Summer16 Samples:
Spring16 samples (
MiniAODv2):
BACKGROUND reHLT:
Diboson |
generator |
Number of events |
xsec (pb) |
SF |
|
MG5_aMCNLO |
2944584 |
12.05 (LO) |
|
|
MG5_aMCNLO |
15498581 |
3.38 (LO) |
|
|
Powheg |
6638328 |
1.256 (LO) |
|
|
MG5_aMCNLO |
5235265 |
45.85 (LO) |
|
|
MG5_aMCNLO |
25996157 |
5.52 (LO) |
|
|
Powheg |
2000000 |
4.42965 (LO) |
|
|
MG5_aMCNLO |
1654964 |
3.05 (LO) |
|
|
MG5_aMCNLO |
19500618 |
10.96 (LO) |
|
Single top |
generator |
Number of events |
xsec (pb) |
SF |
|
MG5_aMCNLO |
1000000 |
10.32*0.108*3 (NLO) |
|
|
Powheg |
5388717 |
35.6*(1-0.676*0.676) (approx. NNLO) |
|
|
Powheg |
5405726 |
35.6*(1-0.676*0.676) (approx. NNLO) |
|
|
Powheg |
3279200 |
136.02*0.108*3 (NLO) |
|
|
Powheg |
1682400 |
80.95*0.108*3 (NLO) |
|
ttbar |
generator |
Number of events |
xsec (pb) |
SF |
/TTJets_TuneCUETP8M1_13TeV-amcatnloFXFX-pythia8/RunIISpring16MiniAODv2-PUSpring16RAWAODSIM_reHLT_80X_mcRun2_asymptotic_v14-v1/MINIAODSIM |
MG5_aMCNLO |
38261382 |
831.76 (NNLO) |
|
/TT_TuneCUETP8M1_13TeV-powheg-pythia8/RunIISpring16MiniAODv2-PUSpring16RAWAODSIM_reHLT_80X_mcRun2_asymptotic_v14_ext3-v1/MINIAODSIM |
Powheg |
92925926 |
831.76 (NNLO) |
|
W+jets |
generator |
Number of events |
xsec (pb) |
SF |
/WJetsToLNu_TuneCUETP8M1_13TeV-amcatnloFXFX-pythia8/RunIISpring16MiniAODv2-PUSpring16RAWAODSIM_reHLT_80X_mcRun2_asymptotic_v14_ext1-v1/MINIAODSIM |
MG5_aMCNLO |
47502020 |
61526.7 (NNLO) |
|
W+jets HT-binned |
generator |
Number of events |
xsec (pb) |
SF |
|
LO MG5 |
27546978 |
1345 (LO) |
61526.7/50690 = 1.214 |
|
LO MG5 |
14888384 |
359.7 (LO) |
61526.7/50690 = 1.214 |
|
LO MG5 |
1963464 |
48.91 (LO) |
61526.7/50690 = 1.214 |
|
LO MG5 |
3722395 |
12.05 (LO) |
61526.7/50690 = 1.214 |
|
LO MG5 |
6314257 |
5.501 (LO) |
61526.7/50690 = 1.214 |
|
LO MG5 |
246737 |
1.329 (LO) |
61526.7/50690 = 1.214 |
|
LO MG5 |
253561 |
0.03216 (LO) |
61526.7/50690 = 1.214 |
DY+jets |
generator |
Number of events |
xsec (pb) |
SF |
/DYJetsToLL_M-50_TuneCUETP8M1_13TeV-madgraphMLM-pythia8/RunIISpring16MiniAODv2-PUSpring16RAWAODSIM_reHLT_80X_mcRun2_asymptotic_v14_ext1-v1/MINIAODSIM |
MG5_aMCNLO |
91350867 |
6025.2 (NNLO) |
|
BACKGROUND without HLT:
Work Log for H->hh->tautaubb
Q&A
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/Sandbox/HTohhToTauTaubbQA
11/3/2015
reRun.pdf
10/16/2015
lumi594.key
10/9/2015
mass.key
ZPrimeTalk.pdf
10/2/2015
eID_compare.pdf
9/30/2015
trigger3.pdf
9/29/2015
eTurnOn_withEMu.pdf
eleID_ZPrime500.pdf
eleID_ZPrime2000.pdf
eleID_ZPrime5000.pdf
eleTrigTurnOnCurve_ePt_em_barrel.pdf
eleTrigTurnOnCurve_ePt_em_endcap.pdf
9/28/2015
eleTrigTurnOnCurve_ePt_em.pdf
9/25/2015
Electron trigger estimation using ee final state:
eTrigger.pdf
eleID_SUSY160.pdf
eleID_ZPrime500.pdf
eleID_ZPrime2000.pdf
eleID_ZPrime5000.pdf
9/16/2015
13TeV_et_ZPrime.pdf
13TeV_em_ZPrime.pdf
9/15/2015
tables.pdf
9/14/2015
13TeV_em.pdf
13TeV_et.pdf
13TeV_mt.pdf
13TeV_tt.pdf
tauTrigTurnOnCurve_tPt_et.pdf,
tauTrigTurnOnCurve_tPt_et_1p5To3.pdf,
tauTrigTurnOnCurve_tPt_et_3To5.pdf
tauTrigTurnOnCurve_tPt_mt.pdf,
tauTrigTurnOnCurve_tPt_mt_1p5To3.pdf,
tauTrigTurnOnCurve_tPt_mt_3To5.pdf
tauTrigTurnOnCurve_tPt_et_5To10.pdf,
tauTrigTurnOnCurve_tPt_et_10.pdf
tauTrigTurnOnCurve_tPt_mt_5To10.pdf,
tauTrigTurnOnCurve_tPt_mt_10.pdf
9/9/2015
tauTrigTurnOnCurve_tPt_mt.pdf
tauTrigTurnOnCurve_tPt_et.pdf
8/20/2015
25ns vs 50ns
compare_DY_et.pdf,
compare_DY_em.pdf,
compare_DY_mt.pdf,
compare_WJets_et.pdf,
compare_WJets_em.pdf,
compare_WJets_mt.pdf
compare_TTJets_et.pdf,
compare_TTJets_em.pdf,
compare_TTJets_mt.pdf
7/12/2015
ZtoTauTau.pdf
ZtoTauTau1.1.pdf
ZtoTauTau_4ZPrime.pdf
7/11/2015
tauTrigTurnOnCurve.pdf
7/10/2015
13TeV_em.pdf
13TeV_et.pdf
13TeV_mt.pdf
13TeV_tt.pdf
7/7/2015
13TeV_em.pdf
13TeV_mt.pdf
13TeV_tt.pdf
7/5/2015
13TeV_tt.pdf
genmet.pdf
pfmet.pdf
taus.pdf
taufit.pdf
7/28/2015
fit.pdf
frame_H300_1.pdf
H300_2.pdf
H300_1.pdf
7/17/2015
fMass_vis_350_DY_Embed_.pdf,
fMass_vis_350_DY_MC_.pdf
fMass_withMEt_350_DY_Embed_.pdf,
fMass_withMEt_350_DY_MC_.pdf
fMass_withNu_350_DY_Embed_.pdf,
fMass_withNu_350_DY_MC_.pdf
where:
fMass_withSVFit_350_DY_Embed_.pdf,
fMass_withSVFit_350_DY_MC_.pdf
6/18/2015
13TeVSensetivity.pdf
TTJet_OSTight_comparison.pdf
DY_OSTight_comparison.pdf
6/17/2015
ttYields.pdf
6/16/2015
TTJet_comparison.pdf
6/15/2015
tauTrigStudy.pdf
6/9/2015
higgsPtRange_0_99999_mH300.pdf
6/8/2015
higgsPtRange_0_99999.pdf
higgsPtRangeBin50.zip
higgsPtRangeBin20.zip
higgsPtRangeBin10.zip
6/5/2015
higgsPtRanges.zip
5/20/2015
L1Trig1.2.pdf
5/19/2015
L1Trig1.1.pdf
5/18/2015
L1Trig.pdf
5/11/2015
trigRate.pdf
trigRateTau.pdf
rates.txt
trigRateClean.pdf
trigRateExtraJet.pdf
trigRateClean_015.pdf
trigRate_015.pdf
trigRateExtraJet_015.pdf
5/5/2015
tau_35.pdf
tau_30.pdf
5/4/2015
patJetPt.pdf
evtDump_patJets.txt
l1TauPt_zoom.pdf
8TeV_SM_h2tautau_30.pdf
8TeV_SM_h2tautau_45.pdf
taujet.txt
5/1/2015
8TeV.pdf
jetPt2.pdf
evtDump.txt
4/29/2015
l1TauPt.pdf
jetPt.pdf
4/27/2015
tauPt_2.pdf
4/24/2015
tauPt_2.pdf
4/22/2015
tauPt.pdf
4/21/2015
l1vspat.pdf
4/17/2015
2tag.pdf
4/16/2015
012.zip
4/15/2015
012.txt
scale_tau_pt_01.pdf
scale_jet_pt_01.pdf
ttbarNorm_012.pdf
4/14/2015
tauPtVariations.zip
0and1tag_pullsTable.pdf
4/9/2015
0Tag_fits.zip
01tag_fits.zip
4/2/2015
0and1tag.pdf
3/18/2015
AN_materials_Mar18.zip
3/17/2015
binning_0.1_25.txt
3/13/2015
compareBinning.txt
binningPlots.zip
tt_ggHTohh-limit_unblind_0.05_25.txt
tt_ggHTohh-limit_unblind_0.05_20.txt
3/12/2015
binning_0.05_20.txt,
binning_0.05_25.txt
binning_0.1_20.txt,
binning_0.1_25.txt
3/11/2015
limit_0.05.txt
limit_ceiling.txt
3/9/2015
cutbased_default.txt
tt_ggHTohh-limit_cutBased.txt
tt_ggHTohh-limit_BDT.txt
3/6/2015
Default_Limits.txt
INFNVSBrown_limit.pdf
3/5/2015
tt_ggHTohh-limit_12.txt
tt_ggHTohh-limit_012.txt
2/24/2015
Feb24_AN_material.zip
2/17/2015
normalizationSystematics_massWindow.txt
normalizationSystematics.txt
2/13/2015
bSys_Systematics.txt
bSys_Systematics_massWindow.txt
ZTT_Systematic.txt
ZTT_Systematic_massWindow.txt
2/12/2015
BDT-Checks2.zip
2/11/2015
BDT-Checks.zip
2/9/2015
mlfit_el_br_300.txt
mlfit_el_it_300.txt
mlfit_rl.txt
2/4/2015
comparison_BDT350_scale_t.pdf
limit_automatic.pdf
limit_automatic.txt
bins_automatic.txt
2/2/2015
comparison_fMassKinFit_Brown_pt_vs_Brown_iso.pdf
comparison_fMassKinFit_Brown_iso_vs_Brown_region.pdf
ZTT_yield.txt
1/27/2015
Limit comparison:
1) cut based vs BDT (blinded):
limit-cutBasedVSBDT-blind.pdf
2) cut based vs BDT (unblinded):
limit-cutBasedVSBDT-unblind.pdf
3) BDT (blinded) vs BDT (unblinded):
limit-BDT-blindVSBDT-unblind.pdf
1/26/2015
comparison_Category_scale_btag_8TeV.pdf
comparison_fMassKinFit_scale_t_Jan26.pdf,
comparison_fMassKinFit_scale_j_Jan26.pdf,
comparison_fMassKinFit_scale_btag_Jan26.pdf,
limit_comparison_br_it_012_Jan26.txt
1/25/2015
comparison_pt1_scale_t.pdf
comparison_CSVJ1Pt_scale_j_8TeV.pdf
1/23/2015
http://www.hep.wisc.edu/~elaird/12_bdt_templates/v1/
BDT_ggHTohh-limit.pdf
1/22/2015
lim_cb_012.txt,
lim_cb_12.txt
IT-limits.txt
1/13/2015
BDT_1.0_DY_Embed_H350.pdf
1/12/2015
svMass__1.0_DYttLep_method1.pdf:
shape from 1M or 2M
svMass__1.0_DYttLep_method2.pdf:
shape from 1L or 2L
svMass__1.0_DYttLep_method3.pdf:
shape from 1M or 2M
1/9/2015
svMass__1.0_DY_MC.pdf
svMass__1.0_DY_Embed.pdf
svMass__1.0_DYttLep_method1.pdf:
svMass__1.0_DYttLep_method2.pdf:
DYttlepEstimate.txt
1/8/2015
comparison_fMassKinFit_scale_t-1.pdf
limit_comparison.txt
DY_estimation.txt
svMass_2015.1.8.pdf
1/5/2015
differences.pdf
12/19/2014
qcd_likelihoods.txt
qcd_slides.pdf
L2M_fit.pdf,
L2M_arithmetic.pdf
R2T_fit.pdf
QCD_fit1.pdf,
QCD_fit2.pdf
QCD_arithmetic2.pdf
12/17/2014
QCD_estimations.txt
comparison_Italians_Brown_QCD_norm_from_OS_L_to_M.pdf
tauTau_2jet1tag_prefit_8TeV_LIN.pdf
tauTau_2jet2tag_prefit_8TeV_LIN.pdf
12/15/2014
comparison_BrownNew_windows.pdf,
comparison_BrownOld_BrownNewAfterWindows.pdf
comparison_BrownOld_BrownNewBeforeWindows.pdf
comparison_Italians_Brown_with_embedded.pdf
12/11/2014
Status update:
1) QCD: We have been tracking down the differences in even selection and have reduced the difference in Same Sign Relaxed Data Sample from ~10% to ~1%
dataC_difference_Before.pdf,
dataC_difference_Now.pdf
2) Embedde DY:
EmbeddedSample.pdf
12/8/2014
scaleFactorCompare2.pdf
svMass_4.pdf
12/7/2014
svMass control mass with INFN QCD estimation method:
svMass_2.pdf
scaleFactorCompare.pdf
12/5/2014
svMass__1.0.pdf
BDT_260_1.5.pdf,
BDT_300_1.5.pdf,
BDT_350_1.5.pdf,
BDT_1.5.zip
BDT_260_1.0.pdf,
BDT_300_1.0.pdf,
BDT_350_1.0.pdf,
BDT_1.0.zip
12/3/2014
260_fMassKinFit_scale_t.pdf,
260_svMass_scale_t.pdf
300_fMassKinFit_scale_t.pdf,
300_svMass_scale_t.pdf
350_fMassKinFit_scale_t.pdf,
350_svMass_scale_t.pdf
INFN old_vs_new_fMassKinFit_scale_t.pdf
tauTau_2jet1tag_prefit_8TeV_LIN.pdf,
tauTau_2jet1tag_prefit_8TeV_LIN_2xQCD.pdf
tauTau_2jet2tag_prefit_8TeV_LIN.pdf,
tauTau_2jet2tag_prefit_8TeV_LIN_2xQCD.pdf
12/2/2014
1tag_svMass_scale_t.pdf,
1tag_svMass_scale_j.pdf
2tag_svMass_scale_t.pdf,
2tag_svMass_scale_j.pdf
1tag_fMassKinFit_scale_t.pdf,
1tag_fMassKinFit_scale_j.pdf
2tag_fMassKinFit_scale_t.pdf,
2tag_fMassKinFit_scale_j.pdf
comparison_svMass_scale_t_qcd1.5-10.pdf,
comparison_svMass_scale_t_qcd3.0-10.pdf
comparison_fMassKinFit_scale_t_qcd1.5-10.pdf,
comparison_fMassKinFit_scale_t_qcd3.0-10.pdf
11/27/2014
scaleFactor_INFN.txt
scaleFactors2.txt
ControlPlots2.pdf
11/26/2014
ControlPlots.pdf
scaleFactor.txt
comparison_fMassKinFit-1.pdf
comparison_svMass-1.pdf
11/25/2014
fits.txt
comparison_fMassKinFit.pdf
comparison_svMass.pdf
http://www.hep.wisc.edu/~elaird/11_kinfit_version_compare/take2/
1M1NonM.zip,
2M.zip
11/24/2014
svMass_1MbTag_H350_inclusive.pdf
comparison_brokenDY.pdf
comparison_inclusiveDY.pdf
dy.pdf
11/23/2014
QCD_ControlPlots_1M.zip,
QCD_ControlPlots_1M1Non1M.zip,
QCD_ControlPlots_2M.zip
11/21/2014
table18.txt
svMass_1MbTag_H350.pdf
BDT_both_1MbTag_H350.pdf
slides:
https://indico.cern.ch/event/349611/#2014-11-21
11/20/2014
overtrainingChecks.zip
table17.txt
svMass_iso1.5.pdf
fMassKinFit_iso1.5.pdf
11/19/2014
table16.txt
11/18/2014
table15.txt
yields.txt
trigger_140.pdf
11/17/2014
tt_limit_mass_windows.pdf
tauTau_2jet1tag_prefit_8TeV_LIN-1.pdf
tauTau_2jet2tag_prefit_8TeV_LIN-1.pdf
trigger.pdf
BDT.zip
11/14/2014
PlotsDiff_H2hh2tautaubb_H300_Brown_INFN.pdf
yield_table_v1.txt
11/13/2014
triggerEff_new.pdf,
triggerEff_old.pdf
triggerEff_new_cut.pdf,
triggerEff_old_cut.pdf
yield_summary_3rdLeptVeto_newTrigWeight.txt,
yield_summary_no3rdLeptVeto_newTrigWeight.txt,
yield_summary_no3rdLeptVeto_oldTrigWeight.txt
11/11/2014
simple_summary.txt
table10.txt
11/7/2014
Z. Mao, Brown University, HH->bb+tauhtauh with MVA
11/6/2014
slides_11_6.pdf
chi2Corr.pdf
bdtCheckPlots.pdf
11/5/2014
table7.txt
chi2KinFit2_fMassKinFit.pdf
chi2KinFit2_related.pdf
BDT_Eff_newKinFit.pdf
H2hh350_corrMatrix_bkg.pdf
H2hh350_corrMatrix_sig.pdf
11/4/2014
table4.txt
corrMatrix_kinFitGreater200.pdf
BDT_Eff_11_4.pdf
corrMatrix_kinFitGreater200_newKinFit.pdf
table2_oldKinFit_noChi2Cut.txt
11/3/2014
corrMatrix.pdf
10/31/2014
Sync plots with correct trigger match:
PlotsDiff_H2hh2bbtautau_H300_Brown_INFN_newTrigger.pdf
BDT effeciency plot:
BDT_Eff_diff_combined_10.31.pdf
limit_table.txt
chi2.pdf
kinfit_v1.0.pdf
10/30/2014
BDT_Eff_diff_combined_8.pdf
10/29/2014
BDT variable compare with chi2 range fixed:
BDT_Eff_diff_combined_chi2RangeFix.pdf
ranking.pdf
slides_10.29.pdf
10/28/2014
BDT variable compare:
BDT_Eff_diff_combined_mvaMetFix.pdf
9/15/2014
syst_update.txt
9/12/2014
New tau ID vs old tau ID:
PlotsDiff_H2hh2tautau_H300_BrownOldID_BrownNewID.pdf
9/11/2014
New tau id, mainly againstEleMVA3 -> againstEleMVA5:
PlotsDiff_H2hh2tautau_H300_Brown_BrownOld.pdf
9/4/2014
BDT_Eff_diff_combined2.pdf, [[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/Sandbox/ZaixingSandbox/byIsolationMVA2raw_1_bTag_all.pdf]
[byIsolationMVA2raw_1_bTag_all.pdf]],
byIsolationMVA2raw_2_bTag_all.pdf,
BDT_Eff_diff_combined4.pdf
9/2/2014
check2.pdf
8/29/2014
BDT_Eff_diff_combined.pdf,
varsRank.zip,
varsRank.txt
check.pdf
8/28/2014
BDT_Eff_combined.pdf
8/27/2014
BDT Variables Comparison:
BDT_Eff_diff_260.pdf,
BDT_Eff_diff_300.pdf,
BDT_Eff_diff_350.pdf
8/20/2014
fit_xs.txt,
slides2.pdf,
fit_xs.pdf
H2hh2tautaubb5.1.pdf
8/19/2014
BDT vs svMass and mJJ:
2D_plot.pdf
8/15/2014
Check Sync:
checkSync.pdf,
checkSync2.pdf
8/14/2014
bins.txt
slides1.pdf
8/13/2014
Plots for comparing QCD/Data in OS relaxed region:
BDT_checkForQCDData.pdf
8/7/2014
Comparison Plots (noBtag):
svMass_all_IsoCompare.pdf
8/6/2014
Comparison Plots:
svMass_bTag_IsoCompare.pdf,
svMass_bTag_OSCompare.pdf
Variables used for BDT training:
SSTight_BDTTrainingVars.zip
8/5/2014
Isolation range comparison:
svMass_IsoCompare.pdf
SSTight.zip
slides.pdf
7/31/2014
H2hh2tautaubb4.1.pdf
H2hh2tautaubb4.2.pdf
7/30/2014
H2hh2tautaubb4.pdf
higgs tool:
tauTau_2jet2tag_prefit_8TeV_LIN.pdf,
tt_limit.pdf,
tt_bestfit.pdf
7/29/2014
1) sync without Met smearing:
PlotsDiff_tautau_GGH_Brown_INFN_noSmearing.pdf
7/24/2014
1) Update KS Test with better checks:
KS_LL_withCheck2.zip
7/22/2014
1) Update
ChiSquare Test with correct error bars:
XS_LL_fix.zip
2) Update KS Test with check:
KS_LL_withCheck.zip
7/17/2014
1) Compare tau pairs:
BDT_onePair.pdf,
BDT_multiplePairs.pdf
7/14/2014
1) Chi Square Test :
ChiSquare.zip
2) KS Test (10000 bins):
KS.zip
3) Chi Square Test (iso 1.5):
ChiSquare_1.5.zip
4) KS Test (10000 bins, iso 1.5):
KS_LL_1.5.zip
7/9/2014
1) Relax = iso > 3 with rejected events:
LL:
BDT_both_bTag_LL_iso3_update.pdf,
iso1_bTag_LL.pdf,
iso2_bTag_LL.pdf
LT:
BDT_both_bTag_LT_iso3_update.pdf,
iso1_bTag_LT.pdf,
iso2_bTag_LT.pdf
TL:
BDT_both_bTag_TL_iso3_update.pdf,
iso1_bTag_TL.pdf,
iso2_bTag_TL.pdf
7/7/2014
1) Improved scaling and angle range:
LL.zip,
LT.zip,
TL.zip
2) Relax now defined as iso > 3:
BDT_both_bTag_LL_iso3.pdf,
BDT_both_bTag_LT_iso3.pdf,
BDT_both_bTag_TL_iso3.pdf
7/3/2014
1) Iso Selection:
IsoSelect.zip
2) QCD:
QCD_MC.zip
3) systematics:
syst.txt
7/2/2014
Only consider leg1 or leg2 for tau pt binning:
leg1:
pt1_binned.pdf,
pt1_binned_1.pdf,
pt1_binned_2.pdf,
pt1_binned_3.pdf
leg2:
pt2_binned.pdf
6/30/2014
For each tau bin in 3 pt regions R1:(45,70), R2:(70,120), R3:(120,+)
Separate events in 6 catagories: R1+R1, R2+R1, R2+R2, R3+R1, R3+R2, R3+R3
(1) Relaxed region = 1 or more tauIso > 1.5:
ptRange_bTag_1.pdf,
plots_1.zip
(2) Relaxed region = 2 tauIso > 1.5:
ptRange_bTag_2.pdf,
plots_2.zip
SyncNtuple:
PlotsDiff_tautau_GGH_Brown_new_INFN_3.pdf
patMET:
PlotsDiff_tautau_GGH_Brown_rawMET_INFN.pdf
6/18/2014
Bin pt in 3 regions instead of preforming a fit:
1) Data:
pt1_bTag_noFit.pdf,
tightPt_bTag_noFit.pdf,
relaxPt_bTag_noFit.pdf
2) QCD MC:
QCDratio_pt1_noFit.pdf,
QCDratio_tightPt_noFit.pdf,
QCDratio_relaxPt_noFit.pdf
6/16/2014
QCD MC gen-matching:
genMatch_QCDtotal_0_80.txt,
genMatch_QCDtotal_80_140.txt,
genMatch_QCDtotal_140.txt
6/13/2014
Location for combined root file for limit calculation: /scratch/zmao/relaxed_regression3/combined.root
6/12/2014
Scaling MC pt:
1)
pt1_bTag_ScaleMC_0.950.pdf,
tightPt_bTag_ScaleMC_0.950.pdf,
relaxPt_bTag_ScaleMC_0.950.pdf
2)
pt1_bTag_ScaleMC_1.050.pdf,
tightPt_bTag_ScaleMC_1.050.pdf,
relaxPt_bTag_ScaleMC_1.050.pdf
3)
pt1_bTag_ScaleMC_1.500.pdf,
tightPt_bTag_ScaleMC_1.500.pdf,
relaxPt_bTag_ScaleMC_1.500.pdf
4)
pt1_bTag_ScaleMC_0.500.pdf,
tightPt_bTag_ScaleMC_0.500.pdf,
relaxPt_bTag_ScaleMC_0.500.pdf
QCD:
QCDratio_1_relaxPt.pdf,
QCDratio_False_tightPt.pdf
6/11/2014
With 2 loose b tag:
1) tau 1 -- kOneProng0PiZero: pt1_loose_1_0.pdf
2) tau 1 -- kOneProng1PiZero: pt1_loose_1_1.pdf
3) tau 1 -- kThreeProng0PiZero: pt1_loose_1_10.pdf
One iso < 1.5 the other iso > 1.5:
tightPt_loose_bTag.pdf,
relaxPt_loose_bTag.pdf
Both iso > 1.5:
tightPt_loose_bTag_relax.pdf,
relaxPt_loose_bTag_relax.pdf
Both iso > 1.5 with b tag:
tightPt_bTag.pdf,
relaxPt_bTag.pdf
6/10/2014
pt1 update with WZjetsto2l2q:
pt1_bTag_update.pdf
HadronicTauDecayModes: kNull = -1 |
|
kOneProng0PiZero |
|
kOneProng1PiZero |
|
kOneProng2PiZero |
|
kOneProng3PiZero |
|
kOneProngNPiZero |
|
kTwoProng0PiZero |
|
kTwoProng1PiZero |
|
kTwoProng2PiZero |
|
kTwoProng3PiZero |
|
kTwoProngNPiZero |
|
kThreeProng0PiZero |
|
kThreeProng1PiZero |
|
kThreeProng2PiZero |
|
kThreeProng3PiZero |
|
kThreeProngNPiZero |
|
kRareDecayMode |
|
1) tau 1 -- kOneProng0PiZero: pt1_1_0.pdf
2) tau 1 -- kOneProng1PiZero: pt1_1_1.pdf
3) tau 1 -- kThreeProng0PiZero: pt1_1_10.pdf
6/9/2014
QCD plot from QCD samples with at least one leg iso > 1.5 and preselection:
6/6/2014
- sync ntuple made with preselections:
1) taus: pt > 45, |eta| < 2.1, hadronic, e/mu veto, iso < 1.5, opposite sign
2) jets: leading 2 CSV jets, pt > 20, |eta| < 2.4
/afs/cern.ch/user/z/zmao/public/HTohhSync (
Still missing variables ...)
6/2/2014
MC Validation:
LTauMCValidation_ele.pdf,
LTauMCValidation_mu.pdf
pt bin:
pt1_update.pdf
5/30/2014
pt binned in pt1 and pt2, added
DY1Jets:
pt1_bTag_9.pdf
MC Validation:
LTauMCValidation_phi.pdf
5/20/2014
pt binned in:
1) pt1 (0, 120, 180 +):
pt1_bin.pdf
2) pt2 (0, 80, 120 +):
pt2_bin.pdf
3) pt1 + pt2 (0, 120, 200+):
pt1pt2_bin.pdf
results in BDT distribution:
1) pt1:
BDT_both_bTag_pt1.pdf
2) pt2:
BDT_both_bTag_pt2.pdf
3) pt1 + pt2:
BDT_both_bTag_pt1pt2.pdf
MC Validation:
LTauMCValidation.pdf
5/19/2014
Updates on comparison between different iso regions:
1) BDT distribution:
BDT_both_bTag_IsoRatio_new.pdf
2) pt1 distribution:
pt1_bTag_IsoRatio_new.pdf
Pt binned fit: 3 bins, (0, 120, 180+)
pt1_ptBin.pdf
5/16/2014
prelim slides:
Prelim1.1.pdf
5/15/2014
1) BDT Efficiency with different amount of variables for training:
BDT_Eff_diff.pdf
5/14/2014
1) BDT value comparison between 1.5<iso<4 and 4<iso<10:
BDT_EWK_bTag_IsoRatio.pdf,
BDT_QCD_bTag_IsoRatio.pdf,
BDT_both_bTag_IsoRatio.pdf
2) Prolems in previous mTauTau plots with met consideration: solved bug with using -phi istead of 3.14 + pi.
But most importantly, the high mass tail is likely due to events where the met is in the opposite direction of the taus. Since the taus are boosted, the combination of the tau and opposite met gives the 'true' tau a large invariant mass. To deal with this, the follow plot has been made so that it only accounted for events where the met is in the same direction as the tau. If the met was in the opposite direction, the visible tau components were used for 'true' tau.
TMVARegApp_H2hh350_all_new_isobTag_new.pdf
5/14/2014
1) BDT Efficiency with 2D cut update:
BDT_Eff_2.0.pdf
2) Slides update:
H2hh2tautaubb3.5.pdf
5/13/2014
1) BDT Efficiency with 2D cut:
BDT_Eff_new.pdf
2) Plots update with better QCD prediction:
BDT2D_new.pdf
3) Slides for Thursday:
H2hh2tautaubb3.4.pdf
5/12/2014
1) diTau mass with regression:
nuOn2Tau.pdf
2) updated 2d BDT plot:
BDT2D_bTag_new.pdf
3) BDT training with one combined sample:
BDT_both_bTag.pdf
4) BDT Rejection Efficiency:
BDT_Eff_bTag.pdf
5/10/2014
BDT training with QCD and MC separatly:
1) BDT_MC:
BDT_EWK_bTag.pdf
2) BDT_QCD:
BDT_QCD_bTag.pdf
3) BDT_2D:
BDT2D_bTag.pdf
5/9/2014
met with jet regression:
1) signal H350:
TMVARegApp_H2hh350_all_new_isobTag_reg.pdf
2) tt:
TMVARegApp_tt_eff_all_new_isobTag_reg.pdf
5/8/2014
BDT results:
1) method I:
BDT_bTag_m1.pdf
2) method II:
BDT_bTag_m2.pdf
gen jets are clustered using anti-kT algorithem with R = 0.5
process.patOverloadedJets = cms.EDProducer('PATJetOverloader',
src = cms.InputTag(jets),
genJets = cms.InputTag("ak5GenJets")
)
5/7/2014
H2hh2tautaubb3.1.pdf
H2hh2tautaubb3.3.pdf
5/5/2014
QCD translation using all 3 histograms from control regions:
J1Pt_bTag.pdf,
J2Pt_bTag.pdf
H2hh2tautaubb3.pdf
5/1/2014
b jet regression on signal and background:
1) mH260:
mJJ_bTag_mH260.pdf,
mJJReg_bTag_mH260.pdf
2) mH300:
mJJ_bTag_mH300.pdf,
mJJReg_bTag_mH300.pdf
3) mH350:
mJJ_bTag_mH350.pdf,
mJJReg_bTag_mH350.pdf
4/30/2014
1) fixed data count and error bar problem:
fixedDataCount.zip
2) added scale factor for MC:
scale4MC.zip
there are still problems as the fitted scale factor for MC almost always reach the limit (0.9 or 1.1)
4/25/2014
bTag_withPrediction.zip
Imporved regression result after changing variables' default value from -99 to 0:
1)
TMVARegApp_H2hh350_improvedVarRange.pdf
2) explored changes when trained with only events in signal region:
TMVARegApp_H2hh350__improvedVarRange_onlySignalRegion.pdf
3) matched to b jet:
TMVARegApp_H2hh350_bMatch.pdf
4) matched to b jet and exclude events without 2 matched gen b jets:
TMVARegApp_H2hh350_forcedBMatch.pdf
4/23/2014
bTag plots with :
bTag_new.zip
Regression applied on un-trained events:
1) with out JECUnc:
TMVARegApp_H2hh350_old_both_iso_reg.pdf
2) with JECUnc:
TMVARegApp_H2hh350_new_both_iso_reg.pdf
3) with JECUnc and b-tag:
TMVARegApp_H2hh350_all_1_both_isobTag_reg.pdf
4/22/2014
Regression Training with H2hh260, H2hh300, H2hh350 sample:
Requirements: iso <1.5 on both tau candidates
1)
TMVARegApp_H2hh350_new_all_both_iso_reg.pdf
2) require b-tag:
TMVARegApp_H2hh350_new_all_both_isobTag_reg.pdf
3) require no soft leptons in both jets:
TMVARegApp_H2hh350_new_all_both_softLept0iso_reg.pdf
4) require 1 jet containing soft lepton:
TMVARegApp_H2hh350_new_all_both_softLept1iso_reg.pdf
5) require 2 jets containing soft lepton:
TMVARegApp_H2hh350_new_all_both_softLept2iso_reg.pdf
4/21/2014
Regression Training with H2hh350 sample:
1) Trained with leading CSV jet:
TMVARegApp_H2hh260_all_J1_reg.pdf,
TMVARegApp_H2hh300_all_J1_reg.pdf,
TMVARegApp_H2hh350_all_J1_reg.pdf
2) Trained with second leading CSV jet:
TMVARegApp_H2hh260_all_J2_reg.pdf,
TMVARegApp_H2hh300_all_J2_reg.pdf,
TMVARegApp_H2hh350_all_J2_reg.pdf
3) Trained with both jets:
TMVARegApp_H2hh260_all_both_reg.pdf,
TMVARegApp_H2hh300_all_both_reg.pdf,
TMVARegApp_H2hh350_all_both_reg.pdf
4/15/2014
bTag plots:
bTag.zip
revert bTag plots:
revert_bTag.zip
4/14/2014
Iso comparison:
1) iso1:
iso1_combined_OS_allIso.pdf,
iso1_combined_SS_allIso.pdf
2) iso2:
iso2_combined_OS_allIso.pdf,
iso2_combined_SS_allIso.pdf
mJJ distribution with data:
1) Opposite Sign:
mJJ_combined_OS_allIso.pdf,
mJJ_combined_OS_tight.pdf,
mJJ_combined_OS_relaxed.pdf
2) Same Sign:
mJJ_combined_SS_allIso.pdf,
mJJ_combined_SS_tight.pdf,
mJJ_combined_SS_relaxed.pdf
dPhi met tauPair:
1) same sign:
dPhiMet_TauPair_combined_SS_relaxed.pdf,
dPhiMet_TauPair_combined_SS_tight.pdf
4/11/2014
Iso comparison:
1) mJJ:
mJJ_combined_SS_tight.pdf,
mJJ_combined_SS_relaxed.pdf
2) svMass:
svMass_combined_SS_tight.pdf,
svMass_combined_SS_relaxed.pdf
3) pt1:
pt1_combined_SS_tight.pdf,
pt1_combined_SS_relaxed.pdf
4/7/2014
dPhi between Met and jets, taus and BDT training vars rank (trainned with H2hh350):
1) variable rank:
BDT350.txt
2) dPhi between
taus:
dPhiMet_Tau1_combined_OS_tight.pdf,
dPhiMet_Tau2_combined_OS_tight.pdf,
dPhiMet_TauPair_combined_OS_tight.pdf,
dPhiMet_SVTauPair_combined_OS_tight.pdf
jets:
dPhiMet_Jet1_combined_OS_tight.pdf,
dPhiMet_Jet2_combined_OS_tight.pdf,
dPhiMet_JetPair_combined_OS_tight.pdf
4/6/2014
dPhi between Met and jets, taus: (Signal events have been increased by x100)
1) Same sign:
- jets:
dPhiMet_Jet1_combined_SS.pdf,
dPhiMet_Jet2_combined_SS.pdf,
dPhiMet_JetPair_combined_SS.pdf
- taus:
dPhiMet_Tau1_combined_SS.pdf,
dPhiMet_Tau2_combined_SS.pdf,
dPhiMet_TauPair_combined_SS.pdf
1) Opposite sign:
- jets:
dPhiMet_Jet1_combined_OS.pdf,
dPhiMet_Jet2_combined_OS.pdf,
dPhiMet_JetPair_combined_OS.pdf
- taus:
dPhiMet_Tau1_combined_OS.pdf,
dPhiMet_Tau2_combined_OS.pdf,
dPhiMet_TauPair_combined_OS.pdf
4/3/2014
H2hh2tautaubb2.5.pdf
3/31/2014
Added more samples including
DYJetsToLL and
W2JetsToLNu:
data_mJJ_btag-2.pdf,
data_ptJJ_btag-2.pdf,
data_svMass_btag-2.pdf,
data_pt1_btag-2.pdf,
data_pt2_btag-2.pdf
3/27/2014
1) CSV values for 2 jets:
data_CSVJ1.pdf,
data_CSVJ2.pdf
2) CSV values for 2 jets with 1 medium and 1 loose b-tag:
data_CSVJ1_btag.pdf,
data_CSVJ2_btag.pdf
3) mJJ and ptJJ with 1 medium and 1 loose b-tag:
data_mJJ_btag.pdf,
data_ptJJ_btag.pdf
4) svMass with 1 medium and 1 loose b-tag:
data_svMass_btag.pdf
5) pt and eta of the 2 tau candidates with 1 medium and 1 loose b-tag:
data_pt1_btag.pdf,
data_pt2_btag.pdf,
data_eta1_btag.pdf,
data_eta2_btag.pdf
3/26/2014
Same sign events study:
QCD background table:
QCD.txt
Data sample with tt, tt-semi and ZZ:
data_svMass.pdf,
data_mJJ.pdf
3/22/2014
Gen match plots:
1) dR distribution for H350:
chargeSignVSGenBdR_H350_all.pdf,
chargeSignVSGenTaudR_H350_all.pdf,
chargeSignVSGenedR_H350_all.pdf,
chargeSignVSGenmudR_H350_all.pdf
2) dR distribution for tt (full leptonic):
chargeSignVSGenBdR_tt_all.pdf,
chargeSignVSGenTaudR_tt_all.pdf,
chargeSignVSGenedR_tt_all.pdf,
chargeSignVSGenmudR_tt_all.pdf
3) dR distribution for tt (semi leptonic):
chargeSignVSGenBdR_tt-semi_all.pdf,
chargeSignVSGenTaudR_tt-semi_all.pdf,
chargeSignVSGenedR_tt-semi_all.pdf,
chargeSignVSGenmudR_tt-semi_all.pdf
Gen match tables using closest matched gen particle, for e, mu, tau dR<02, for b dR<0.5:
e(tau) indicates the second closest marched gen particle is a tau and dR<0.2 so the electron is likely to come from a tau decay.
e(b) indicates the second closest marched gen particle is a b and dR<0.5 so the electron is likely to come from a b decay.
'sum' row is the sum of all catagories and can be compared with the 'total' row to double check if the catagories's been well defined.
1) H350:
genMatch_H2hh350_all.txt
2) tt (full leptonic):
genMatch_tt_all.txt
3) tt (semi leptonic):
genMatch_tt_semi_all.txt
1/27/2014
svEta plot with error bar:
svEta_no_b_tag.pdf
1/23/2014
TMVA training with Fisher and BDT methods:
1) input variables:
variables_id_c1.pdf,
variables_id_c2.pdf,
variables_id_c3.pdf
2) classifier output:
overtrain_Fisher.pdf,
overtrain_BDT.pdf
3) classifier background rejection vs signal efficiency (ROC curve):
rejBvsS.pdf
1/17/2014
Pt distribution of reco tautau with matching gen Higgs.
genHiggsPtvsTauTauPt.pdf
1/16/2014
Full mass plots using Markov Chain SV Fit.
mH_all.eps.pdf
mH_all_svFit.eps.pdf
mH_all_mix.eps.pdf
12/16/2013
Skimming:
#
DoubleTau
tau30JetSelector = cms.EDFilter("PFTauSelector", src=cms.InputTag("hpsPFTauProducer"), cut=cms.string("abs(eta) < 2.3 & pt > 30.0"),
discriminators=cms.VPSet( cms.PSet(discriminator=cms.InputTag("hpsPFTauDiscriminationByDecayModeFinding"),selectionCut=cms.double(0.5)), ), filter=cms.bool(False) )
twoTaus = cms.EDFilter("CandViewCountFilter", src=cms.InputTag("tau30JetSelector"), minNumber=cms.uint32(2))
doubleTauPath = cms.Path(atLeastOneGoodVertexSequence + tau30JetSelector + twoTaus)
skimConfig.paths.append("doubleTauPath")
When using
NSVFitStandalone, should we call: integrateMarkovChain() or integrateVEGAS()?
Full mass calculated by:
- tauTauCandP4 = (fullPt, fullEta, fullPhi, SVFitMass)
- J1 = CSV >= 0.679, pt > 20, |eta| < 2.4
- J2 = CSV >= 0.244, pt > 20, |eta| < 2.4
mH_SVFitMass.pdf
12/13/2013
Full mass visible:
fullMass_visible.pdf
Full mass with SVFit:
fullMass_SVfit.pdf
dR between tautau and jj:
dRTauTauJJ.pdf
12/9/2013
mTauTau plots remade with SVFit mass:
mTauTau_no_b_tag_SVFitMass.pdf,
mTauTau_2_b_tag_SVFitMass.pdf
2DMass_signal_no_b_tag.pdf,
2DMass_signal_2_b_tag.pdf
2DMass_tt_no_b_tag.pdf,
2DMass_tt_2_b_tag.pdf
12/6/2013
Implimented SVFit for two hadronic tau legs (only svMass working now and svPt only gives 0).
Rerun ntuple mass production.
Met info plots:
Mets.pdf
Plots remade with higher statistics.
12/5/2013
Cut flow plot with iso < 1.5:
CutFlow.pdf
Discriminator:
ByMediumCombinedIsolationDBSumPtCorr3Hits can be accessed by variable byMediumCombinedIsolationDeltaBetaCorr3Hits.
Which is really just byCombinedIsolationDeltaBetaCorrRaw3Hits < 1 as shown:
Iso.pdf.
The variable is now stored in the ntuple as:
CombinedIso1 and
CombinedIso2 for the 2 legs.
Started genenrating large amount of ntuple samples with byCombinedIsolationDeltaBetaCorrRaw3Hits < 1.5.
12/4/2013
Event displayer was modified for this experiment and can be found at:
https://github.com/elaird/supy-tflat
Due to not being able to access
ByMediumCombinedIsolationDBSumPtCorr3Hits, we looked into using variable byCombinedIsolationDeltaBetaCorrRaw3Hits for isolation.
From the results (
eventDisplay) of 7 events passing:
- ttPtEta1:leg1.pt()>30 && abs(leg1.eta())<2.3
- ttPtEta2:leg2.pt()>30 && abs(leg2.eta())<2.3
- ttOs:charge==0
- tau1Hadronic:abs(leg1.userFloat("dZ"))<0.2 && leg1.tauID("decayModeFinding")>0
- tau2Hadronic:abs(leg2.userFloat("dZ"))<0.2 && leg2.tauID("decayModeFinding")>0
- ttMuonVeto1:leg1.tauID("againstMuonLoose2")>0
- ttMuonVeto2:leg2.tauID("againstMuonLoose2")>0
- ttElectronVeto1:leg1.tauID("againstElectronLoose")
- ttElectronVeto2:leg2.tauID("againstElectronLoose") && leg2.tauID("againstElectronLooseMVA3")
- ttIsolation1:leg1.tauID("byCombinedIsolationDeltaBetaCorrRaw3Hits")<4
- ttIsolation2:leg2.tauID("byCombinedIsolationDeltaBetaCorrRaw3Hits")<4
12/3/2013
Followed twiki [1] for tau id and isolation requirements:
Isolation variable
ByMediumCombinedIsolationDBSumPtCorr3Hits was not found.
We started working on displaying the gen and reco jets and particles.
[1]
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/CMS/HiggsToTauTauWorkingSummer2013#Tau_Tau_Final_state
12/2/2013
The difference in the number of gen taus with gen ele/mu is most likely a result of the cuts applied on the skimming proccess from AOD to PATuples.
We required pt > 30
GeV for taus and pt > ~ 13
GeV for ele/mu.
As we can see from the pt distribution of the gen leptons:
gen_lep_pt.pdf, ele/mu/taus behave the same for pt > 50/100
GeV for leg1/leg2
11/28/2013
Plots:
11/26/2013
Plots: