width using three strips around the one with the maximal energy deposit : ω3 strips = √{∑ Ei × ( i-imax)2 / ∑ Ei}, where i is the number of the strip and imax the strip number of the most energetic one | ...................................... |
| WEta2 Click for image. |
the lateral width is calculated with a window of 3× 5 cells using the energy weighted sum over all cells, which depends on the particle impact point inside the cell: ωη 2 = √ (∑ Ei × η2)/(∑ Ei) -((∑ Ei × η)/(∑ Ei))2, where Ei is the energy of the i-th cell | ...................................... |
| E2tsts1 Click for image. |
energy of the cell corresponding to second energy maximum in the first sampling | ...................................... |
| Emins1 Click for image. |
energy reconstructed in the strip with the minimal value between the first and second maximum | ...................................... |
| Fracs1 Click for image. |
shower shape in the shower core : [ E(± 3) - E(± 1)]/E(± 1), where E(± n) is the energy in ± n strips around the strip with highest energy | ...................................... |
| wtots1 Click for image. |
shower width is determined in a window Δη×Δφ = 0.0625 ×~0.2, corresponding typically to 40 strips in η : ωtot1=√{∑ Ei × ( i-imax)2 / ∑ Ei}, where i is the strip number and imax the strip number of the first local maximum. | ...................................... |
| EtConeIso Click for image. |
EFEgamma Hypo fraction of Et in a ring of 0.1<DR<0.2 above noise to total ET | ...................................... |
| nBLayerHits Click for image. |
number of B layer hits | ...................................... |
| nPixelHits Click for image. |
number of pixel detector hits | ...................................... |
| nSCTHits Click for image. |
number of SCT detector hits | ...................................... |
| nTRTHits Click for image. |
number of TRT detector hits | ...................................... |
| nTRTHitsHighTh Click for image. |
number of high threshold TRT detector hits | ...................................... |
| nTRTHitsHighTrOutLiers Click for image. |
number of outliers high threshold TRT hits | ...................................... |
| nTRTHitsOutLiers Click for image. |
number of outliers TRT hits | ...................................... |
Photon: EF/TrigEFPhotonHypo_g10_loose
| Histogram Name | Description | Expectations |
|---|---|---|
| egIsEM Click for image. |
number of candidates that passed loose, medium, and tight cuts | ...................................... |
| Et Click for image. |
transverse energy of Photon | ...................................... |
| Eta Click for image. |
eta position of Photon | ...................................... |
| Phi Click for image. |
phi position of Photon | ...................................... |
| rE37E77 Click for image. |
E237/E277 ,where E237 is uncalibrated energy (sum of cells) of the middle sampling in a rectangle of size 3x7 (in cell units eta X phi), and E277 is uncalibrated energy (sum of cells) of the middle sampling in a rectangle of size 7x7 (in cell units eta X phi). | ...................................... |
| rE33E77 Click for image. |
E233/E277 ,where E233 is uncalibrated energy (sum of cells) of the middle sampling in a rectangle of size 3x3 (in cell units eta X phi), and E277 is uncalibrated energy (sum of cells) of the middle sampling in a rectangle of size 7x7 (in cell units eta X phi). | ...................................... |
Photon: EF/PhotonHypo
| Histogram Name | Description | Expectations | |
|---|---|---|---|
| e10_loose/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e10_medium/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e5_NoCut/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e5_NoCut_FwdBackTrk/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e5_NoCut_IdScan/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e5_NoCut_SiTrk/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e5_NoCut_TRT/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | ...................................... |
Photon: L2/TrigL2EgammaFEX
| Histogram Name | Description | Expectations |
|---|---|---|
| EtavsPhiEgamma Click for image. |
eta position of EM clusters vs phi position | ...................................... |
| EtaEgamma Click for image. |
eta position of EM clusters | ...................................... |
| PhiEgamma Click for image. |
phi position of EM clusters | ...................................... |
| EtEgamma Click for image. |
transverse energy of EM Clusters | ...................................... |
| Had1Et Click for image. |
transverse energy in the first sampling of the hadronic calorimeters behind the cluster | ...................................... |
| Rcore Click for image. |
E237/E277 ,where E237 is uncalibrated energy (sum of cells) of the middle sampling in a rectangle of size 3x7 (in cell units eta X phi), and E277 is uncalibrated energy (sum of cells) of the middle sampling in a rectangle of size 7x7 (in cell units eta X phi) | ...................................... |
| Eratio Click for image. |
fraction difference of EM cluster emaxs1 and e2tsts1, where emaxs1 is the brief energy of strip with maximal energy deposit, e2tsts1 is the energy of the cell corresponding to second energy maximum in the first sampling | ...................................... |
Photon: L2/TrigL2EgammaHypo
| Histogram Name | Description | Expectations | |
|---|---|---|---|
| e10_loose/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e10_medium/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e5_NoCut/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e5_NoCut_FwdBackTrk/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e5_NoCut_IdScan/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e5_NoCut_SiTrk/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | |
| e5_NoCut_TRT/CutCounter Click for image. |
number of candidates passed sets of cuts | ...................................... | ...................................... |
Photon: L2/TrigL2PhotonHypo_g10_loose
| Histogram Name | Description | Expectations |
|---|---|---|
| CutCounter Click for image. |
brief cuts of Photon | ...................................... |
| dEta Click for image. |
difference between the cluster eta (first sampling) and the eta of the track extrapolated to the first sampling: ηstripscluster -ηID, where ηstripscluster is computed in the first sampling of the electromagnetic calorimeter, where the granularity is very fine, and ηID is the pseudo-rapidity of the track extrapolated to the calorimeter | ...................................... |
| dPhi Click for image. |
difference between the cluster phi (second sampling) and the phi of the track extrapolated to the second sampling : φmiddlecluster -φID, where φmiddlecluster is computed in the second compartment of the electromagnetic calorimeter and φID is the azimuth of the track extrapolated to the calorimeter | ...................................... |
| Et_em Click for image. |
transverse energy of EM cluster | ...................................... |
| Et_had Click for image. |
transverse energy in the hadronic calorimeters behind the cluster | ...................................... |
| Rcore Click for image. |
E237/E277 ,where E237 is uncalibrated energy (sum of cells) of the middle sampling in a rectangle of size 3x7 (in cell units eta X phi), and E277 is uncalibrated energy (sum of cells) of the middle sampling in a rectangle of size 7x7 (in cell units eta X phi) | ...................................... |
| Eratio Click for image. |
fraction difference of EM cluster emaxs1 and e2tsts1, where emaxs1 is the brief energy of strip with maximal energy deposit, e2tsts1 is the energy of the cell corresponding to second energy maximum in the first sampling | ...................................... |
| EtaBin Click for image. |
L2 Calo Hypo entries per eta bin | ...................................... |
| F1 Click for image. |
E1/E -- fraction of energy reconstructed in the first sampling with E1 the energy reconstructed in all strips belonging to the cluster and E the total energy reconstructed in the electromagnetic calorimeter clust | ...................................... |
DQ flag description
What to do during your shift?
Topic revision: r4 - 2020-08-31 - TWikiAdminUser
-
Sandbox/SandboxArchive Web
-
Create New Topic
-
Index
-
Search
-
Changes
-
Notifications
-
Statistics
-
Preferences
- ABATBEA
- ACPP
- ADCgroup
- AEGIS
- AfricaMap
- AgileInfrastructure
- ALICE
- AliceEbyE
- AliceSPD
- AliceSSD
- AliceTOF
- AliFemto
- ALPHA
- Altair
- ArdaGrid
- ASACUSA
- AthenaFCalTBAna
- Atlas
- AtlasLBNL
- AXIALPET
- CAE
- CALICE
- CDS
- CENF
- CERNSearch
- CLIC
- Cloud
- CloudServices
- CMS
- Controls
- CTA
- CvmFS
- DB
- DefaultWeb
- DESgroup
- DPHEP
- DM-LHC
- DSSGroup
- EGEE
- EgeePtf
- ELFms
- EMI
- ETICS
- FIOgroup
- FlukaTeam
- Frontier
- Gaudi
- GeneratorServices
- GuidesInfo
- HardwareLabs
- HCC
- HEPIX
- ILCBDSColl
- ILCTPC
- IMWG
- Inspire
- IPv6
- IT
- ItCommTeam
- ITCoord
- ITdeptTechForum
- ITDRP
- ITGT
- ITSDC
- LAr
- LCG
- LCGAAWorkbook
- Leade
- LHCAccess
- LHCAtHome
- LHCb
- LHCgas
- LHCONE
- LHCOPN
- LinuxSupport
- Main
- Medipix
- Messaging
- MPGD
- NA49
- NA61
- NA62
- NTOF
- Openlab
- PDBService
- Persistency
- PESgroup
- Plugins
- PSAccess
- PSBUpgrade
- R2Eproject
- RCTF
- RD42
- RFCond12
- RFLowLevel
- ROXIE
- Sandbox
- SocialActivities
- SPI
- SRMDev
- SSM
- Student
- SuperComputing
- Support
- SwfCatalogue
- TMVA
- TOTEM
- TWiki
- UNOSAT
- Virtualization
- VOBox
- WITCH
- XTCA
 |
|
Copyright &© 2008-2023 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors. or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback